[Bug 1759462] Re: Keyboard shortcuts not operational on 18.04

2019-02-28 Thread Christian Lehmann
Kubuntu 18.04, KDE Plasma Version 5.12.7, Qt Version 5.9.5, Microsoft Natural keyboard: Same thing: Although configured in Global Shortcuts, Ctrl-Alt-t does not trigger Konsole -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1664171] [NEW] package systemd-sysv 229-3ubuntu1_amd64 failed to install/upgrade: pre-dependency problem - not installing systemd-sysv

2017-02-13 Thread Christian Lehmann
Public bug reported: This happened during upgrade from 15.10 to 16.04. None of the following dpkg solved the problem ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: systemd-sysv 229-4ubuntu16 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-62.83-generic 4.4.40 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-62-generic x86_64

[Bug 699850] [NEW] users administration does not come up for root

2011-01-07 Thread Christian Lehmann
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools After upgrading to Ubuntu 10.10, the users administration interface does not come up for root. Instead, the complete menue appears in grey, and the wait cursor signals an endless loop. The only way to terminate it is to kill the

[Bug 699850] Re: users administration does not come up for root

2011-01-07 Thread Christian Lehmann
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 685215 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685215 Yes, it is a duplicate. Incidentally, #685215 was not shown in the list suggested as possible duplicates when I first submitted bug report #699850. There is one info missing from the duplicate, viz. the

[Bug 504719] [NEW] size of symbols on GNOME panel inappropriate

2010-01-08 Thread Christian Lehmann
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Ubuntu 9.10, GNOME (2.28?) The following is not a technical bug, but three features whose design is inappropriate. The issue is, thus, userfriendlyness. In the first two cases, the number of symbols that fit on the panel is at stake. 1) In the

[Bug 504719] Re: size of symbols on GNOME panel inappropriate

2010-01-08 Thread Christian Lehmann
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37612797/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37612798/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37612800/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 504742] [NEW] arrangement of menue labels on GNOME panel inappropriate

2010-01-08 Thread Christian Lehmann
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Ubuntu 9.10, GNOME (2.28?) The following is not a technical bug, but a feature whose design is inappropriate. The issue is, thus, userfriendliness. The labels of the menu categories ('Anwendungen', 'Orte', 'System' in my German version) are

[Bug 504741] [NEW] size of symbols on GNOME panel inappropriate

2010-01-08 Thread Christian Lehmann
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Ubuntu 9.10, GNOME (2.28?) The following is not a technical bug, but a feature whose design is inappropriate. The issue is, thus, userfriendliness. In the GNOME panel, symbols are sized automatically by an algorithm that looks whether the shortest

[Bug 504744] [NEW] no free space on GNOME panel available

2010-01-08 Thread Christian Lehmann
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Ubuntu 9.10, GNOME (2.28?) The following is not a technical bug, but a features whose design is inappropriate. The issue is, thus, userfriendliness. The more my panel is occupied by symbols, the harder it becomes to find a spot on the panel where

Re: [Bug 504719] Re: size of symbols on GNOME panel inappropriate

2010-01-08 Thread Christian Lehmann
Pedro Villavicencio schrieb: you need to open a separate report for each of those issues. I doubt that this is useful in the present case, since in all three issues, arrangement of symbols on the panel is at stake. But, of course, I complied. -- Prof. Dr. Christian Lehmann Seminar für