Re: [Bug 400097] Re: system won't suspend on lid close

2011-08-15 Thread Jan Minář
Thank you for your question. To answer it, I haven't been able to reproduce this bug since I switched to OS X. I am still unable to reproduce under OS X 10.6.7. Keep up the good work! With regards, Jan Minar On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 19:28, gediminasm gediminas.morkevic...@gmail.comwrote:

Re: [Bug 313439] Re: Opening a Java Archive (.JAR) file executes it regardless of the executable permission bit

2010-06-18 Thread Jan Minář
@Kiri Your attitude is not helping. On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 20:13, Kiri jyqvkl...@googlemail.com wrote: I regard this as not a bug.  There may be an issue, but the issue is not a bug. -- Opening a Java Archive (.JAR) file executes it regardless of the executable permission bit

Re: [Bug 313439] Re: Opening a Java Archive (.JAR) file executes it regardless of the executable permission bit

2010-06-18 Thread Jan Minář
doesn't understand what a jar file actually is. There is no attitude, just simply a case of somebody who doesn't get what a jar file is and how it gets executed. I don't get why this bug is even still open... Just my $0.02. -Rob On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Jan Minář rdan...@rdancer.org

[Bug 400097] Re: system won't suspend on lid close

2009-08-23 Thread Jan Minář
Whether machine goes into Suspend is configurable in Ubuntu. In the top menu toolbar, choose : System Preferences Power Management On the respective tab (On AC Power / On Battery Power), the option When laptop lid is closed -- choose Suspend. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New

Re: [Bug 313439] Re: Opening a Java Archive (.JAR) file executes it regardless of the executable permission bit

2009-05-04 Thread Jan Minář
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 00:55, Scott Ritchie scottritc...@ubuntu.com wrote: My proposal here is to do the same thing I'm experimenting with for Wine: have the mime type associate with a new application that checks for the execute bit - if it's there it's passed normally, and if it's not the

Re: [Bug 313439] Re: Opening a Java Archive (.JAR) file executes it regardless of the executable permission bit

2009-01-31 Thread Jan Minář
Looks to me as this bug should be reassigned to the respective package that holds tose MIME associations? Which one would that be? The MIME association should test if file is executable, and only execute it then. May be a broader issue in the MIME associations file, not just regarding JARs? --

Re: [Bug 313439] Re: Opening a Java Archive (.JAR) file executes it regardless of the executable permission bit

2009-01-31 Thread Jan Minář
for the executable permission bit, and depending on it either run the read association, or the execute association. On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 15:04, Jan Minář rdan...@rdancer.org wrote: Looks to me as this bug should be reassigned to the respective package that holds tose MIME associations? Which

Re: [Bug 313439] Re: Opening a Java Archive (.JAR) file executes it regardless of the executable permission bit

2009-01-28 Thread Jan Minář
I installed the gvfs-bin package, and tried: gvfs-open /path/to/foo.jar and it indeed executes the JAR contents. What do you mean by ``desktop file installed by java''? On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 13:58, Pedro Villavicencio pe...@ubuntu.com wrote: comment from upstream: does it also happen

Re: [Bug 313439] Re: Opening a Java Archive (.JAR) file executes it regardless of the executable permission bit

2009-01-26 Thread Jan Minář
, Jan Minář rdan...@rdancer.org wrote: Richard, You're confusing things. You can not execute .java files, that's source code. It must be compiled into byte code (.class files). Executable .jar archive will contain one or more .class files. For the purpose of this bug, the byte code can

Re: [Bug 48132] Re: Integrate with pam-keyring to securely avoid keyring password challenge

2009-01-19 Thread Jan Minář
The reason is the buggy behaviour still is present in Hardy. On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 11:34, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote: there is no reason to reopen this bug since gnome-keyring has pam integration for several cycles now ** Changed in: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jan

[Bug 48132] Re: Integrate with pam-keyring to securely avoid keyring password challenge

2009-01-17 Thread Jan Minář
Solution needs to implement http://live.gnome.org/GnomeKeyring/Pam. -- Integrate with pam-keyring to securely avoid keyring password challenge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48132 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

[Bug 48132] Re: Integrate with pam-keyring to securely avoid keyring password challenge

2009-01-17 Thread Jan Minář
Closing valid bugs just because we don't like them doesn't make them go away, now does it? ** Changed in: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) = Jan Minář (rdancer-rdancer) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- Integrate with pam-keyring to securely avoid

[Bug 74360] Re: Several compose key combinations don't work

2009-01-16 Thread Jan Minář
The compose tables should be unified, also with the Linux virtual console compose tables. The compose mechanism is a very powerful one, and this schism is contra-productive. I should not have to think carefully before I can type my own surname. -- Several compose key combinations don't work

[Bug 313439] Re: Opening a Java Archive (.JAR) file executes it regardless of the executable permission bit

2009-01-03 Thread Jan Minář
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20878280/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ExtensionSummary.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20878281/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: profiles.ini.txt

Re: [Bug 313439] Re: Opening a Java Archive (.JAR) file executes it regardless of the executable permission bit

2009-01-03 Thread Jan Minář
* Java is generally pretty safe (although I am sure someone will post something to prove otherwise). Even if a malicious file was run the hopes are that the user isn't running the file as root (he/she would have to enter a password regardless) so the whole system would be affected... Java