Wouter, can you clarify, please: this
http://packages.ubuntu.com/intrepid/gthumb says that gthumb in intrepid
is still of version 2.10.6 while the fixed upstream version is 2.10.7?
--
Shortcuts [ and ] for loseless rotation don't work in full-screen mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151863
Mike, thanks!
I'm not very familiar with Ubuntu's policy on propagating such fixes
into a distribution updates. Will the fixed gthumb appear in some Gutsy
update soon or it will be deferred until the next release?
--
Shortcuts [ and ] for loseless rotation don't work in full-screen mode
Public bug reported:
Note that this is not a dupe of #6036 which was fixed and shortcuts were
working fine in Feisty. This one has regressed in Gutsy.
** Affects: gthumb (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Shortcuts [ and ] for loseless rotation don't work in
Yes, it works in Gutsy Gibbon. Haven't tested it again on Feisty yet.
--
glChess has no 3D
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71593
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
I've finally managed to create some mock-ups of what I think would be
good emblems (see attachment emblems-mockup.png). They are not in any
way for real use, I just used stock icons to show my idea.
Some highlights:
- emblems have different color (the purpose of the bug)
- emblems have mostly
I think Karoliina made a good point. Yes, usability and style are often
not related. The original point of the bug is that current emblems are
stylish but not usable (or not so much usable). That's why I suggested
that we can improve usability even by returning old Gnome icons. But
sure we all
I'm all in favor of placing the emblems on folders, they take less space
this way. In fact they used to do this in Breezy but changed it in
Dapper.
But my main concern is still shape and color of emblems.
--
Round orange emblems have lack usability
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73023
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: human-icon-theme
Some background. I use Gnome in its 'spatial' mode and rely heavily on
spatial characteristics: placement of objects, their color, form and
texture. Given this I use emblems a lot and before Edgy they played a
big and good role in
** Attachment added: Useful emblems
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5150596/emblems-tangerine.png
--
Round orange emblems have lack usability
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73023
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
** Attachment added: Round orange emblems
http://librarian.launchpad.net/5150587/emblems-human.png
--
Round orange emblems have lack usability
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73023
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 68036 ***
To me it doesn't look like a dupe of bug 68036 because there described a
problem of not seeing a share's content in Nautilus. Here the share is
accessible and programs like evince and eog open files just fine. It's
rhythmbox and totem that fail when
11 matches
Mail list logo
