[Bug 11334]

2012-08-13 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Marc, this particular bug is Linux-specific. You should file a new one if you happen to have this same problem on Windows. Clipboard implementations are completely different among different operating systems, so Windows issues are totally irrelevant in this Linux bug. -- You received this bug

Re: [Bug 14335] Re: nautilus wants to execute all text files on a vfat and ntfs drives

2010-04-21 Thread Rimas Kudelis
2010.04.21 22:45, Przemysław Kulczycki rašė: ** Summary changed: - nautilus wants to execute all text files on a vfat flash drive + nautilus wants to execute all text files on a vfat and ntfs drives ** Summary changed: - nautilus wants to execute all text files on a vfat and ntfs drives +

[Bug 323992] [NEW] Allow to get rid of PulseAudio easily

2009-02-01 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Public bug reported: I'm not quite sure if it's a control-center bug, but this is where an appropriate setting could live. Currently, to disable PulseAudio, one has to manually hunt down each and every possible reason why this daemon starts. This is very time consuming and gets on nerves when

[Bug 180627] Re: rhythmbox saves mp3 tag at start of file but loads already existing tag from end of file

2008-05-16 Thread Rimas Kudelis
I too am facing this problem. I thought APE writes ID3 tags, but actually, it writes APETAG tags, and yes they are stored at the end of the file, and yes Rhythmbox prefers them over ID3 2.3 for display, but updates/writes ID3 instead. Unfortunately, my file is also copyrighted (perhaps it

[Bug 159238] Re: Garbage in gnome-terminal

2007-11-11 Thread Rimas Kudelis
** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal - When switching active workspaces, windows etc, gnome-terminal frequently displays unacceptable garbage in its terminal widget. - This could be caused by vim (as it's the application I use most in my gnome-terminal sessions). +

[Bug 139457] Re: Entering and removing combining characters messes up terminal display

2007-11-01 Thread Rimas Kudelis
** Summary changed: - Entering dagesh creates unremovable characters + Entering and removing combining characters messes up terminal display -- Entering and removing combining characters messes up terminal display https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139457 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 139457] Re: Entering and removing combining characters messes up terminal display

2007-11-01 Thread Rimas Kudelis
This actually happens with all combining characters, not just the dagesh. For example, if in terminal you enter a letter s followed by U+0300 (COMBINING GRAVE ACCENT) and U+0327 (COMBINING CEDILLA), you see these three chars in a row, like this: s`¸ . If you now press Enter, you'll see a

[Bug 159238] Re: Garbage in gnome-terminal

2007-11-01 Thread Rimas Kudelis
** Attachment added: An example http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10238154/garbage1.png -- Garbage in gnome-terminal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-terminal in ubuntu. --

[Bug 159238] Garbage in gnome-terminal

2007-11-01 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal When switching active workspaces, windows etc, gnome-terminal frequently displays unacceptable garbage in its terminal widget. This could be caused by vim (as it's the application I use most in my gnome-terminal sessions). ** Affects:

[Bug 159238] Re: Garbage in gnome-terminal

2007-11-01 Thread Rimas Kudelis
** Attachment added: Another example (same terminal session) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10238155/garbage2.png ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal - When switching active workspaces, windows etc, gnome-terminal frequently displays garbage in its terminal

[Bug 124992] Re: Symbolic links aren't resolved when creating a zip archive

2007-07-31 Thread Rimas Kudelis
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #462371 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462371 ** Also affects: fileroller (upstream) via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462371 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Symbolic links aren't resolved when creating a zip

[Bug 22930] Re: Newly-sensitive button ignores clicks until cursor re-enters it

2007-07-09 Thread Rimas Kudelis
The resolution is in process. Check the upstream bug (gnome-bugs #56070) for more detail. -- Newly-sensitive button ignores clicks until cursor re-enters it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22930 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct

[Bug 124992] Symbolic links aren't resolved when creating a zip archive

2007-07-09 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: file-roller When creating a zip archive, symbolic links aren't being followed, but are added as links instead (zip -y == store symbolic links as the link instead of the referenced file). I don't think that's how it should be as a symlink in an archive

[Bug 124992] Re: Symbolic links aren't resolved when creating a zip archive

2007-07-09 Thread Rimas Kudelis
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8354382/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8354383/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8354384/ProcStatus.txt -- Symbolic links

[Bug 63090] Re: do not eject all USB/Firewire devices

2007-07-05 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Confirming, the feisty-backports package solves the problem by suggesting to unmount a partition instead of ejecting the whole drive. -- do not eject all USB/Firewire devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63090 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 102514] Re: Can't eject external USB hard drive

2007-06-22 Thread Rimas Kudelis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 63090 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63090 I too am suffering from this bug. When I try to eject my USB-to-IDE HDD, it disappears from the desktop for a moment, and then comes back with an unable to eject error message. Furthermore, if I run sudo

[Bug 109224] Re: Optical drive tray ejects when ejecting USB removable hard disc drive

2007-06-22 Thread Rimas Kudelis
the unable to eject part is related to Bug #102514. -- Optical drive tray ejects when ejecting USB removable hard disc drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109224 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-volume-manager

[Bug 81915] Re: adds/removes same device many times a second causing high loads and extremally slow performance

2007-03-26 Thread Rimas Kudelis
I think it's closed now. ** Changed in: hal (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected -- adds/removes same device many times a second causing high loads and extremally slow performance https://launchpad.net/bugs/81915 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 93229] Window for gdmflexiserver -n disappears on desktop switch

2007-03-17 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Public bug reported: If you run an Xnest'ed GDM session and login as a different user in it, and then switch workspaces, the Xnest window disapears. It seems like the whole nested session dies, but leaves some footprint so that when you run gdmflexiserver again, you get to choose between a

[Bug 93229] Window for gdmflexiserver -n disappears on desktop switch

2007-03-17 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Public bug reported: If you run an Xnest'ed GDM session and login as a different user in it, and then switch workspaces, the Xnest window disapears. It seems like the whole nested session dies, but leaves some footprint so that when you run gdmflexiserver again, you get to choose between a

[Bug 93229] Re: Window for gdmflexiserver -n disappears on desktop switch

2007-03-17 Thread Rimas Kudelis
FYI: this is very similar to bug #49740, but a different package is involved. -- Window for gdmflexiserver -n disappears on desktop switch https://launchpad.net/bugs/93229 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 93229] Re: Window for gdmflexiserver -n disappears on desktop switch

2007-03-17 Thread Rimas Kudelis
.. and the process is not running after window is lost. So it's much rather a crash, than a hiding window. -- Window for gdmflexiserver -n disappears on desktop switch https://launchpad.net/bugs/93229 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-13 Thread Rimas Kudelis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** I'm not offended, sorry for my tone. It's just that recieving long comments that make no use is sometimes annoying. Anyways, rkaliss, good luck with Ubuntu. Here's one lesson for you: always look at This report is a duplicate of bug #* header at

[Bug 14669] Re: GTK+ buttons not clickable if the window loses focus

2007-03-12 Thread Rimas Kudelis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** Jeez, Ray, don't you see this bug is marked as a dupe? Did you care to check the description for bug #22930? It says Mouse focus doesn't return until mouse is moved off button. Doesn't its description reflect the problem? -- GTK+ buttons not

[Bug 86589] Re: gdmXnest doesn't run gdm

2007-03-08 Thread Rimas Kudelis
OK, gdmXnest now starts a black window again. But isn't that a bug that I don't see a login greeting (gdm screen) in it? -- gdmXnest doesn't run gdm https://launchpad.net/bugs/86589 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 86589] Re: gdmXnest doesn't run gdm

2007-03-07 Thread Rimas Kudelis
I expect it to run gdm in an Xnest window, but it doesn't. BTW, today gdmXnest doesn't run at all: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ gdmXnest ERROR! Can't find free display! [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ gdmXnest -- :1 ERROR! Can't find free display! Is it worth mentioning, that I am only running a single instance

[Bug 86589] Re: gdmXnest doesn't run gdm

2007-02-24 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Oops, my bad! I'm using Ubuntu Feisty. in gdm.conf: Xnest=/usr/bin/Xnest -br -br -audit 0 -name Xnest Installed version of gdm: 2.17.7-0ubuntu3 Todays output (differs from previous): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ $ gdmXnest DISPLAY=:20 a black window runs with a black X-shaped cursor. Nothing happens

[Bug 86589] gdmXnest doesn't run gdm

2007-02-20 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm When running gdmXnest, Xnest runs, but gdm doesn't. Here's a console log: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/mozilla/trunk/lt $ gdmXnest Failed to connect to socket, sleep 1 second and retry Trying failed command again. Try 2 of 5. Failed to connect

[Bug 81915] Re: [feisty] hald adds/removes same device many times a second causing high loads and extremally slow performance

2007-02-11 Thread Rimas Kudelis
powersaved is another process that eats up RAM. Currently, to get my machine into usable state, I do the following: $ sudo /etc/init.d/powersaved stop $ sudo /etc/init.d/ivman stop After this, hald still uses a lot of CPU cycles, but at least my RAM isn't consumed. Also, when memory usage rises,

[Bug 81915] Re: [feisty] hald adds/removes same device many times a second causing high loads and extremally slow performance

2007-01-28 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Oh, and here's a (most probably) related excerpt from kern.log: Jan 28 20:05:49 localhost kernel: [28566.887995] Intel ISA PCIC probe: not found. Jan 28 20:05:50 localhost kernel: [28566.944927] Intel ISA PCIC probe: not found. Jan 28 20:05:50 localhost kernel: [28567.008010] Intel ISA PCIC

[Bug 81915] [feisty] hald adds/removes same device many times a second causing high loads and extremally slow performance

2007-01-27 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hal I've dist-upgraded to feisty a few days ago, and since then my system is impossible to use. I suspect it's hald's fault, because it detects some device A LOT OF TIMES per second, adding and removing it each time. As a result of this, hald uses like

[Bug 3887] Re: Gnome Forward button cannot be clicked twice without moving the mouse out of the button

2007-01-20 Thread Rimas Kudelis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 22930 Mouse focus doesn't return until mouse is moved off button -- Gnome Forward button cannot be clicked twice without moving the mouse out of the button https://launchpad.net/bugs/3887 --

[Bug 3887] Re: Gnome Forward button cannot be clicked twice without moving the mouse out of the button

2007-01-20 Thread Rimas Kudelis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 22930 *** John, please watch bug #22930, it is the main tracking bug for this GTK issue. -- Gnome Forward button cannot be clicked twice without moving the mouse out of the button https://launchpad.net/bugs/3887 -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 22930] Re: Mouse focus doesn't return until mouse is moved off button

2007-01-20 Thread Rimas Kudelis
John, it's not assumed to be a problem with Gnome. This is a problem with GTK - the toolkit upon which both Gnome and Xfce are built. -- Mouse focus doesn't return until mouse is moved off button https://launchpad.net/bugs/22930 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 54890] Re: The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed

2007-01-11 Thread Rimas Kudelis
I think it would. However, you can also run Jason's test script to check if things are fixed. -- The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed https://launchpad.net/bugs/54890 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 54890] Re: The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed

2006-12-06 Thread Rimas Kudelis
I don't actually know. The icon that is used for GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY is no longer in /usr/share/icons/gnome/24x24/stock/io/stock_open.png. I don't understand where GTK picks it from. However, making a following symlink: /usr/share/icons/Human/24x24/actions/gtk-directory.png -

[Bug 54890] Re: The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed

2006-12-06 Thread Rimas Kudelis
uh... disregard the first paragraph in my previous message. I wrote it before finding the solution... -- The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed https://launchpad.net/bugs/54890 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 54890] Re: The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed

2006-12-06 Thread Rimas Kudelis
By the way, only 24x24 icon is not enough, you need to take care of the other sizes aswell (e.g. menu uses 16x16 by default, I guess). We need at least 16x16, 22x22, and 24x24 icons. -- The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed https://launchpad.net/bugs/54890 -- desktop-bugs mailing

[Bug 60722] Set better umasks for FAT filesystems (USB drives etc)

2006-09-16 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: hal Currently, FAT partitions on USB disks etc. are mounted with umask=077, thus making every file on them look like an executable. It would make more sense to mount those filesystems with dmask=077,fmask=177 options, so that directories can be browsed,

[Bug 54890] Re: The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed

2006-09-16 Thread Rimas Kudelis
I still have the same problem in Edgy - GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon in applications doesn't change when I apply Human theme. People even started workarounding this in their software: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354575 -- The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed

[Bug 54890] Re: The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed

2006-09-16 Thread Rimas Kudelis
I have filed this problem as a GTK+ bug on their bugzilla: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356270 -- The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed https://launchpad.net/bugs/54890 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 54890] Re: The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed

2006-08-02 Thread Rimas Kudelis
@Carthic: thanks for proxying my bugreport. I couldn't manage to report it here for some reason (malone said the ubuntu-artwork package didn't use malone). Hence, i used reportbug... :) @Daniel: By GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY i mean this item:

[Bug 54890] Re: The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed

2006-08-02 Thread Rimas Kudelis
This is a GTK icon, not GNOME icon. Does what you said about GNOME 2.16 affect GTK too? -- The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed https://launchpad.net/bugs/54890 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 54890] Re: The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed

2006-08-02 Thread Rimas Kudelis
Ouch, sorry for reattaching the bug to ubuntu-artwork... -- The GTK_STOCK_DIRECTORY icon isn't being themed https://launchpad.net/bugs/54890 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs