Re: [Bug 296867]

2014-04-28 Thread Ronald Pottol
Well, my issue isn't how the devs choose to spend their time, but the extremely hostile and dismissive attitude they took towards security and privacy when they have addressed this bug/feature request/feature. I haven't paid them, they are not obligated to me, I am disturbed that Ubuntu would

Re: [Bug 296867] Re: empathy needs to support OTR encryption

2014-04-18 Thread Ronald Pottol
From comments when this first arose, the empathy developers were not interested in something that was interoperable with OTR, but might, someday, be interested in their own unique snowflake of an encryption system. I'm not a coder, but OTR is out there, works, and plays well with others. They

Re: [Bug 296867] Re: empathy needs to support OTR encryption

2010-06-16 Thread Ronald Pottol
Heck, I cannot even figure out how to have Empathy support multiple statuses! One status, for all accounts, or perhaps that is just from the way Ubuntu integrated it. Some accounts I want to be invisible, I don't want to have a flippant status for work, etc. Ron On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 2:25 PM,

Re: [Bug 296867] Re: empathy needs to support OTR encryption

2010-03-29 Thread Ronald Pottol
As I recall, Empathy feels the world should be fixed. This would be nice, but it is a long ways off. So, yes, they have switched the default IM to empathy, which has no real plans to support encryption in the foreseeable future (xmmp crypto someday?), but Pidgin/OTR will remain installable. Of