[Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade

2019-08-20 Thread klfyt
** Description changed: Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) - - # for example if you skip to previous + # for example if you skip to previous # a > b (previous) fix it with # b > c

[Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade

2019-08-20 Thread klfyt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfwm4/+bug/1837783 :-) lol? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade To

[Bug 1840476] Re: Natural is move equals draw

2019-08-18 Thread klfyt
Hi. Draw only then it moves. Makes sense? ** Changed in: gimp (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840476 Title: Natural is move

[Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade

2019-08-16 Thread klfyt
** Description changed: - Something is wrong with previous view killing performance and responsiveness, etc. The only obvious fix seems to be to skip it. :)) + + + # for example if you skip to previous + # a > b (previous) fix it with + # b > c > b -- You received this bug

[Bug 1840476] [NEW] Natural is move equals draw

2019-08-16 Thread klfyt
Public bug reported: Atm gimp brushes start to draw immediately following mouse click I believe this could be improved if you simply draw while mouse moves. ** Affects: gimp Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: gimp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status:

[Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade

2019-08-15 Thread klfyt
Maybe previous view contains recursive function that keeps fighting for resources? :)) ** Also affects: linux Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade

2019-08-15 Thread klfyt
** Also affects: xfwm4 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: ubuntu ** Also affects: xorg-server Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in

[Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade

2019-08-14 Thread klfyt
** Also affects: nautilus Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: xfwm4 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: nautilus ** Project changed: xfwm4 => ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 1839610] Re: Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade

2019-08-14 Thread klfyt
** Summary changed: - If you travel BACK directly it kills visible scrolling performance + Skipping previous view doesn't let performance degrade ** Description changed: - If you travel directly to location there you have been - with BACK command (alt left) for example then - scrolling seems

[Bug 1839610] Re: If you travel BACK directly it kills visible scrolling performance

2019-08-13 Thread klfyt
Just skip previous directly seems the rule, dunno what it is. :)) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: If you travel BACK directly it kills visible

[Bug 1836462] Re: Renaming Templates to # Templates fixes speed issues present in wide range of desktop applications

2019-08-12 Thread klfyt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1839610 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1837783 Window history implementation is broken ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1839610 If you travel BACK directly it kills visible

[Bug 1839610] Re: If you travel BACK directly it kills visible scrolling performance

2019-08-12 Thread klfyt
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1740095 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740095 ** Also affects: nautilus (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740095 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1839610] Re: If you travel BACK directly it kills visible scrolling performance

2019-08-11 Thread klfyt
** Description changed: - Each time you travel to new location, e.g. - Home --> Documents + If you travel directly to location there you have been + with BACK command (alt left) for example then + scrolling seems to get worse. This is fixable + if you revisit recent files in a new window (ctrl

[Bug 1839610] Re: If you travel BACK directly it kills visible scrolling performance

2019-08-11 Thread klfyt
** Summary changed: - You can improve performance if you revisit history (recent files) + If you travel BACK directly it kills visible scrolling performance -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1839610] Re: You can improve performance if you revisit history (recent files)

2019-08-10 Thread klfyt
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839610 Title: You can improve performance if you revisit

[Bug 1839610] Re: You can improve performance if you revisit history (recent files)

2019-08-09 Thread klfyt
> what sort of performance improvement are you speaking about Like you started on a 1st page. I believe window history is broken, I don't know how. Just revisit history. :)) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus

[Bug 1839610] [NEW] You can improve performance if you revisit history (recent files)

2019-08-09 Thread klfyt
Public bug reported: Each time you travel to new location, e.g. Home --> Documents you can improve performance if you open new window and go to recent files (file history) and close it (I use Ctrl W shortcut). Performance change is left while you stay in the location if you travel to a new

[Bug 1836462] Re: Renaming Templates to # Templates fixes speed issues present in wide range of desktop applications

2019-08-03 Thread klfyt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1837783 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837783 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1837783 Snapping or workspace settings are broken >:] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 1836462] Re: Renaming Templates to # Templates fixes speed issues present in wide range of desktop applications

2019-07-28 Thread klfyt
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1837783 Navigating directly back kills performance -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xdg-user-dirs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836462 Title: Renaming

[Bug 1836462] Re: Renaming Templates to # Templates fixes speed issues present in wide range of desktop applications

2019-07-25 Thread klfyt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1837783 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1837783 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1837783 Scrolling can be improved a lot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1836462] Re: Renaming Templates to # Templates fixes speed issues present in wide range of desktop applications

2019-07-24 Thread klfyt
Two other findings which seriously win back scrolling performance: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670504#c117 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731759 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1836462] Re: Renaming Templates to # Templates fixes speed issues present in wide range of desktop applications

2019-07-22 Thread klfyt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731759 ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1731759 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731759 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xdg-user-dirs in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1836462] Re: Renaming Templates to # Templates fixes speed issues present in wide range of desktop applications

2019-07-19 Thread klfyt
Any opinions? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670504#c102 :-) ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1670504 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670504 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1836462] [NEW] Renaming Templates to # Templates fixes speed issues present in wide range of desktop applications

2019-07-13 Thread klfyt
Public bug reported: Renaming "Templates" to "# Templates" fixes a lot of speed issues in a range of desktop applications, e.g. file managers, text editors, etc. ** Affects: xdg-user-dirs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: xdg-user-dirs (Fedora)