[Bug 1887252] Re: config-error-dialog.sh should pass --no-markup

2023-02-19 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package gdm3 - 43.0-3ubuntu2 --- gdm3 (43.0-3ubuntu2) lunar; urgency=medium * debian/patches/ubuntu/config_error_dialog.patch: - Use --no-markup option in zenity call (LP: #1887252) -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:41:29 +0100 ** Changed

[Bug 1887252] Re: config-error-dialog.sh should pass --no-markup

2023-02-16 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package lightdm - 1.30.0-0ubuntu8 --- lightdm (1.30.0-0ubuntu8) lunar; urgency=medium * debian/config-error-dialog.sh: - Use --no-markup option in zenity call (LP: #1887252) -- Gunnar Hjalmarsson Wed, 08 Feb 2023 22:29:55 +0100 ** Changed in:

[Bug 1887252] Re: config-error-dialog.sh should pass --no-markup

2023-02-08 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
Change for gdm3 was pushed to git repo: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gdm/-/commit/03d610a4 lightdm has been uploaded with the change. ** Changed in: gdm3 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed --

Re: [Bug 1887252] Re: config-error-dialog.sh should pass --no-markup

2023-02-07 Thread Hongyi Zhao
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 10:25 AM Gunnar Hjalmarsson <1887...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > That looks like a better solution indeed, and I think I have got enough > of evidence that we should go for Sebastian's suggestion. > > ( Why didn't you mention that upstream discussion in your bug? ;) )

[Bug 1887252] Re: config-error-dialog.sh should pass --no-markup

2023-02-07 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
That looks like a better solution indeed, and I think I have got enough of evidence that we should go for Sebastian's suggestion. ( Why didn't you mention that upstream discussion in your bug? ;) ) Thanks for your persistence! I'll make that change soon. ** Changed in: gdm3 (Ubuntu)

Re: [Bug 1887252] Re: config-error-dialog.sh should pass --no-markup

2023-02-07 Thread Hongyi Zhao
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:15 AM Gunnar Hjalmarsson <1887...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > @Hongyi Zhao: As you wrote in the duplicate bug, my simplistic code in > comment #2, which only escapes the '<' character, would not be > sufficient. At the same time the issue I mentioned, about --no-markup

[Bug 1887252] Re: config-error-dialog.sh should pass --no-markup

2023-02-07 Thread Gunnar Hjalmarsson
@Hongyi Zhao: As you wrote in the duplicate bug, my simplistic code in comment #2, which only escapes the '<' character, would not be sufficient. At the same time the issue I mentioned, about --no-markup making \n being displayed literally instead of interpreted as a newline, still stands.

Re: [Bug 1887252] Re: config-error-dialog.sh should pass --no-markup

2023-02-06 Thread Hongyi Zhao
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 10:45 AM Daniel van Vugt <1887...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > ** Tags added: jammy lunar > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a > duplicate bug report (2005135). > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887252 > > Title: >

[Bug 1887252] Re: config-error-dialog.sh should pass --no-markup

2023-02-06 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Tags added: jammy lunar -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887252 Title: config-error-dialog.sh should pass --no-markup To manage notifications about this bug go to: