[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
I have just made a couple of tests, and the result is: 1: mate-terminal interprets correctly the --geometry over the both of Wayland and Xorg ** hence it was rigth when I derived "theoretically" from the behaviour of the Gnome Shell, that also over Wayland the client programs can position their

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-27 Thread Péter Prőhle
** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: Opinion => Confirmed ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu) Status: Opinion => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-13 Thread Péter Prőhle
OK, if you think that Wayland is responsible for the but, then: 1: this but must be upstreamed to the developers of the Wayland protocol 2: and this bug is also a bug of the "21.04 release as a whole", since it is a bug that it makes this buggy Wayland as default. I understand that this bug

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-13 Thread Péter Prőhle
"Although dragging could be done by relative movements. Setting an absolute position does appear to be impossible in Wayland." If it was really impossibble, then how the Gnome shell or any window manager can position *itself*? We see, that the diverse components of the diverse window managers

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-10 Thread Péter Prőhle
The definition of "confirmed" is that "Verified by someone other than the reporter.", hence in case of "gnome-terminal" it was wrong to remove the "confirmed" tag, since someone other than me reported as well that the "gnome-terminal" is affected, and hence it is totally right, that the

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-10 Thread Péter Prőhle
The bug is clearly stated, reproducible and confirmed by others as well. Hence it can not be ONLY "invalid + opinion + opinion" at 3 packages, and no package is mentioned with "new" or "confirmed". It is acceptable, if someone's opinion is that "mutter is not new but opinion only". But it is

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-09 Thread Daniel van Vugt
** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu) Status: New => Opinion -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1925732 Title: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-08 Thread Péter Prőhle
A very personal comment: the main reason why I use linux exclusively since 1994 is that I can work in character terminal using the unix command line programming environment for my everyday goals (teaching and researching math and computational math). This is the reason why I am so sensitive for

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-08 Thread Péter Prőhle
Sorry to oppose the opinion of those who probaly know the system much better than me, but it is simply NOT TRUE that neither Ubuntu nor especially Mutter is responsible for the huge step backward, the missing positioning of windows on the screen what was always possible since the 80's. AND it is

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-05 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Fedora) Status: Unknown => Invalid ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Fedora) Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-04 Thread Daniel van Vugt
Although dragging could be done by relative movements. Setting an absolute position does appear to be impossible in Wayland. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314967 https://askubuntu.com/questions/1104827/how-can-i-get-the-geometry-option-working-with-the-gnome-terminal-command-in-a-t

[Bug 1925732] Re: [wayland] gnome window manager ignores the --geometry location request of the gnome-terminal

2021-05-04 Thread Daniel van Vugt
On second thoughts, client-side decoration means that Wayland apps do in a way set their own position when being dragged. So maybe there is a solution. ** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Confirmed