[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2010-09-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: evolution Importance: Unknown = Medium -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-10-10 Thread Michael B. Trausch
This fix is included in Ubuntu for Intrepid. ** Changed in: evolution-data-server (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-07-17 Thread Michael B. Trausch
It would seem that the version that I put together was using the _previous_ released version that I had already on my computer. This patch is based on the version currently in Hardy as the latest available. A binary build of it is in my PPA, with the ~ppa1 package version suffix. ** Attachment

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-07-15 Thread Michael B. Trausch
https://edge.launchpad.net/~mtrausch/+archive --- I have a binary built there which comes from this attached patch (though this patch does not have the ~ppa1 version postfix on it). This patch is already included upstream, so probably doesn't need to be directly included into Intrepid. It should

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-07-15 Thread Michael B. Trausch
Patch has been submitted here and a build with that patch enabled is available on my PPA; removing bug assignment to me. ** Changed in: evolution-data-server (Ubuntu) Assignee: Michael B. Trausch (mtrausch) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- name parameter for

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-07-14 Thread hggdh
Michael, any updates here? Thanks. -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

Re: [Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-07-14 Thread Michael B. Trausch
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 16:25 +, hggdh wrote: Michael, any updates here? Thanks. Yep. Sorry, have been buried with all sorts of things, and just (finally) graduated school. I will have a debdiff today for both Hardy and Intrepid to close this bug. --- Mike -- My sigfile ran away

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-06-02 Thread Michael B. Trausch
Upstream has committed a patch for this fix; will be providing a debdiff with that patch shortly so that this issue can be closed here in Ubuntu as well. ** Changed in: evolution-data-server (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael B. Trausch (mtrausch) Status: Triaged = In Progress

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-05-28 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: evolution Status: New = Fix Released -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-03-29 Thread Michael B. Trausch
Updating for latest release pushed out recently. ** Attachment added: Diff 30-Mar-2008 against 0ubuntu2 to make it 0ubuntu3 and include this bugfix. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12974101/lp194642-updated.debdiff -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-03-12 Thread Daniel Holbach
Sébastian: could you please take a look at it? -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-03-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
would be better to have upstream opinion on the patch before using it, if the change is correct no reason it could not go to their svn, unsubscribing the sponsor team for now -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You received

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-03-10 Thread Michael B. Trausch
Updated patch to apply for newly released e-d-s. ** Attachment added: Updated debdiff against new release of EDS http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12551176/lp194642-updated.debdiff -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-03-09 Thread hggdh
Michael, I will also apply your fix, and see what happens. -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-03-07 Thread hggdh
Michael, I am not sure. Confirmed was used of old for this is as far as bugsquad can go; we later went on to Triaged meaning that. I would keep it how it is now, and see if a sponsor complains... Also -- it might be a good idea to show the output of your change, and state if you checked it

Re: [Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-03-07 Thread Michael B. Trausch
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 15:29 +, hggdh wrote: Michael, I am not sure. Confirmed was used of old for this is as far as bugsquad can go; we later went on to Triaged meaning that. I would keep it how it is now, and see if a sponsor complains... Also -- it might be a good idea to show the

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-03-07 Thread Michael B. Trausch
Removing assignment on bug per sponsorship request process at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess ** Changed in: evolution-data-server (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) = (unassigned) -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-03-07 Thread Michael B. Trausch
It may also be prudent to reiterate that the changes made remain compliant with MIME Part One, RFC 2045, §5, ¶ 3, which states: The Content-Type header field specifies the nature of the data in the body of an entity by giving media type and subtype identifiers, and by providing auxiliary

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-03-02 Thread Michael B. Trausch
Here is the proper fix, against EDS. Created a new helper function (_camel_header_param_format_append) to handle the processing of MIME field parameters, and altered the main function (camel_header_param_list_format_append) to use the new helper and defer processing of the name= MIME field until

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-03-02 Thread Michael B. Trausch
The policy for requesting sponsorship says to mark the bug as confirmed, but that would seem to downgrade the bug's status. Should I do so anyway, before requesting sponsorship? -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You received

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-02-25 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) Status: New = Triaged ** Changed in: evolution-data-server (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-02-25 Thread hggdh
by the way, Michael. Thanks for helping out. We really appreciate it. -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. --

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-02-25 Thread hggdh
rejecting Evolution, since the code change is e-d-s related (on the camel* code, it seems). ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You received this bug

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-02-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: evolution Status: Unknown = New -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. --

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-02-23 Thread Michael B. Trausch
This is a (very bad) workaround which I used to try to find the root of the problem. I say that this is a very bad workaround, because it simply refuses to send a charset parameter for text/x-java files (and anything other than text/plain, which seemed like a good test case for me since I am not

[Bug 194642] Re: name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last

2008-02-23 Thread Michael B. Trausch
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #518312 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518312 ** Also affects: evolution via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=518312 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- name parameter for content-type for attachments should be last