** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium => High
** Summary changed:
- gnome session does not restore the previous session
+ gnome-session storing broken in intrepid
--
gnome-session storing broken in intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373
You received this bug notif
** Tags added: qa-jaunty-desktop
--
gnome session does not restore the previous session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
** Changed in: gnome-session
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
--
gnome session does not restore the previous session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing lis
> > It appears that Gnome cannot be trusted to release a new version without
> > major regressions, and Ubuntu needs to rigorously test new versions before
> > committing to them.
>
> But they don't. Ubuntu is committed to releasing on a rigid schedule
> regardless of functionality or regressions
> It appears that Gnome cannot be trusted to release a new version without
> major regressions, and Ubuntu needs to rigorously test new versions before
> committing to them.
But they don't. Ubuntu is committed to releasing on a rigid schedule
regardless of functionality or regressions, too.
--
Replacing XSMP for a better way is a noble goal. However, it is
ridiculous that Gnome released 2.24 with a half done version of the new
protocol and no trace of the XSMP support. That simply speaks to bad
management at the Gnome project.
This bug is not something Ubuntu can fix at this point, bu
For a slightly different perspective on this bug, see
http://np237.livejournal.com/22014.html
However, it's true that the old behaviour was not great: openoffice didn't seem
to react to session exits (logouts), for example.
--
gnome session does not restore the previous session
https://bugs.lau
** Changed in: gnome-session (Fedora)
Status: Unknown => Invalid
--
gnome session does not restore the previous session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mail
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #465321
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465321
** Also affects: gnome-session (Fedora) via
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465321
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
gnome session does not restore the previous sessio
the bug is set as triaged because it has the required informations to be
worked, the ubuntu team doesn't really have the ressources to do the
GNOME work there though so you should better comment on
bugzilla.gnome.org
--
gnome session does not restore the previous session
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
I know many people who don't want to upgrade to Intrepid until this very
annoying bug is resolved. Is somebody working on it?, Why it still appears
triage status?. We will have to wait until Jaunty (as ever)?.
Perhaps this is not the place to discuss the impotence of view this situation.
If some
Per Sebastien's comment, I have added a couple of sentences about this
to the Intrepid release notes. I trust that's OK.
I think Martin Soto's assessment is spot on. It _is_ worrying that
Ubuntu should (as a matter of policy) be so sanguine about this. It's
also surprising that GNOME developers
I ended up downgrading gnome-session and gnome-panel to 2.22 as a
workaround. It appears to be working OK so far.
(You can't just downgrade gnome-session, because gnome-panel depends on
the newer version to support essentials such as "log out".)
This is what worked for me. Start by adding the H
The comments about the upgrade notes, those are on a wiki so anybody can
do changes there or contact the people who have been working on those
and who don't read this bug or suggest items to be added you can
contribute to the notes rather than blocking on other busy people to
write an item there
-
> With all due respect, I'm really surprised with this answer. Does this
> imply that every time an upstream project delivers a new version with
> regressions, Ubuntu will ship it just because it is the new upstream
> version, no matter what damage it may cause? Does it imply that if
> Ubuntu, for
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 08:54 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> You can also note that the low priority focus for this bug upstream is
> due to the fact that the feature has never been working really correctly
> on many software and they don't consider that something stable and used
> by the majority
At the risk of asking a really stupid question, does anyone have an idea
whether there's any likelihood of a workaround such as installing and using the
Gnome 2.22 session manager with 2.24? Or using a different session manager
entirely? I don't mind hacking my system to get this to work, but
** Tags added: regression-release
--
gnome session does not restore the previous session
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249373
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Is this regression already in:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IntrepidReleaseNotes ? I think that People must
be warned about this.
And I agree with ubuntu guys, If someone wants to complain, do not do it
here, neither on gnome tracker, comments like 'me too' is completely
useless, just put your name on
You can also note that the low priority focus for this bug upstream is
due to the fact that the feature has never been working really correctly
on many software and they don't consider that something stable and used
by the majority of users, that might be wrong but should be discussed on
bugzilla.g
Ubuntu is not writting GNOME but only contributing upstream and
distributing it. The bug was known before intrepid but downgrading the
version was not trivial, it was not clear that GNOME was not going to
work on the issue before 2.24 and Ubuntu usually ships the current
GNOME. If you are not happy
I agree that this is a serious bug, I have it since I upgraded from Hardy to
Intrepid and is really annoying.
It should be mentioned in the release notes. Maybe I should have delayed the
upgrade process if I knew about it.
--
gnome session does not restore the previous session
https://bugs.lau
Sorry if you found my tone was inappropriate. I certainly didn't mean to
offend any of the developers or volunteers who work to make Ubuntu such
a great product. I am very grateful for all the hard work they are doing
and Ubuntu is by far my favorite OS!
However, I do believe it is unacceptable fr
To maintain a respectful atmosphere, please follow the code of conduct -
http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/ . Bug reports are handled by
humans, the majority of whom are volunteers, such comments are not
appropriate there
--
gnome session does not restore the previous session
https://bugs.l
This is an extremely bad and annoying feature regression. It's a show
blocker and should not have been released. It must have been known about
before release. It's things like this that will drive users away from
Ubuntu and Linux. Absolutely unacceptable!
--
gnome session does not restore the pre
** Summary changed:
- gnome session does not start window manager nor restores the previous session
+ gnome session does not restore the previous session
** Changed in: gnome-session
Bugwatch: GNOME Bug Tracker #536685 => GNOME Bug Tracker #552387
Status: New => Unknown
--
gnome ses
26 matches
Mail list logo
