** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
Title:
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/openjdk-6
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
Title:
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin
selection
** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Alexander Sack (asac) = Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
Title:
Some plugins lack
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/totem
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu.
--
sun-java6 still has no plugin description
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in ubuntu.
** Changed in: icedtea-gcjwebplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Won't Fix
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
** Changed in: icedtea-gcjwebplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix = Fix Released
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
** Changed in: sun-java6 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing
Alexander,
On upto date Jaunty as of today Icedtea (1st entry) installs correctly - only
other entry now shown is Java SE - haven't tried that one yet.
So yeh, that seems happier.
(IcedTea is a bit flaky - found some 100% java processes left over afterwards -
but that's separate I guess).
Dave
reopening the ubufox task, until it's clear how ubufox handles
differently named plugins.
I don't understand what differently named means here? Do you have more
than one plugin .so in a single binary Package? How are those named?
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing
Dave, please test with an up-to-date jaunty install. I updaed the plugin
DB so all entries displayed in the plugin finder should work. If not,
please open a bug and subscribe me to it.
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
ubufox bug has been fixed.
However I see the following problems:
1. Adobe Flash Player installer does NOT work on 64 bit Ubuntu 9.04 (bug
#361430).
2. (cosmetic) Adobe Player and Gnash Player using capital P, while
Swfdec player uses small p.
3. (cosmetic) Adobe Flash Player URL
the ubufox task was opened by Matthias to get feedback from me I had
some questions, so its not fixed.
** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = New
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
sun-java5 does not provide the plugin package
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you are a
sun-java5 does not provide the plugin package
please don't touch reports if you don't understand how to validate them
** Changed in: sun-java5 (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Triaged
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
reopening the ubufox task, until it's clear how ubufox handles
differently named plugins.
** Changed in: ubufox (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = New
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received
icedtea-gcjwebplugin isn't built anymore
** Changed in: icedtea-gcjwebplugin (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
--
Some plugins lack proper ubufox integration (Was: confusing plugin selection
dialog)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272010
You received this bug notification because you
If I uninstall all java plugins I get three options:
1) 'The IcedTea Web Browser Plugin'
Selecting this gives the error 'Could not find package
'cacao-oj6-plugin'
2) 'GCJ Web Browser Plugin'
Selecting this gives 'Package 'gcjwebplugin' is virtual.'
3) 'The IcedTea
To provide proper integration with ubufox,
1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link for
their binary in
/usr/share/ubufox/plugins/
Xbb-Npp-File: libgnashplugin.so
this doesn't work for the current java plugins, which are installed
under a different name
This bug was fixed in the package openjdk-6 - 6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu5
---
openjdk-6 (6b14-1.4.1-0ubuntu5) jaunty; urgency=low
[Matthias Klose]
* Update to the final CACAO 0.99.4 release.
* Security Vulnerability Fixes for OpenJDK:
- 6522586: Enforce limits on Font creation.
** Description changed:
- To provide proper integration with ubufox, plugins should also put a
- link for their binary in
+ To provide proper integration with ubufox,
+
+ 1. plugins that use update-alternatives mechanism should also put a link
+ for their binary in
This bug was fixed in the package totem - 2.25.90-0ubuntu3
---
totem (2.25.90-0ubuntu3) jaunty; urgency=low
* debian/control{.in}: add XB-Npp-Description and XB-Npp-Filename
header to the totem-mozilla package to improve ubufox/ubuntu plugin db
integration (LP: #272010)
21 matches
Mail list logo
