[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-05-02 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Marking as fixed. Feel free to reopen if you still have the issue ** Changed in: gnome-vfs2 (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Fix Released -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-25 Thread Tor Harald Thorland
Just for the info: I use 14 seconds to open a share with 500 folders inside. That is from i doubble click it, till the content is fully shown. (And it is only the first time, guess it is some cache somewhere). So I will say that browsing a share is usable, and this is over wireless. Ipw2200

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-23 Thread clast
it is still rather slow, i don't how it was before the update though! sometimes the shares can't be displayed the first time you try. i have to hit reload almost everytime im browsing the shares of a remote windows computer. besides that it's working better than in breezy :) -- smb access

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-21 Thread Oskar Rubinstein
gnome-vfs2 (2.14.0-0ubuntu2) dapper; urgency=low works for me. -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
This upload has the patch pointed by upstream, could people who noticed smb speed issues comment if that makes it better after restarting their session? gnome-vfs2 (2.14.0-0ubuntu2) dapper; urgency=low . * debian/patches/15_smb_cache_lookup_fix.patch: - fix the smb cache lookup, patch

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-19 Thread clast
Those are some good news, indeed :) So, has the patch already been applied? I don't want to push anyone, just trying to close some bugs ;-) clast -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-19 Thread phonic
I just noticed this bug after googling for slow network in Dapper. I have the same problem. Local Network browsing is useable but slow, across the wireless network it is pretty close to unusable. If I can help in anyway Both machines are using Realtech chipset Belkin cards, but from whats

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-15 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Attachment added: debdiff of the patched version http://librarian.launchpad.net/2124270/smb.patch -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-15 Thread Frank Niedermann
rubinstein, sorry I'm a bit late but I can confirm the behavior you have. frank -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-14 Thread Matt Zimmerman
Could someone attach (a non-HTML-mangled version of) the patch linked above? -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-13 Thread James Stembridge
I can confirm that the problem here with excessive connections occurs here too and that the patch linked to above fixes the problem. -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-11 Thread rubinstein
Yes, that's it. I checked with SWAT, and I have hundreds of smb processes, and I'm the only user. With Breezy, there are only a handful of open processes. Applying the patch from http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-vfs-list/2006-March/msg00048.html should fix this bug. Good news indeed. --

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-07 Thread Daniel Holbach
Do any of you have access to that samba server and can check if it is suffering from a high load or millions of smbd processes or something? http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-vfs-list/2006-March/msg00048.html could be related. ** Changed in: gnome-vfs2 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed =

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-05 Thread Asd Rhyme
I am also having the same problem. Yesterday my samba was working fine with 5.10 but as today i upgraded to dapper it is quite slow. -- smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/34203 -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 34203] Re: smb access almost unusable slow in Dapper compared to Breezy

2006-04-02 Thread rubinstein
Thanks Sebastien, appreciate what you do, we know you work like mad :-) Just for the record: Tried fedora core 5 and smb browsing via nautilus was quite snappy, so it must be (at least a little bit) Ubuntu-specific. Nevertheless, interesting news: I get very slow browsing when I use the