[Bug 347225] Re: evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

2010-09-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gtkhtml Status: Invalid = Expired ** Changed in: gtkhtml Importance: Unknown = Critical -- evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 347225] Re: evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

2010-04-19 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
Upstream is requesting more info, is this still an issue with 2.28 on Lucid? ** Changed in: gtkhtml3.14 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Incomplete -- evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347225 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 347225] Re: evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

2010-04-17 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gtkhtml Status: New = Incomplete -- evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 347225] Re: evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

2009-05-13 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gtkhtml Status: Unknown = New -- evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 347225] Re: evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

2009-04-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for sending the bug to GNOME ** Changed in: gtkhtml3.14 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Triaged ** Also affects: gtkhtml via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576420 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

[Bug 347225] Re: evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

2009-03-23 Thread Noam Lewis
** Attachment added: gdb logs (backtraces, register info) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24250116/gdb-evolution.log ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24250117/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt

[Bug 347225] Re: evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

2009-03-23 Thread Noam Lewis
Firstly, I was about to attach a core dump but realized that it probably contains sensitive information (this is my email client...) I'm leaving the process alive (being traced) for a while, if you have any ideas of things i can do to find the bug. Secondly, Apparently it's stuck in this

[Bug 347225] Re: evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

2009-03-23 Thread Sebastien Bacher
thank you for your bug report, can you add an email example to the bug? ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs

[Bug 347225] Re: evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

2009-03-23 Thread Sebastien Bacher
you might also open the bug on bugzilla.gnome.org where the people writting the code will read it -- evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug

Re: [Bug 347225] Re: evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

2009-03-23 Thread Noam Lewis
I can't because i don't know if it will be reproducible (probably not easily) I should add that the email was in Hebrew and therefore, in the right-to-left direction (which is probably relevant) On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote: thank you for your bug

Re: [Bug 347225] Re: evolution hangs, 100% cpu, apparently in gtk html lib

2009-03-23 Thread Noam Lewis
Bug opened in bugzilla: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576420 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Noam Lewis len...@gmail.com wrote: I can't because i don't know if it will be reproducible (probably not easily) I should add that the email was in Hebrew and therefore, in the