I have successfully tested the package in -proposed. With the updated
package, I was able to add and remove users, change parameters, etc.
** Tags added: verification-done
** Tags removed: verification-needed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
This bug was fixed in the package system-tools-backends -
2.9.4-0ubuntu1.1
---
system-tools-backends (2.9.4-0ubuntu1.1) lucid-proposed; urgency=low
* debian/patches/03-lp616682.patch: backport fixes from 2.10.0 to fix
various issues (LP: #616682):
- Fix crash on
Any testers of the lucid-proposed package? As this has been in -proposed
for a long time already, I'll remove the proposed package soon if there
is no feedback. Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
Accepted system-tools-backends into lucid-proposed, the package will
build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback
here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for
documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Tags added:
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/system-tools-backends
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616682
Title:
Backport system-tools-backends 2.10.0
I've prepared an SRU for lucid based on a minimal backport from 2.10.0.
See the attached debdiff.
** Patch added: debdiff for SRU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/system-tools-backends/+bug/616682/+attachment/1757391/+files/system-tools-backends_2.9.4-0ubuntu1.1.debdiff
** Changed
Thanks for the diff!
Looks good to me, except that the change log line:
- Identify users and groups by login instead of UID (LP: #533870, LP: #542183)
is wrong: Bug 533870 is a crash on amd64 too, not a login vs. UID issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Thanks for taking a look. Unfortunately, I have already uploaded it to
-proposed.
I don't think it's worth another upload just to fix the changelog.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu.
No, I don't think it is. ;-) As long as the right number is listed...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616682
Title:
Backport system-tools-backends
Marc Deslauriers [2010-12-06 15:18 -]:
Thanks for taking a look. Unfortunately, I have already uploaded it to
-proposed.
For the record, you can just upload again with the fixed changelog
(same version number), I'll reject the previous one once I get to
reviewing the queue.
--
You
@Martin:
Ah! I didn't know I could do that. I just re-uploaded with a fixed
changelog. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616682
Title:
Backport
Looks ok, please upload. Thanks, Milan and Chris!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to system-tools-backends in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616682
Title:
Backport system-tools-backends 2.10.0 to Lucid
--
This is basically the upstream diff, minus autotools cruft and
translations, which looks much more palatable
** Attachment added: diff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/system-tools-backends/+bug/616682/+attachment/1751156/+files/diff
--
Backport system-tools-backends 2.10.0 to
Thanks Chris! But we really don't need to backport 2.10.1, 2.10.0 will
be enough. 2.10.1 only brings in a few improvements that are used by the
gnome-system-tools 2.32, which are not in Lucid. This removes most of
the changes (in terms of lines of code), which makes the SRU even safer.
--
I've marked the main task invalid since this is already in Maverick, but
approved the Lucid task so that this bug remains open.
** Also affects: system-tools-backends (Ubuntu Lucid)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: system-tools-backends (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
Thanks for this suggestion! I think that the easiest way to move this
forward (i.e. the way most likely to be accepted) would be to prepare a
targeted backport of just the bug-fixes, without things like whitespace
changes, translation updates (which would need to go in language packs
for an
Seriously, I've moved on to other things since Lucid has been released -
glad to know SRUs are considered even when they are that old, though!
;-)
The only translation change between Lucid and Maverick package is in one
file and for two strings, so definitely not something to care about. If
** Attachment added: system-tools-backends_2.9.4-0ubuntu1_2.10.0-2.diff.gz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616682/+attachment/1485650/+files/system-tools-backends_2.9.4-0ubuntu1_2.10.0-2.diff.gz
** Changed in: system-tools-backends (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Description
18 matches
Mail list logo
