I'm seeing this too (on Fedora 15, actually). I've filed a bug upstream
here:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648224
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #648224
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648224
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I'm also sorely missing a system monitor applet for Unity. An indicator
applet might be OK. As another approach, perhaps System Monitor could
show a graph indicating CPU activity inside its icon in the Unity
Launcher. (That's how it works on a Mac, by the way.)
--
You received this bug
mannheim,
that's a good point. I've updated the upstream ticket
(http://trac.yorba.org/ticket/2581) to be called optionally rotate JPEG
pixels, and I agree it would be good to offer this as an option. We
could offer to rotate at export time and/or when importing.
--
You received this bug
Sebastien, we're planning to release 0.12.3 in the next week or two,
including this fix and a couple of other low-risk changes. So if I were
you I'd wait for our tarball. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
Reto, what version of Shotwell are you using? What version of Ubuntu
are you running? Could you generate a stack trace and attach it to this
ticket? See
http://redmine.yorba.org/projects/shotwell/wiki/ShotwellFAQ#I-found-a
-bug-in-Shotwell-How-can-I-report-it
--
You received this bug
In 0.12 we changed Shotwell so that if a top-level DCIM directory is
present on your camera or card, Shotwell looks only in that directory
and no others. We did this to avoid importing lots of useless
thumbnails on Android phones (see http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1903).
Do you have a DCIM
Yes, it would be great to allow people to migrate easily from Mac OS.
Importing photos from iPhoto and Aperture is probably not too hard.
Importing edits and metadata might be harder since it's not clear that
these programs store data in any publicly documented format.
I've created tickets for
The workaround for now is simply to open the camera or memory card in
Nautilus, and drag the videos from the directory where they live into
Shotwell. Obviously that's not ideal, and I'd like to do better for
Shotwell 0.13:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5160
In theory we could add a settings
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 981406 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981406
Thanks for the bug report. This bug is known upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4966
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 981406 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/981406
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 981406
Bottom part of Shotwell window missing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
melenzb: Thanks for your patience. I know it can be frustrating when
you like a piece of software but one important bug is blocking you.
We'll fix this when we can, hopefully soon. In the meantime, I'm glad
you know how to hack the code to work around the problem yourself. :)
--
You received
melenzb: The Shotwell icon also fails to show up for me when I build
Shotwell myself. Not sure why - I've been meaning to look into this at
some point. For some other developers at Yorba the icon shows up fine
in their own build.
Clint: The configure option --unity-support is actually unrelated
Actually it appears that the Unity sidebar displays a generic folder
icon whenever Shotwell is run from the build directory but hasn't been
installed. I consider this a bug, and just created a ticket upstream:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5176
--
You received this bug notification because
Adrián,
in the screenshot you attached Shotwell isn't in full screen mode - it's
maximized, which is not the same thing. If you move your mouse to the
top of the screen, you should see three small buttons appear in the
upper left. If you click the third of those buttons, Shotwell will
This bug is known upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5071
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856970
Title:
shotwell crashed with SIGABRT in
Thanks for the bug report. This is a known bug which was fixed in
Shotwell 0.12.3:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5078
I believe that 0.12.3 should be coming to Precise any day now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
Each Shotwell import (whether manual or via auto-import) creates a fresh
set of events. So if an import includes a photo taken on May 4, and
then a following import includes another photo taken on May 4, then you
will see May 4 twice in the sidebar. (You can easily merge these events
if you
We just committed a fix upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971080
Title:
First run propose to import only one photo from the media inserted
To manage
Shotwell has this feature already. Select a photo, then choose
Edit-Duplicate.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
Another user reported a similar crash a few months back. We have a
ticket for this upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4805
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
Shotwell itself does not use lcms; it uses libraw, which depends on
lcms1 in Ubuntu. Note that libraw 0.13.8 (present in Oneiric) can build
using either lcms1 or lcms2. So to solve this particular dependency I
suspect that you only need to update your libraw packaging to build
using lcms2. You
Till: Yes, there really is a libraw. :) You're not seeing it because
on Ubuntu Shotwell is built using libraw as a static library, so libraw
is compiled into the Shotwell executable. It would be nice to use a
shared library instead, but we can't do that at the moment because
libraw.so currently
For Shotwell, this is ticketed upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/421 .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882825
Title:
Does not save the configuration file
I was mistaken: the libraw shared library is available in an Ubuntu
package today ('libraw2'). We should build Shotwell to use this shared
library and depend on this package. I've ticketed that as #890372.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
...and we also need libraw itself to link to lcms2 rather than lcms1.
I've ticketed that as bug #890379.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gimp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885324
Title:
Completely
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 894553 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894553
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 894553
Writing metadata to files... never finishes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 887357 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357
This is a duplicate of bug 887357. The bug has been fixed for the
upcoming release of Shotwell (0.12).
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 887357
send to... broken
--
You received this bug
Right. This is the same as upstream bug
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4040 , more or less.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964613
Title:
Can't see .jpg image in
Yes, that would be nice. This feature request is known upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/2797
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965683
Title:
Should
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 887357 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357
This is a duplicate of bug 887357. The bug has been fixed in Shotwell
0.12.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 887357
send to... broken
--
You received this bug notification because you are
We have a new upstream ticket for this issue:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4950
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638321
Title:
Shotwell accepts f-spot tags with
Public bug reported:
I'm running Epiphany 3.4.0.1 on Ubuntu 12.04. Whenever I try to add a
bookmark, Epiphany hangs and consumes 100% CPU.
The bug does not occur on Fedora 17, so this may be related to Ubuntu's
changes to GTK. The hang occurs inside
gtk_scrolled_window_size_allocate(), so it
Oddly, if I enable overlay scrollbars (by installing liboverlay-
scrollbar3) then everything works fine. This hang only occurs when
overlay scrollbars are disabled.
** Summary changed:
- adding a bookmark hangs Epiphany
+ adding a bookmark hangs Epiphany if overlay scrollbars are disabled
--
Also, if I switch to the Adwaita theme then everything works fine. The
hang only occurs when I use the default Ambiance theme with overlay
scrollbars disabled.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 971468 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971468
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 971468
Doesn't start: libgexiv2.so.0 = not found
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 971468 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971468
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 971468
Doesn't start: libgexiv2.so.0 = not found
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 971468 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/971468
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 971468
Doesn't start: libgexiv2.so.0 = not found
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
A user reported this problem a year ago, but then it seemed to go away
with Natty alpha 2:
bug #700678
The upstream ticket was http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3084 .
What kind of camera do you have?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which
Aha, yes, I can reproduce this now. Thanks for the explanation.
I've filed a ticket upstream at http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4997 .
We should definitely fix this for the next Shotwell release.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug
A minimize button alone wouldn't help, since Shotwell doesn't allow you
to interact with the program while publishing is in progress. What you
really want is this:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/2318 (publish in background)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Odd. I'm also on 12.04 but am completely unable to reproduce this.
I've ticketed this upstream:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5027
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
Good point. (On the other hand, it could be said that you have to
completely trust *any* software that you run on your local machine, at
least with today's operating system architectures. Even if Shotwell
doesn't ask for your password directly, if the software is malicious it
could install a
Thanks for the bug report. The screenshot you attached does look
unusual. How did you get into this state? Did you maximize the
Shotwell window, or attempt to enter full-screen mode (e.g by pressing
F11)? Or did you merely double click the photo to open it? Does this
happen every time you run
This bug was marked as a duplicate of a private bug. That seems wrong.
I've removed the duplicate status.
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of private bug 970159
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
This crash is happening during import time in GStreamer code, probably
due to a specific video file. It would be helpful to have a log file.
Could you run Shotwell from the command line like this?
$ SHOTWELL_LOG=1 shotwell
Then attempt the import again. Does it crash again? If so, could you
Odd. Could you try this? Run Shotwell from a terminal:
$ shotwell
Now double click an image. If the display looks wrong, do you see any
error messages or other output in the terminal window?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
Also, are you using a theme other than the default (Ambiance)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/976060
Title:
Shotwell - no toolbar!
To manage notifications about
Hm. Are you starting Shotwell in a maximized state? We know that can
lead to display glitches:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4966
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
We're not able to reproduce this so it may be challenging to fix, but we
can look at the log file above and maybe that will give us some clues.
I've just targeted the upstream bug for the next release of Shotwell
(0.13). We'll see what we can do.
--
You received this bug notification because
Dmitry,
if this problem currently occurs every time you start Shotwell, could
you do the following?
1. Generate a log file following the steps in comment #3 above.
2. Look at the log file to see which photo(s) are being processed endlessly.
3. Send email to shotw...@yorba.org and attach your
Dmitry,
good news: I figured out how to reproduce this, so I don't need anything
more from you. I posted a list of steps to the upstream ticket
(http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4297). We should be able to fix this
for 0.13.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I can't reproduce this. I'm running shotwell 0.12.2-0ubuntu2 on Ubuntu
12.10 on a MacBook with Nvidia graphics.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/984560
Title:
Thanks for the bug report. We've never seen any of these behaviors at
Yorba (where Shotwell is developed), so I strongly suspect these are
releated to XFCE/Xubuntu. Unfortunately we don't have the resources to
debug XFCE-specific problems, so you may want to ask the XFCE or Xubuntu
developers
Odd. I've opened a ticket upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5100
How many photos are in your library? While the Unity progress bar is
advancing, do you see a progress bar within Shotwell indicating what is
going on?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
We can reproduce this at Yorba. We'll fix this soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/987046
Title:
shotwell's unity progress bar hangs halfway across
To manage
No promises, but we can try to look at this for Shotwell 0.13.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689139
Title:
Shotwell doesn't import across symbolic link
To
** Attachment added: screenshot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807627/+attachment/2197696/+files/screenshot
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/807627
Title:
Public bug reported:
I'm running Epiphany 3.0.3 on Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric) using the default
theme.
Normally, the URL in the URL bar appears black on a light gray background and
is easy to read. While a page is loading, however, the URL is in white text on
a light gray background and is
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 887357 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/887357
This is a duplicate of #887357, reported upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4432. It has been fixed in Shotwell
0.11.92 (currently available in Ubuntu Precise).
** This bug has been marked a
This is filed as a Shotwell bug, but has nothing to do with Shotwell.
So I'm marking this as invalid - please reopen or refile this under a
different Ubuntu component.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Romano,
the gphoto bug has been fixed in the latest libgphoto, version 2.4.12.
That version is not yet available in Ubuntu Precise, but should appear
there soon. We're still not completely sure whether that will solve the
RW2 problem in Shotwell, however; see
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3428
This bug is known and has been fixed in trunk. See
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4775
We'll be releasing Shotwell 0.11.93 including the bug fix early next
week.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
This flickering was caused by a recent GTK update, and has been fixed in
trunk: see http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4775 . We're planning to
issue a new release 0.11.93 next week including the fix.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You received this
This is a known bug: Shotwell does not correctly handle dates before
1969. If you try to give photos dates earlier than that, you may get
unpredictable results including incorrect sorting. See
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/3040
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 941464 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941464
This is a duplicate of bug 941464, and is known upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4775 . The bug has been fixed in trunk.
The fix will be in Shotwell 0.11.93, coming this week.
** This bug has
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 941464 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941464
OK - maybe this is not an exact duplicate of bug 941464 (which describes
flickering while importing). The underlying cause is the same, however.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Romano: thanks for your observations, but we prefer that a bug ticket
such as this one be focused on only one issue (RW2 support in this
case). If you want to report a number of small problems, you could send
a message to the Shotwell mailing list. Or you could file tickets for
those problems
Maui: thanks for letting us know that you're still not seeing RW2 files
in Shotwell. It's difficult for us to test this since we don't have a
camera that shoots RW2 here at Yorba, but we'll see what we can do.
Most GNOME programs (such as Nautilus or gedit or Totem) require the
latest versions
Romano: yes, an SD image like that would be extremely helpful if it lets
us reproduce this problem here at Yorba. If you can share an image with
us via UbuntuOne (or post a download link) then we can take a look.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
Actually, we would like to evolve Shotwell so that all metadata edits
and changes are always stored in files, not only in the database.
There are several ways this can happen:
- we can write metadata changes to the original photo file (which is what
happens when this checkbox is checked today)
-
Great. I downloaded the tar.gz and extracted it onto an SD card. For
me, Shotwell shows the card as a Mass Storage Camera and correctly
displays the RW2 and JPEG images (see attached screenshot). I'm able to
import them just fine. I'm using Ubuntu 12.04, Shotwell from git
master, libraw
** Attachment added: import.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shotwell/+bug/853373/+attachment/2824653/+files/import.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
What happens if you run Shotwell again? Does the crash occur every time
you try to start it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947561
Title:
shotwell crashed with
Maui: Debian testing will often not have the latest packages. Even
Debian experimental will sometimes have older packages than the
alpha/beta releases of commercially supported distributions such as
Ubuntu and Fedora. Debian is an awesome community project, but because
the commercially supported
This has been fixed upstream: Shotwell will now search only the DCIM
directory if it is present. The fix is present in 0.11.93 and will be
in the upcoming 0.12 release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/958784
Title:
downloaded pictures detected as duplicates
To manage
Actually I think this is just a specific instance of a more general
problem, which is that dragging and dropping from Shotwell works only to
Nautilus, not to other applications. This is
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1563 . (See also bug #821915 , which is
another instance of this.)
** Changed
This seems worth investigating. I've ticketed this upstream:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4649
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/916441
Title:
Thanks for the bug report. This bug is known upstream:
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4262
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923325
Title:
Setting Developer to
I see this too. I've ticketed this upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4715 . We'll look into this right away.
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
This looks like bug http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4201 upstream. As
described in comments #5 and #7 on that ticket, the rename operation can
lead to a crash or other unpredictable behavior. The bug has been fixed
for the next release of Shotwell, version 0.12. The fix is also present
in the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 830594 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830594
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 830594
ShotWell crashes while writing metadata to files.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
Right. We used to use Trac to track bugs at Yorba, but we switched to
Redmine about a year ago. Launchpad can't (yet) link to Redmine bugs,
so for now we just add a comment like this:
This has also been reported upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5622 .
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
In Quantal, there is no About item in the Nautilus menu, so it's hard to
tell what version of Nautilus I'm running.
In upstream Nautilus from GNOME there is an About menu item, which
appears in the app menu. Ubuntu does not display this menu, so I have
no way to get to this
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #681394
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681394
** Also affects: nautilus via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681394
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
That's interesting to hear. If Quantal goes back to Nautilus 3.4, will
Ubuntu plan to update to later versions of Nautilus in the future, or
will it just stay at 3.4 indefinitely (which would be a fork,
essentially)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Sebastien: that's interesting - all good to know.
For the record, Marlin is actually written mostly in C, not Vala. (I
just looked at the source and counted 57K lines of C and 9K of Vala.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
Thanks for the bug report. I think this is a bug: Shotwell should use
LC_TIME to determine the time format used for displaying messages,
independently of other environment variable settings. This bug is known
upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/2462
--
You received this bug
This bug is known upstream at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5601
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039722
Title:
org.yorba.shotwell
To manage notifications
Pierre,
do you still see this happening? If so, could you follow the bug
reporting instructions in the Shotwell FAQ to generate a log file and
attach it to this bug or to the upstream ticket at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5434? Thanks!
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status:
Public bug reported:
Today I installed a fresh daily build of 12.10 and applied software
updates, which installed shotwell 0.12.90-0ubuntu1. When I select a
photo and press Publish, Shotwells offers Pigiwo as the only publishing
destination. (In Preferences-Plugins, other destinations such as
I started Online Accounts and added a Facebook account. Now when I run
Shotwell I see Facebook listed as a publishing destination in addition
to Piwigo.
So now I'm starting to realize: is this the expected behavior? The user
must create accounts for Facebook/Flickr/Google in Online Accounts,
It's http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5596 .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042969
Title:
Shotwell publishes only to Piwigo
To manage notifications about this
This was fixed 5 months ago in trunk (see the upstream ticket at
http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4297) and so the fix will be present in
the upcoming 0.13 release. If you'd like the fix today, you can either
install Shotwell from the Yorba daily PPA
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1042969 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1042969
This is a duplicate of bug #1042969.
To see entries for Facebook, Flickr and so on in Shotwell, currently you
must first run Ubuntu Online Accounts to set up accounts for those
services. We realize that
I see this too. I've created an Ubuntu Online Account for Google, but
when I try to publish to Picasa I see the same error.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shotwell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046776
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 932520 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932520
I believe this is a duplicate of bug #932520, which has been fixed in
Quantal. See also http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/4966 .
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 932520
Some windows on start
Can you reproduce this, or does it just seem to occur randomly? Does
this occur in the main Library view, or when viewing a tag or event?
** Changed in: shotwell (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
Alberto, I don't understand. Today, I can select a service and log in,
but that doesn't block me from selecting another service. Couldn't we
remove the buttons and simply log in automatically whenever the user
selects any service? Why would the service selector need to be a dialog
in this case?
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1046461 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046461
This is a duplicate of bug #1046461 (see comment #1 on that bug). See
also bug #1042969 and http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/5596 .
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1046461
[UIFe] UOA
1 - 100 of 236 matches
Mail list logo
