This is an issue in nautilus that it is laying out the icons improperly.
Nautilus knows that the blank area is blank, and just should take that
into account when calculating icon positions.
** Package changed: xorg-server (Ubuntu) = nautilus (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Right, nautilus appears to have gotten confused here.
I *think* there's nothing we need to alter on the X side, so will close
out the X task.
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop
@Eric, can you also confirm the issue is not reproducible on oneiric?
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in
** Summary changed:
- Dual Monitor wallpaper is not scaling across both monitors, same background
is repeated on both monitors instead
+ [Patch upstream] Dual Monitor wallpaper is not scaling across both monitors,
same background is repeated on both monitors instead
** Changed in:
** Summary changed:
- Workflow for changing monitor configuration is misleading
+ Apply button should be inactivated if there are no changes to apply
** Tags added: precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome
When I plug in a monitor to my notebook (ubuntu 9.04) I can mirror my
- image or enlarge my desktop to display sth on the second device with
- gnome-display-properties.
+ image or enlarge my desktop to display something on the second
** Tags added: precise
** Summary changed:
- monitor layout should be 'normalized' after each drag'n'drop operation
+ monitor canvas should be 'normalized' after each drag'n'drop operation
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
Theoretically this ought to be doable but it sounds like something that
could break a lot of code assumptions and might be a heck of a lot of
work to fully implement and make reliable. I think a more detailed
justification for this is needed.
jerzyo, if you're still around could you please
** Tags added: precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386824
Title:
gnome-display-properties needs centering snap-to points
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
I assume the point is that they want to have mirroring but still run
each display at their native resolution.
The clipping on the smaller monitor would likely be quite confusing,
although perhaps if panning is utilized the setup would be usable.
In any case, I think the use case for this
Bug #287062
Bug #275977
Bug #297706
These bugs are all in state fix released now.
This dialog was an interim measure for dealing with X not able to handle
the situation dynamically as it does today.
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received
Primary monitor support has improved, both in gnome-panel and in unity,
and it can now be configured in the gnome-display-properties applet,
which should take care of the underlying issues described here.
The issue of having the applet functionality available from the desktop
context menu seems
Could someone test if this is still an issue with Ubuntu natty? I
suspect the issue is gone now.
If you don't want to install Ubuntu Precise, it should be sufficient to
boot a Live USB session, configure the monitors, and see if it is
working properly now. You can get the current Live USB
** No longer affects: x-kit (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/240916
Title:
can't configure display resolution (monitor, graphics card) manually
in gui
To manage
** Attachment added: Screenshot-unblanked.png
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/119406/+attachment/2643290/+files/Screenshot-unblanked.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
Seems to be working properly as of Ubuntu Precise, at least on Intel
graphics.
Feel free to reopen with further details if it's not working for you.
** Attachment added: Screenshot-locked.png
Reproduced on precise.
** Tags added: precise
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
** Changed in: ayatana-design
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
You've got the laptop and external monitor set to mirrored. Mirrored
means Make both monitors look the same so X has to select a resolution
that both monitors have in common. LVDS1 supports 1280x800, 1024x768,
800x600, and 640x480. VGA1 supports 1280x1024, 1024x768, 800x600,
640x480, and
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Tags removed: apport-crash i386 need-i386-retrace
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907130
Title:
[Don't delete the core or run this through the retracer. Usually the
retracer fails and deletes the core and then the bug becomes
unactionable. Keeping the core gives the option of manually retracing
later.]
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You
Closing as expired since it has been several months waiting for
information.
It's likely the newer kernel in precise does not have this bug.
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
It's actually not as simple as that; resolutions are not just pluggable
numbers, but are actually calculated from 'modelines' which describe the
physical CRT or LCD drawing behaviors and refresh cycle rates which are
fairly specific to a given piece of hardware.
So, you can't take a given
* I have to use the proprietary NVidia driver because the open source driver
STILL does not support multiple cards.
Known issue with most all the FOSS video drivers. Bug #316514
* I have to enable Xinerama to be able to drag windows between monitors. If I
don't I get completely separate
I attempted to reproduce it in Precise with Unity. Following the steps
in the original report, the login dialog appears as expected on my
Fujitsu laptop.
The login dialog is offcenter and the background is sized to the laptop
rather than the external screen (separate bug?), but the dialog itself
The error message comes from this patch to gnome-desktop:
./debian/patches/100_load_desired_settings.patch:+
X server does not support size requested);
So, gnome is attempting to load your existing ~/.config/monitors.xml
however in some situations gnome will attempt to use Xrandr 1.2
Btw, I expect this still affects Precise, but if someone would like to
verify that, it would boost the priority of this bug for our development
work.
If you don't want to install Ubuntu Precise, it should be sufficient to
boot a Live USB session, configure the monitors, and see if it is
working
Hi Philipp,
Good to hear the error message is corrected now. Of course, the
remaining problem sounds worse. But it's hard to guess what might be
going wrong. Having some sort of logs or other details might help.
I'm not sure why your gsd-debug-randr.log is not getting produced; that
would be
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850427
Title:
[Displays] Too easy to
** Tags added: precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/850427
Title:
[Displays] Too easy to set a configuration where borders do not quite
match
To
Thanks for attaching the dmesg output with debugging turned on. Looking
through it I do notice this bit which looks possibly complicit in this
issue:
[ 515.630872] [drm:intel_prepare_page_flip], preparing flip with no unpin work?
[ 515.683339] [drm:intel_wait_for_vblank], vblank wait timed out
** Summary changed:
- configuration of external monitor on laptop does not work properly
+ configuration of external monitor on laptop causes lvds to remain black
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center
I think this *might* be a duplicate (or at least variant) of bug
#828623.
** Summary changed:
- configuration of external monitor on laptop causes lvds to remain black
+ configuration of external monitor on laptop with DisplayPort causes lvds to
remain black
--
You received this bug
@Andrè, ping?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811339
Title:
gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in
gnome_rr_config_load_current()
To manage
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome-control-center
in the display manager gnome-control-center, it has a thumbnail image
displays. of these miniatures, we have a mini panel. Can we choose the
- main screen with drag and drop this mini panel ... The Bug Is That Is
- The
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 800136 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/800136
** Summary changed:
- No easy way to configure default monitor
+ No easy way to configure primary display
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 800136
Redesign display settings panel under unity
Was able to reproduce on Precise with a laptop and ext display with
docking station, using seb128's steps.
** Tags added: precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
Allowing two displays to overlap and show different sized viewports of
the same desktop is totally permissible by X11 with RANDR. I can't
think of any particular use case where you'd *want* it set up that way,
but technically it is a permissible configuration as far as X is
concerned. It is more
** Description changed:
Using 4.22 in Oneiric with a dell laptop docked lid closed and with the
internal screen enabled and placed under the external one in the
xrandr capplet (dunno how that happened but it's the config I got on lid
close and I can reproduce it manually by dnding the
Photo showing what this configuration problem looks like.
** Attachment added: 100_2566.JPG
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/868354/+attachment/2636716/+files/100_2566.JPG
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which
** Summary changed:
- black screen when dim scrren to save power
+ black screen when dim screen to save power
** Description changed:
My macbook 2,1 goes to energy saving mode and dims the screen. But when I
touch any key, the screen remains black
- As workaround, I type my password to
** Summary changed:
- Displays utility doesn't offer to use nvidia-settings with proprietary
drivers installed?
+ Display utility doesn't offer to use nvidia-settings with proprietary drivers
installed?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
Yes, I agree this sounds like it's not gnome-terminal at fault.
Typically issues like these are video driver problems and tend to be
hardware-specific. The fact that several people are seeing it on
different graphics cards and different drivers is likely coincidental.
A lot of different kinds of
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 877438 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877438
A couple other details which would help for classifying performance
bugs:
* If you have a multi-head arrangement, are you using twinview or
xinerama (or xrandr for non-nvidia drivers)?
* Do you experience
** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) = rhythmbox (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899141
Title:
anna
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Opinion
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Status: Opinion = Confirmed
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a
[I have switched from using CDs to USB sticks so no longer care about
this bug.]
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/419781
Title:
Dialog displays writing to
It's been over a year without any indication of a problem that disabling
acpid in xserver would solve, so I'm going to close this for now. If
anyone can make a case for why to remove it, reopen this bug and let us
know.
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Won't Fix
--
(Or if you can't reopen the bug since it's in state wontfix, please file
a new bug against xorg-server.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496859
Title:
MASTER: acpid
Given no one else seems to have complained about this, coupled with it
sounding like getting the doc fix backported would be prohibitively
hard, the lucid task is probably doesn't have a high enough bang for the
buck to do it.
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status:
I do think the docs should be fixed for the upcoming Precise LTS.
Thanks for the invitation to produce a patch for this, but I have only a
fuzzy working knowledge of how time slewing is being implemented.
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in:
This does look like a bug we had a few releases ago, which has since
been resolved.
Feel free to reopen bug if you can reproduce it on Oneiric, but since
there's been no recent comments I'm guessing not.
** Changed in: sound-juicer (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Released
--
You
** Changed in: xchat (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: xchat (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882825
[The Design Team has identified this as a blocker issue for precise, so
setting the Importance to Critical. This may be adjusted down once the
bug has received further design and engineering analysis, if
appropriate.]
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium = Critical
[The Design Team has identified this as a blocker issue for precise, so
setting the Importance to Critical. This may be adjusted down once the
bug has received further design and engineering analysis, if
appropriate.]
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low = Critical
--
[The Design Team has identified this as a blocker issue for precise, so
setting the Importance to Critical. This may be adjusted down once the
bug has received further design and engineering analysis, if
appropriate.]
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: High = Critical
[The Design Team has identified this as a blocker issue for precise, so
setting the Importance to Critical. This may be adjusted down once the
bug has received further design and engineering analysis, if
appropriate.]
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low = Critical
--
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome-control-center
Following instructions for testing external monitor on a laptop in
http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Hardware/GFX/ExternalPrimary
the resolutions of the external monitor are not detected properly. When I try
to change them,
@Andrea, thanks for your work on this! Could you post a link to the
code you've done, that can be reviewed?
I've added tasks to the Next Actions section of the description.
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome-control-center
in the display manager gnome-control-center, it
The design team flagged this as a possible critical issue for us to
solve in the development release (and SRU to natty and/or oneiric, if
the fixes are suitable and appropriate to backport).
However, I notice this report only has comments from natty users, so I
am wondering if this issue might
Looks like in the recent refactoring work they forgot to check the
rr_outputs pointer before dereferencing it.
Easy enough to check for this situation and bail, but not 100% this is
the right way to solve this bug.
The real question is why screens was undefined to begin with.
** Patch added:
Andrè, are you able to reproduce this bug fairly easily? Can you
describe the steps that lead to this crash?
** Tags added: precise
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Bryce Harrington (bryce)
** Description changed:
I just input a HDMI monitor
It would be great if you could; otherwise please outline what you did to
solve it and one of us can try our hand at it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
@Chris, could you list some next actions for this bug (either by you or
others) that would help in moving it towards a solution?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
Hi Ben Hearsum,
Hmm... I'm not sure I totally understand your description of the problem.
Could you please elaborate and clarify? You may find it helpful to read How
to report bugs effectively
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html or the Ubuntu-X bug
reporting guidelines at
Not enough information has been provided to make this a useful bug
report. See http://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Reporting for instructions on
reporting X issues.
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
** Package changed: xorg (Ubuntu) = gnome-desktop (Ubuntu)
--
You received this
I'm not sure what package controls that, but it's not X...
** Package changed: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) = metacity
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in Ubuntu.
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 507062
synaptic assert failure: synaptic: ../../src/xcb_io.c:385: _XAllocID:
Assertion `ret != inval_id' failed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in Ubuntu.
As per my comment on bug #507062, unduping this bug until more
definitive evidence can be gathered that this is the same bug; apport
unfortunately could not get a proper stacktrace for this one. Would you
mind collecting one by hand via gdm? I think that would probably help.
Or, if you could
As per the upstream bug report and my last few comments, this was
pinpointed to a bug in metacity rather than X.
I think it may be resolved in metacity, as well, since it's been a long
time since I saw this.
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
You received
Karl, thanks you're right, my script did not check the recent comments.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868400
Title:
Synaptics touchpad stops working
Hey pretto,
Hi, thanks for reporting this issue during the development period of
Ubuntu.
I notice there's not been further comments to the bug report since the
release came out, would you mind updating us on the status of it in the
release?
Are you still able to reproduce the issue? If not,
Hey sabdfl,
Hi, thanks for reporting this issue during the development period of
Ubuntu.
I notice there's not been further comments to the bug report since the
release came out, would you mind updating us on the status of it in the
release?
Are you still able to reproduce the issue? If not,
Hey alexander-weinert,
You filed this bug report against natty, but I see it's still open and
doesn't appear to have much activity recently. So, now that oneiric
is released and stable, this may be a good point for you to upgrade
and re-test if this issue is still present there.
If it's solved
Hey dpm,
You filed this bug report against natty, but I see it's still open and
doesn't appear to have much activity recently. So, now that oneiric
is released and stable, this may be a good point for you to upgrade
and re-test if this issue is still present there.
If it's solved in the new
Hey rogz,
You filed this bug report against natty, but I see it's still open and
doesn't appear to have much activity recently. So, now that oneiric
is released and stable, this may be a good point for you to upgrade
and re-test if this issue is still present there.
If it's solved in the new
Hey llstarks,
You filed this bug report against natty, but I see it's still open and
doesn't appear to have much activity recently. So, now that oneiric
is released and stable, this may be a good point for you to upgrade
and re-test if this issue is still present there.
If it's solved in the
[Quit using xchat-gnome in favor of regular xchat which doesn't have
this bug]
** Changed in: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in Ubuntu.
[Closing as I no longer use xchat-gnome and no one else is subscribed or
marked as affected. xchat seems to have better options for managing
large lists of server/channels.]
** Changed in: xchat-gnome (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
It seems upstream is not favorable to this idea. I have stopped using
xchat-gnome so have no plans to implement it myself. Feel free to close
this bug report if no one else wants the functionality.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
** Also affects: xchat (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to xchat-gnome in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/716607
Title:
Scrolls to top of window when started
Affects both xchat and xchat-gnome
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: xchat-gnome
Steps to reproduce:
- 1. Launch freshly installed (default settings) xchat-gnome
+ 1. Launch freshly installed (default settings) xchat
2. Notice window includes display of timestamps of
Confirmed this is now fixed in natty
** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297807
The X driver doesn't control brightness. Might be an issue in the
userspace daemon. Or some ACPI quirkiness.
** Package changed: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) = gnome-settings-
daemon (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
--
You received
The X driver doesn't control brightness. Might be an issue in the
userspace daemon. Or some ACPI quirkiness.
** Package changed: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) = gnome-settings-
daemon (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
--
You received
Sarvatt suggested this patch went in around that time and might be relevant:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-settings-daemon/commit/?id=67785fa2b1043bd5397669f92abbd210dbf23f24
Also:
Sarvatt * debian/patches/50_add_dell_backlight.patch:
Sarvatt - Add 'dell_backlight' module to
The X driver doesn't control brightness. Might be an issue in the
userspace daemon. Or some ACPI quirkiness.
** Package changed: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) = gnome-settings-
daemon (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
--
You received
Possibly dupe of 872932... similar symptoms around the same time frame.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876711
Title:
Screen brightness resets to
The X driver doesn't control brightness. Might be an issue in the
userspace daemon. Or some ACPI quirkiness.
** Package changed: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) = gnome-settings-
daemon (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
--
You received
Possibly dupe of 872932... similar symptoms around the same time frame.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/873191
Title:
Ubuntu starts with lowest
)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Bryce Harrington (bryce)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
** Changed in: xorg-server (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232078
Title:
The allowed limit of flexible X servers reached
To
Looks likely to be this.
gnome-settings-daemon (3.2.0-0ubuntu4) oneiric; urgency=low
* debian/patches/00git_dont_sleep_on_idle_by_default.patch:
- Don't sleep on idle by default (LP: #860485)
* debian/patches/00git_dont_revert_pre_idle_brigthness.patch:
- Do not revert to the pre-idle
** Package changed: xserver-xorg-video-intel (Ubuntu) = gnome-desktop
(Ubuntu)
** Changed in: gnome-desktop (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-desktop in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Critical
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical = High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in Ubuntu.
Actually the heuristics that manage what to do when hotplugging is in
the gnome control utilities (gnome-rr.c in gnome-desktop). Sounds like
it's not handling things as you expect; refiling (there is no 'xrandr'
package anymore).
** Package changed: xrandr (Ubuntu) = gnome-desktop (Ubuntu)
--
Hi, you've reported several different (discrete) issues in one bug
report, and some of these I think are already reported on other bugs.
There is no 'xrandr' package anymore (even though one is present in
launchpad), so I'm moving this to xorg to be re-triaged. However at
least some of the
The retracer already attached a full backtrace. If it hadn't deleted
the core file I could have helped more.
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
I take it all back. I now have an arrandale laptop on hand for testing
and am able to reproduce the bug exactly as originally reported. I'll
do some diagnostics and report back.
** Tags added: oneiric
** Tags added: rls-mgr-o-tracking
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Visibility changed to: Public
** Summary changed:
- gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()
+ gnome-control-center crashed with SIGSEGV in g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID()
called via gdk_display_get_event ()
** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu)
This is a test machine so nothing private in the CoreDump; please don´t
delete it - could be useful.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/860089
Title:
201 - 300 of 1314 matches
Mail list logo
