[Bug 1881780] Re: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations" without manually typing in the address.

2020-06-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Ah, I think I see what you mean. Nautilus (gvfs actually) is temporarily downgrading the protocol for the discovery, but it's not reverting that when trying to actually connect to a discovered host. Is that it? This does ring a bell, it was supposed to be fixed with an SRU on bionic, and in the

[Bug 1881780] Re: Nautilus requires SMBv1 to work from "Other Locations" without manually typing in the address.

2020-06-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
When you manually connect, by typing in the full smb url, it doesn't mean SMB1 is being used. You can verify that by running "sudo smbstatus" on the server. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1828107] Re: gvfs can't list shares from smb servers that disabled SMB1

2020-06-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This will only get better once another discovery service is used, since SMB1 won't come back. https://github.com/christgau/wsdd is something we could look into -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1872975] [NEW] Asks for reboot even when fw update was not applied

2020-04-15 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: See attached screenshot. I clicked the "Update" button next to a firmware update notification, but my laptop was not connected to AC power. It told me that, but at the same time it told me the update was applied correctly, and that I should reboot. That's wrong.

[Bug 1869897] Re: missing ssh prompt to touch yubikey device when using gnome

2020-04-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Done: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2598 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues #2598 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2598 ** Also affects: gnome-shell via https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2598

[Bug 1869897] Re: missing ssh prompt to touch yubikey device when using gnome

2020-03-31 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: I can't exactly pinpoint which gnome package is responsible for this. It might be gnome-keyring. Let's go with gnome-shell first. - TL;DR openssh 8.2p1 in focal has support for U2F authentication. This is - a new feature we will highlight in the release notes and a

[Bug 1869897] [NEW] missing ssh prompt to touch yubikey device when using gnome

2020-03-31 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: I can't exactly pinpoint which gnome package is responsible for this. It might be gnome-keyring. Let's go with gnome-shell first. TL;DR openssh 8.2p1 in focal has support for U2F authentication. This is a new feature we will highlight in the release notes and a blog post.

[Bug 1850960] ShellJournal.txt

2020-03-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
apport information ** Attachment added: "ShellJournal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960/+attachment/5338385/+files/ShellJournal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1850960] monitors.xml.txt

2020-03-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
apport information ** Attachment added: "monitors.xml.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960/+attachment/5338386/+files/monitors.xml.txt ** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1850960] GsettingsChanges.txt

2020-03-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
apport information ** Attachment added: "GsettingsChanges.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960/+attachment/5338382/+files/GsettingsChanges.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1850960] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2020-03-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960/+attachment/5338383/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1850960] ProcEnviron.txt

2020-03-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960/+attachment/5338384/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1850960] Re: Coming back from suspend, tabs and window are broken

2020-03-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
apport information ** Tags added: focal third-party-packages ** Description changed: When coming back from a suspend on eoan and now focal, the tabs and gnome-terminal window are all broken. Some are maximized, some are not, some have huge fonts, some don't. I have to double click on the

[Bug 1850960] Re: Coming back from suspend, tabs and window are broken

2020-03-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
scale is 100%, screen resolution is at 1920x1080, but it supports more (2ksomethingXsomething, can't remember now). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960 Title:

[Bug 1850960] Re: Coming back from suspend, tabs and window are broken

2020-03-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
hardware is a x1 5th gen laptop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960 Title: Coming back from suspend, tabs and window are broken To manage notifications

[Bug 1850960] Re: Coming back from suspend, tabs and window are broken

2020-03-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I stand corrected in that it doesn't happen every time. I had to try about 4 times to get it to happen again, and it's just with the gnome- terminal window. Here is the requested log. ** Attachment added: "journalctl-b-0.txt"

[Bug 1850960] Re: Coming back from suspend, tabs and window are broken

2020-03-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Happens with every suspend/resume cycle. I'll attach the logs after I come back from lunch, which will be a great opportunity since I'll suspend the laptop. It does not happen with a simple lock/unlock sequence. It has to be coming back from suspend. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1850960] Re: Coming back from suspend, tabs and window are broken

2020-03-17 Thread Andreas Hasenack
It's happening with focal as well. This system was upgraded to focal from eoan. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960 Title: Coming back from suspend, tabs

[Bug 1850960] Re: Coming back from suspend, tabs and window are broken

2020-03-16 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Tags added: champagne -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960 Title: Coming back from suspend, tabs and window are broken To manage notifications about

[Bug 1865943] Re: Drag and drop to desktop area doesn't work

2020-03-04 Thread Andreas Hasenack
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1813441 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813441 ** Summary changed: - Dran and drop to desktop area doesn't work + Drag and drop to desktop area doesn't work -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 1865943] [NEW] Dran and drop to desktop area doesn't work

2020-03-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: If I have a folder window open, and drag a file from it into the desktop area, that is somehow forbidden and the icon just moves back to the folder where it came from, in a "moving" animation. It's almost as if I didn't have filesystem permissions to move it to the desktop.

[Bug 1865942] [NEW] delete key doesn't move desktop files to trash

2020-03-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: When I select an icon in my desktop, be it a folder or file, the "delete" key doesn't do anything with it anymore. I was expecting it to be moved to the trash folder. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: gnome-shell 3.35.91-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature:

[Bug 1865563] [NEW] password box not centered

2020-03-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: When logging in, one of the two isn't centered on screen: either the password input box, or the avatar. See attached photograph. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: gdm3 3.34.1-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-17.21-generic 5.4.22 Uname: Linux

[Bug 1864682] Re: Double notifications: first content, then "app is ready"

2020-02-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Attachment added: "app-is-ready.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1864682/+attachment/5330903/+files/app-is-ready.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1864682] [NEW] Double notifications: first content, then "app is ready"

2020-02-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: I'm getting double notifications in Focal. First, the actual content of the notification, like an irc ping. Then, a few seconds later, another one saying that "App is ready" (hexchat in this case). Attached two screenshots showing this. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease:

[Bug 1850960] Re: Coming back from suspend, tabs and window are broken

2019-11-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: When coming back from a suspend on eoan, the tabs and gnome-terminal window are all broken. Some are maximized, some are not, some have huge fonts, some don't. I have to double click on the title bar (if I can find it), and then double-click again to maximize and

[Bug 1850960] Dependencies.txt

2019-11-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
apport information ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960/+attachment/5302064/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1850960] ProcEnviron.txt

2019-11-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960/+attachment/5302066/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1850960] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2019-11-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850960/+attachment/5302065/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1850960] [NEW] Coming back from suspend, tabs and window are broken

2019-11-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: When coming back from a suspend on eoan, the tabs and gnome-terminal window are all broken. Some are maximized, some are not, some have huge fonts, some don't. I have to double click on the title bar (if I can find it), and then double-click again to maximize and restore the

[Bug 201786] Re: ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines

2019-08-12 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Hi Petrida, could you please elaborate on why you changed the bug status from incomplete to confirmed without providing the requested information from comment #95? ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2 (10.x)

2019-07-31 Thread Andreas Hasenack
sssd master has pcre2 support via https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/677#issuecomment-508238642 eoan is getting 2.2.0, which doesn't have that yet, but getting closer! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1828107] Re: gvfs can't list shares from smb servers that disabled SMB1

2019-06-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Looks like I missed a notification in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/issues/307, I'll followup there -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1828107 Title: gvfs can't

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
No worries, thanks for following up -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778322 Title: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-24 Thread Andreas Hasenack
@bloodyiron, you said in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1778322/comments/81 that you had SMB1 disabled in your network, and I confirmed that with SMB1 disabled there is still a bug, and that bug is https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1828107, and it affects all ubuntu

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-24 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Attachment added: "disco-connect-to-pub.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1778322/+attachment/5272829/+files/disco-connect-to-pub.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-24 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Disco works out of the box wrt this bug specifically. Which is expected since it has the same fix. windows network tab is populated (see disco-windows-network- populated.png) Connecting to the pub share (see disco-connect-to-pub.png). smbstatus shows smb3.11 in the pub connection, and NT1 for

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Attachment added: "cosmic-connecting-to-pub-after-test.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1778322/+attachment/5272234/+files/cosmic-connecting-to-pub-after-test.png ** Tags removed: verification-needed-cosmic ** Tags added: verification-done-cosmic -- You received

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Attachment added: "cosmic-empty-windows-network-before-test.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1778322/+attachment/5272232/+files/cosmic-empty-windows-network-before-test.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Attachment added: "cosmic-populated-windows-network-after-test.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1778322/+attachment/5272233/+files/cosmic-populated-windows-network-after-test.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Cosmic verification First reproducing the bug with these packages: Version table: *** 1.38.1-0ubuntu1.2 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-updates/main amd64 Packages windows network tab is empty (see screenshot cosmic-empty-windows-network-before-test.png) Now

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Attachment added: "empty-windows-network-before-test.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1778322/+attachment/5272225/+files/empty-windows-network-before-test.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Attachment added: "connecting-to-pub-after-test.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1778322/+attachment/5272227/+files/connecting-to-pub-after-test.png ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Bionic desktop verification With gvfs-backends from the release pocket: ubuntu@bionic-desktop:~$ apt-cache policy gvfs-backends gvfs-backends: Installed: 1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3 Candidate: 1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3 Version table: *** 1.36.1-0ubuntu1.3 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-06-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Attachment added: "populated-windows-network-after-test.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1778322/+attachment/5272226/+files/populated-windows-network-after-test.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
@Bloodyiron, please run "nmblookup -M " and check if the machine that is listed has SMB1 disabled or not. If it has SMB1 disabled, then it's https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1828107 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Try the test case in a disco vm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778322 Title: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-08 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The "windows network" tab depends on an election to happen between the smb servers, and a master browser being elected. It's the master browser that is contacted for the list of machines in the network. If that machine has smb1 disabled, for example, then this won't work, because it will hit

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/gvfs/+bug/1828107 for the remaining issue of connecting to machines in the windows network tab that have disabled SMB1. Note that a connection made specifically to the machine/ip still works (smb:///) -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1828107] [NEW] gvfs can't list shares from smb servers that disabled SMB1

2019-05-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: After bug #1778322 is fixed (just needs a gvfs rebuild with newer samba), samba machines will start to show up again in the "windows network" tab in nautilus. But if a server has disabled the SMB1 protocol, nautilus will show an error when that server is clicked on, instead

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I found an upstream issue about not being able to get a share list from a machine that has SMB1 disabled: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/issues/307 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/issues #307 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gvfs/issues/307 -- You received this bug

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Disco shouldn't have this bug. It (gvfs) will have issues connecting to smb servers that have disabled SMB1, just like bionic and everything in between. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-07 Thread Andreas Hasenack
It is, that's all that's needed now. I heard another, unrelated, gvfs SRU was in the works and was hitting problems, though. I have a no-change rebuild in this PPA for bionic: https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/gvfs-rebuild-1778322/ -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
@morbius1, how did you disable smb1 on your test samba server? "server min protocol = SMB2"? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778322 Title: gvfs-smb-browse can't

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Ah, you said so, sorry -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778322 Title: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
@seb128, the test case uses a localhost samba server, with a non-guest pub share pointing at /tmp. Not even that was visible in gnome before this fix. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Nice, that's good to know, thanks for pointing it out. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778322 Title: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree To manage

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
> The original issue was you couldn't get a listing of samba hosts in Nautilus > so > yes that issue is fixed. The original problem also affected linux samba boxes, which do allow smb1 by default still. You couldn't even see them in nautilus. Now you can, and you can browse their shares and

[Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2 (10.x)

2019-05-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Switching zsh back to incomplete, according to previous comment. Thanks for noticing that. ** Changed in: zsh (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2 (10.x)

2019-05-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Thanks for the update, I missed that comment (again). I guess it can be moved back to "triaged" then. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in

[Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2 (10.x)

2019-05-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Regarding apache2, https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57471 is still open, and I just tried a 2.4.38 build with pcre2, and it doesn't work. Switching the task back to incomplete according to the bug instructions. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Incomplete --

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-05-01 Thread Andreas Hasenack
A new rebuild is needed. To verify in another way, check the Depends line of the gvfs-backends package: $ dpkg -s gvfs-backends|grep Depends|grep smbclient Depends: libarchive13 (>= 3.0.4), , libsmbclient (>= 2:4.0.3+dfsg1) versus $ dpkg -s gvfs-backends|grep Depends|grep smbclient

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Yes, please open a separate bug report, and attach your smb.conf there please. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778322 Title: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I think it's exactly getting the share list using NT1 that is failing. I will look at this tomorrow, see what smbclient -L is doing wrt NT1 temporary downgrade. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I indeed think interacting with a server that has disabled SMB1 entirely is a related, but different problem. Can you get smbclient -L to work with such a server, using the netbios hostname, or does it fail when listing the shares? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Does this also happen with Ubuntu Disco? I checked upstream and there were no other changes following this one in that file: commit 6c8bc39f570ea82cf14e83ce7d1dbdbe569d09d1 Author: Ondrej Holy Date: Wed Sep 12 15:28:51 2018 +0200 smbbrowse: Force NT1 protocol version for workgroup support

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-24 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Check your smb.conf, maybe you have some overriding setting in there. The default disco install I tested had no config file. With gvfsd running in debug mode, there is also a specific message you can look for which will tell you if your gvfsd was rebuilt with the right samba version: "Forcing NT1

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
It worked just fine on a disco desktop default install. I brought up a bionic vm, which has samba running and set to a workgroup called "workgroup" and has a /pub share. On disco, I click on "other locations", then "windows network", and I see "WORKGROUP". I can click on "WORKGROUP", which then

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-22 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I checked disco when I prepared these updates for bionic and cosmic, and it was allright. Let me re-check with a default install using the CD this time, now that it is released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Cosmic verification (continued) Now installing the updated samba packages, and rebuilding gvfs locally: samba: Installed: 2:4.8.4+dfsg-2ubuntu2.2 Candidate: 2:4.8.4+dfsg-2ubuntu2.2 Version table: *** 2:4.8.4+dfsg-2ubuntu2.2 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I think I mixed the verification-done tags, but both are done now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778322 Title: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree To

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Cosmic verification Confirming the bug: ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy samba gvfs-backends samba: Installed: 2:4.8.4+dfsg-2ubuntu2.1 Candidate: 2:4.8.4+dfsg-2ubuntu2.1 Version table: *** 2:4.8.4+dfsg-2ubuntu2.1 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-updates/main

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Bionic: full smbstatus output, showing the connection to the pub share as well: root@ubuntu:~# smbstatus Samba version 4.7.6-Ubuntu PID Username GroupMachine Protocol Version Encryption Signing

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Bionic verification (continued) Now installing the new samba packages. Since I need a gvfs rebuild with the new samba packages, I'm doing that locally. So in the end I now have: samba from proposed: *** 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.8 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-05 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Bionic verification Bug reproduced with the following packages: ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ apt-cache policy samba gvfs-backends samba: ... *** 2:4.7.6+dfsg~ubuntu-0ubuntu2.7 500 500 http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ...

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
For anyone wanting to test this bug, please note you will also have to wait for a gvfs rebuild with this new samba package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1778322

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-04-02 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: [Impact] The so called "browsing a windows network" made use of an SMB1 protocol version feature. Recent versions of samba, including the one released with bionic, default to a higher versions of the protocol which lacks this feature. As a result, the "other

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-03-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Description changed: - * Impact - On Bionic Beaver 18.04.1 gvfs-smb-browse can't browse smbtree because of that Nautilus displays "Empty Folder" when clicking "Windows Network" + [Impact] + The so called "browsing a windows network" made use of an SMB1 protocol version feature. Recent

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-03-28 Thread Andreas Hasenack
It worked with the updated patch. Packages rebuilt in the PPA. I'll prepare a merge proposal and SRU this into bionic. We will have to rebuild gvfs there, though, after samba lands in proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-03-28 Thread Andreas Hasenack
The original samba patch had a typo/error, this is the fix for that: https://github.com/samba- team/samba/commit/885435e8a4dc561749b880f8be7a32041fa954ec -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-03-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I just tried with my build from the ppa, but it's not working. When enabling debugging in gvfsd, I can see it setting the protocol to NT1: network: Added new job source 0x559ce1b3e070 (GVfsBackendNetwork) network: Queued new job 0x559ce1b4cab0 (GVfsJobMount) smb-network:

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-03-27 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Builds in a ppa look good: ... Native dependency smbclient found: YES 0.2.3 Checking for function "smbc_setOptionProtocols": YES ... Checking for real with a bionic desktop now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in

[Bug 1767454] Re: "Other Locations" does not automatically find Samba servers in Ubuntu 18.04

2019-03-26 Thread Andreas Hasenack
This will be addressed shortly via bug #1778322 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767454 Title: "Other Locations" does not automatically find Samba servers in Ubuntu

[Bug 1820282] Re: FTBFS: test failure during build in lp

2019-03-15 Thread Andreas Hasenack
** Also affects: zeromq via https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/1462 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to zeromq3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1820282

[Bug 1820282] [NEW] FTBFS: test failure during build in lp

2019-03-15 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: There is a test failure that only happens in the launchpad builder, but that fails the build. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zeromq3/4.3.1-3 >From https://launchpadlibrarian.net/415162342/buildlog_ubuntu-disco- amd64.zeromq3_4.3.1-3_BUILDING.txt.gz: FAIL:

[Bug 1767454] Re: "Other Locations" does not automatically find Samba servers in Ubuntu 18.04

2019-03-10 Thread Andreas Hasenack
What's described in comment #32 is being tracked in bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1778322 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767454 Title:

[Bug 1778322] Re: gvfs-smb-browse can't browse samba/smb tree

2019-03-10 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Looking at this next. ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 201786] Re: ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines

2018-11-29 Thread Andreas Hasenack
According to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/seahorse/+bug/1420522 it's fixed in seahorse 3.30, which is present in ubuntu cosmic and later. >From https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435924, this should >reproduce the problem: 1. Generate a ssh key using the keytype ed25519

[Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-18 Thread Andreas Hasenack
I've seen the wget debian change, but just switching builddeps from pcre3-dev to pcre2-dev and rebuilding isn't enough. The package ends up not finding pcre and doesn't enable it: checking for PCRE... no checking pcre.h usability... no checking pcre.h presence... no checking for pcre.h... no ...

[Bug 1771353] [NEW] Server feature level is now lower than when we began our transaction. Restarting with new ID

2018-05-15 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: systemd 237-3ubuntu10 from bionic There is no /etc/netplan/* file. I'm getting some sort of a loop when systemd-resolved tries to resolve the hostname of my canonistack instance: ubuntu@bip:~$ systemd-resolve bip.lcy02.canonistack bip.lcy02.canonistack: resolve call

Re: [Bug 1767454] Re: "Other Locations" does not automatically find Samba servers in Ubuntu 18.04

2018-05-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 5:54 PM, tony <1767...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Andreas, it looks like to me that smbtree still needs NT1 to list > shares, as people harden there servers and disable less secure protocols > it will break browsing for shares. > Do you mean list shares or list

[Bug 1767454] Re: "Other Locations" does not automatically find Samba servers in Ubuntu 18.04

2018-05-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Defaults for xenial (samba 4.3.11): client min protocol = CORE client max protocol = default (which is NT1 in this version of samba) Defaults for artful (samba 4.6.7): client min protocol = CORE client max protocol = default (which is NT1 in this version of samba) Defaults for bionic

[Bug 1767454] Re: "Other Locations" does not automatically find Samba servers in Ubuntu 18.04

2018-05-03 Thread Andreas Hasenack
What are your servers? I can't get windows 10 or 2016 server to show up not even in artful (17.10). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767454 Title: "Other

[Bug 1767454] Re: "Other Locations" does not automatically find Samba servers in Ubuntu 18.04

2018-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Do your servers show up under "Networks" in "other locations", just alongside the "Windows Network" folder? My NAS does show up there, but it could be because of some sort of zeroconf broadcast, not smb. My "windows network" is also empty, I'm just checking if newer windows installs would show up

[Bug 1767454] Re: "Other Locations" does not automatically find Samba servers in Ubuntu 18.04

2018-04-30 Thread Andreas Hasenack
After you install smbclient, can you please just run the "smbtree" command: Here it lists my NAS and its shares: $ smbtree LOWTECH \\NAS \\NAS\photo System default shared folder \\NAS\IPC$ IPC Service () (...)

[Bug 1765477] [NEW] 5s delay in AAAA dns resolving; artful and earlier is quick

2018-04-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: Basic steps: lxc launch ubuntu-daily:bionic bionic-daily lxc exec bionic-daily bash sleep 10s (because of #1765173) time host -d bionic-daily.lxd # or whatever domain your containers use by default In bionic, there is a 5s delay when requesting the record:

[Bug 1763108] [NEW] xenial2bionic release upgrade loses DNS: empty resolv.conf

2018-04-11 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Public bug reported: Note: I'm not sure which package better represents this bug, so I used systemd, because /etc/resolv.conf had no "nameserver 127.0.0.53" entry after the upgrade. I did a plain standard lxd deploy of xenial, using the default images. Upgraded it to the latest xenial

[Bug 1713098] Re: Frequent DEP8 test failures related to ftp

2018-03-21 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Using this patch: diff --git a/test/gvfs-test b/test/gvfs-test index 4537d8a5..c82e13a8 100755 --- a/test/gvfs-test +++ b/test/gvfs-test @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ class GvfsTestCase(unittest.TestCase): ml = GLib.MainLoop() -mount.unmount_with_operation(Gio.MountUnmountFlags.NONE,

[Bug 1747566] Re: Object ..., has been already finalized. Impossible to get any property from it. ... (stack trace in tweener.js)

2018-03-20 Thread Andreas Hasenack
andreas@nsnx:~$ grep tweener /var/log/syslog|wc -l 21664 andreas@nsnx:~$ grep tweener /var/log/syslog.1|wc -l 51874 andreas@nsnx:~$ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1713098] Re: Frequent DEP8 test failures related to ftp

2018-03-19 Thread Andreas Hasenack
We need a way to reproduce this locally, so that we can get a shell and investigate what is going on. So far I tried locally with amd64 and i386 vms, and the tests always pass. I guess I really need a ppc64el one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

  1   2   >