[Bug 784651] [NEW] memory hog under 11.04

2011-05-18 Thread Brendan Peterffy
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: nautilus

Nautilus, along with many standard applications, has been gobbling up
all 4Gb of my RAM ever since I've upgraded to Natty. I have a feeling
the extra effects enabled (which I can't seem to *disable*) such as
compiz are putting unnecessary burden on my resources. Everything is all
around slower, which is rather disappointing to be perfectly honest;
before the upgrade I could handle browsing the web *and* having a few
directories open, but now each program takes at least  1Gb of memory
each, and the constant swapping to and from disk makes X grind to a
halt.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: nautilus 1:2.32.2.1-0ubuntu13
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed May 18 11:00:04 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: nautilus
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-15 (2 days ago)

** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty regression

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784651

Title:
  memory hog under 11.04

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 784651] Re: memory hog under 11.04

2011-05-18 Thread Brendan Peterffy
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784651

Title:
  memory hog under 11.04

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 784651] Re: memory hog under 11.04

2011-05-18 Thread Brendan Peterffy
I'd also like to note this isn't by any means a underpowered rig; I
built it a few months ago with gaming and CPU intense tasks such as
compiling and multimedia work in mind. Surely a quad core Phenom  II
clocked at 3.2GHz is overkill for linux, right? I've got a Radeon HD
5670 for the graphics grunt-work, so it's not like the CPU is doing
double duty.

Is there a way to disable Compiz, or am I stuck with all of the graphics quirks 
and wasted memory? (Yes, I know it's pretty, but I'd rather put those resources 
to better use)
I mean, the only thing that has significantly changed since Maverick (which was 
having similar issues too.) is the mandatory compiz effects. On Maverick once 
compiz is disabled, everything runs fine and dandy.

I'll look into what has changed system load wise since the upgrade; I
have collectd running to make sure I catch any nasty problems before
they come back to bite me.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784651

Title:
  memory hog under 11.04

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 784651] Re: memory hog under 11.04

2011-05-18 Thread Brendan Peterffy
Sorry for the triple post, but here are a few graphs for an before and
after comparison of system utilization. The last week is shown, and I
upgraded late sunday, the two blank intervals of time being mandatory
reboots after the upgrade finished.

Notice how rapidly the memory and swap usage rises when the system is
being used; before upgrading, physical ram usage would raise and hold
around 3Gb, almost never needing to swap to disk and remaining snappy
and responsive. The next day, I hop on to check my email, read the new
entries on hackaday, and listen to some music. This is very light
compared to what I usually put that system through, yet it eats all of
the available ram and needs significant amounts of swap to run. The
sharp decline tuesday night shows me killing banshee, the gimp, firefox,
thunderbird, and eventually the X server over SSH out of frustration
because my dad's blu-ray player wasn't playing content on a samba share
due to the entire thing thrashing uncontrollably.


** Attachment added: Graphs of pre/post upgrade system resources
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/784651/+attachment/2133868/+files/graphs.tar

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/784651

Title:
  memory hog under 11.04

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 629258] Re: Battery life estimation never comes around

2011-04-29 Thread Brendan Peterffy
Bug is still alive and kicking. My HP g60 125nr does this and it drives
me nuts. If we can get a discharge rate (Wh/time) isn't it just simple
arithmetic to get at least a half-decent fallback routine should the
current implementation fail/time out? I've had the stock battery
replaced via BestBuy, and unsurprisingly it's a cheap Taiwanese knock-
off. I can check if the stock battery (as in genuine HP) can give an
estimate of remaining charge (it could be HP's hardware level vendor
locking, similar to ink cartridges), but I still see no reason for not
having a history based estimation as a failsafe.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug (38795).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258

Title:
  Battery life estimation never comes around

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 659334] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r()

2011-01-20 Thread Brendan Peterffy
Same problem here.
according to dpkg /lib/libnss_wins.so.6 is provided by the winbind package.
Before I installed winbind rhythmbox didn't segfault, so this might be a 
problem with libnss_wins.
Removing winbind does work as a workaround, but it's not fixing the problem.
If I find why this is happening I'll let you guys know, but uninstalling 
winbind might not be a option for people who need windows/linux network 
interoperability.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to rhythmbox in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659334

Title:
  rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r()

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs