[Bug 1941983] Re: gnome-shell crashes on display hotplug

2021-10-14 Thread Brian Rogers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1871262 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871262

Are you sure about duplicate status? This is a new issue I'm
experiencing with 21.10, and the reproduction steps are different (I see
nothing in the other bug about display hotplug).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941983

Title:
  gnome-shell crashes on display hotplug

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1941983/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1941983] Re: gnome-shell crashes on display hotplug

2021-08-31 Thread Brian Rogers
I had trouble getting apport to upload this initially and had manually
run apport-retrace on it by the time I got it to upload properly. I
manually deleted the coredump and set this to public since the apport
bot didn't do that on its own (it just removed the need-amd64-retrace
tag).

If there's an issue I can get another crash report.

** Attachment removed: "CoreDump.gz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1941983/+attachment/5521431/+files/CoreDump.gz

** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941983

Title:
  gnome-shell crashes on display hotplug

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1941983/+subscriptions


-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 694395] Re: [ubuntu] backlight adjustment hotkeys increment twice

2010-12-30 Thread Brian Rogers
If you run 'killall gnome-power-manager', do the brightness keys then
adjust by single increments?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694395

Title:
  [ubuntu] backlight adjustment hotkeys increment twice

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 629258] Re: Battery life estimation never comes around

2010-12-20 Thread Brian Rogers
Yeah, it's fairly inaccurate because upower samples the battery only
every 30 seconds, and many batteries only report charge level in
increments of a whole percent. So the estimator doesn't have precise
data for the charge level when it takes a reading, and when it sees a
change, all it knows is that that happened some time in the last 30
seconds.

With the version in my PPA, the estimates are projections from
alternating readings of the battery discharged 1% in 30 seconds and
the battery discharged 1% in 60 seconds or something similar to that.
I've done some experiments on my laptop with code that enforces a
minimum time interval and discharge amount before producing an estimate,
and it helps, but the estimates still fluctuate a bit.

I'd like to at least have a moving average estimate of the current (and
therefore time remaining) before submitting my patch. Or ideally, use
all that nice charge and discharge profile data that upower collects.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug (38795).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258

Title:
  Battery life estimation never comes around

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 629258] Re: Battery life estimation never comes around

2010-12-20 Thread Brian Rogers
Oh, and you probably did lose current_now because of 2.6.36. It comes
directly from the kernel, so not many other components have a chance to
make it go away. Battery hardware varies, so it's easy to have a battery
bug only affect specific laptops. I'd recommend testing a mainline
2.6.35 kernel (to see if it's an Ubuntu patch that provides
current_now), then bisecting to find the commit that made it go away.
If/when you do find a bad commit, you should file a new bug.

My own battery has never reported current_now. Some batteries just don't
report that data in a way that linux knows how to get it, and probably
some aren't even capable of reporting that data.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug (38795).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258

Title:
  Battery life estimation never comes around

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 629258] Re: Battery life estimation never comes around

2010-12-16 Thread Brian Rogers
The sysfs equivalent of 'present rate' is current_now. Do you have a
current_now file in /sys/class/power_supply/BAT0/ ? If so, does it
contain an actual reading, or just always report zero?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug (38795).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258

Title:
  Battery life estimation never comes around

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 629258] Re: Battery life estimation never comes around

2010-12-16 Thread Brian Rogers
For some people the battery is BAT0, and for others it's BAT1. I'm not
sure why. Be sure to check both paths for a current_now file, because
one of those paths won't even exist. As far as I know, current_now will
always be there if the battery directory is there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a subscriber of a duplicate bug (38795).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258

Title:
  Battery life estimation never comes around

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 629258] Re: Battery life estimation never comes around

2010-10-24 Thread Brian Rogers
I believe gnome-power-manager hasn't been able to provide a time
estimate since the rewrite for upower if your battery does not supply a
charge/discharge rate in /sys/class/power_supply/BAT*/current_now. My
battery always shows a 0 there, so I suffer from this problem.

Before upower, it used to make a projection based on measurements of the
charge level over time. That would take some work to re-implement.

The behavior of saying 'estimating' instead of supplying a percentage is
specific to the indicator applet code (the notification area icon
doesn't behave that way), and it's pretty easy to fix.

In fact, I just fixed it in this PPA: https://launchpad.net/~brian-
rogers/+archive/power

-- 
Battery life estimation never comes around
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 629258] Re: Battery life estimation never comes around

2010-10-22 Thread Brian Rogers
Balaji, if Ubuntu is getting wrong readings from your battery, you need
to open a new bug report for that. This bug report only covers the
problem where a battery life estimation isn't provided to the user on
systems where power consumption data isn't provided by the hardware. The
power manager needs to be programmed to produce its own estimate of the
rate of charge/discharge, through periodic sampling of the total charge
level, when the hardware doesn't report charge/discharge directly.

Also, there may be some laptops that can report this information, but
where the Linux kernel doesn't know how to retrieve it.

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

** Changed in: null
   Status: Confirmed = Invalid

-- 
Battery life estimation never comes around
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629258
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 630536] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_builder_add_value()

2010-09-18 Thread Brian Rogers
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_builder_add_value()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 630600] Re: palimpsest crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

2010-09-14 Thread Brian Rogers
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
palimpsest crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630600
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 630600] Re: palimpsest crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

2010-09-14 Thread Brian Rogers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 631760 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631760

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 631760
   palimpsest crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
 * You can subscribe to bug 631760 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/631760/+subscribe

-- 
palimpsest crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630600
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 630395] Re: brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_va()

2010-09-14 Thread Brian Rogers
** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Fix Released

-- 
brasero crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_va()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630395
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 433654] Re: Only one user gets sound with privilege Use audio devices

2010-09-13 Thread Brian Rogers
Access audio hardware directly might be a more accurate description,
but I don't have a strong preference.

-- 
Only one user gets sound with privilege Use audio devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433654
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-system-tools in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 611502] [NEW] Panel undersizes applets: dead space won't accept clicks, won't update

2010-07-29 Thread Brian Rogers
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-panel

Sometimes the panel doesn't set up a couple applets properly. The
affected applets take up the normal amount of space, but not all of that
space is functional. Some space at the right end of the applets doesn't
update and won't accept left-clicks. If I right-click that area, it acts
as if I clicked the panel instead of the applet.

Right now I'm seeing this problem with the clock and Indicator Applet
Session. The timing appears to be important as I usually see the issue
when I do 'sudo restart gdm'. A normal boot usually doesn't exhibit the
issue. Killing the panel and letting it restart fixes the problem.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: gnome-panel 1:2.30.2-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35rc6-latest4.156gfc0f5ac-generic 2.6.35rc6-rc6
Uname: Linux 2.6.35rc6-latest4-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Jul 29 15:20:21 2010
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-panel
GConfNonDefault:
 
/apps/panel/general/applet_id_list=[clock_screen0,notification_area_screen0,indicator_applet_screen0,show_desktop_button_screen0,window_list_screen0,workspace_switcher_screen0,trashapplet_screen0,fast_user_switch_screen0]
 
/apps/panel/general/object_id_list=[object_0,object_2,menu_bar_screen0,browser_launcher_screen0,object_5,object_6]
 /apps/panel/general/toplevel_id_list=[bottom_panel_screen0,top_panel_screen0]
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20100224.1)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-panel
XsessionErrors: (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2764): GLib-CRITICAL **: 
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed

** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
Panel undersizes applets: dead space won't accept clicks, won't update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611502
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 611502] Re: Panel undersizes applets: dead space won't accept clicks, won't update

2010-07-29 Thread Brian Rogers

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52710117/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52710118/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52710119/ProcStatus.txt

-- 
Panel undersizes applets: dead space won't accept clicks, won't update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611502
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 611502] Re: Panel undersizes applets: dead space won't accept clicks, won't update

2010-07-29 Thread Brian Rogers
Notice a junk '9,' in the non-updating area, probably from the applet
shifting while the panel was starting. The time is missing from the
clock, and the rightmost menu with restart, shutdown, etc, is missing
from the indicator applet.

** Attachment added: Screenshot of the problem
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52711082/problem.png

-- 
Panel undersizes applets: dead space won't accept clicks, won't update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611502
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 611502] Re: Panel undersizes applets: dead space won't accept clicks, won't update

2010-07-29 Thread Brian Rogers
This shows clearly which region is clickable and updates, and which
region isn't. Or more accurately, clicking in the 'dead area' just
counts as clicking in the panel.

** Attachment added: Screenshot of the problem, calendar open
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52711498/problem-calendar.png

-- 
Panel undersizes applets: dead space won't accept clicks, won't update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611502
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 410407] Re: Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION]

2010-06-06 Thread Brian Rogers
Doesn't this only happen on 64-bit Firefox with the 32-bit plugin using
nsplugwrapper? I suspect that's a scenario they don't test.

-- 
Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to epiphany-browser in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 61237] Re: Drag 'n Drop in list view doesn't work

2010-05-03 Thread Brian Rogers
The 'invalid' status is misleading. The upstream bug being tracked was
marked as a dup. I'm updating it to track the new bug.

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #310819
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310819

** Changed in: nautilus
   Status: Invalid = Unknown

** Changed in: nautilus
 Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #101938 = GNOME Bug Tracker #310819

-- 
Drag 'n Drop in list view doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61237
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 542483] [NEW] Most of the gnome session never starts

2010-03-20 Thread Brian Rogers
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-session

After updating Lucid today, upon restart I only got the desktop image
and the mouse cursor.

The gnome panel and desktop items never appear. My browser and e-mail
keys launch Firefox and Thunderbird just fine. I can adjust the volume
with the volume keys and I get the on-screen indicator, and compiz is
working. But no visible gnome interface starts.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Mar 20 00:26:25 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gnome-session
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha amd64 (20100224.1)
Package: gnome-session-bin 2.29.92-0ubuntu1
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-preempt
SourcePackage: gnome-session
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-preempt x86_64
XsessionErrors:
 (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1281): GLib-CRITICAL **: 
g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed
 (bluetooth-applet:1294): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_action_set_sensitive: assertion 
`GTK_IS_ACTION (action)' failed
 (gnome-settings-daemon:1273): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: 
gdk_pixbuf_format_get_name: assertion `format != NULL' failed
 (gnome-settings-daemon:1273): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: 
gdk_pixbuf_format_get_name: assertion `format != NULL' failed

** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
Most of the gnome session never starts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542483
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 542483] Re: Most of the gnome session never starts

2010-03-20 Thread Brian Rogers

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41379525/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41379526/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41379527/ProcStatus.txt

-- 
Most of the gnome session never starts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542483
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 542483] Re: Most of the gnome session never starts

2010-03-20 Thread Brian Rogers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 542503 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542503

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 542503
   X-Ubuntu-Gettext-Domain line above [Desktop Entry] invalidates .desktop files

-- 
Most of the gnome session never starts
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542483
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-session in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 395299] Re: gdm 2.26 has no graphical configuration tool

2009-11-03 Thread Brian Rogers
This is something Gnome did, not Ubuntu devs. And I'm not really sure
how feasible it would be to preserve an older version of gdm. It'd be an
extra package to support, for one. If it needed an older version of the
Gnome libraries, things would quickly get problematic.

-- 
gdm 2.26 has no graphical configuration tool
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395299
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 456451] Re: Evince presents blank window and uses 100% CPU; crashes on close

2009-10-20 Thread Brian Rogers
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
Evince presents blank window and uses 100% CPU; crashes on close
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456451
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 446748] Re: evince assert failure: EvinceDocument:ERROR:ev-file-helpers.c:67:ev_tmp_dir: assertion failed: (exists)

2009-10-20 Thread Brian Rogers
My tmp was a symlink to /dev/shm. That appears to be what it doesn't
like. If /tmp is a normal directory, or a tmpfs is mounted directly on
/tmp, it's fine.

-- 
evince assert failure: EvinceDocument:ERROR:ev-file-helpers.c:67:ev_tmp_dir: 
assertion failed: (exists)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/446748
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 397839] Re: Screen randomly goes off in karmic

2009-09-27 Thread Brian Rogers
I can confirm that patch gets screen blanking working. I tested in my
PPA: https://launchpad.net/~brian-rogers/+archive/ppa

-- 
Screen randomly goes off in karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397839
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 397734] Re: can't eject unmounted cdrom with hardware button

2009-08-30 Thread Brian Rogers
I believe devicekit-disks is responsible for this, like with bug 417964.
Updating affected package.

** Package changed: nautilus (Ubuntu) = devicekit-disks (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: devicekit-disks (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
can't eject unmounted cdrom with hardware button
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397734
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 140602] Re: Add two-finger scrolling/two-finger tapping to Touchpad options

2009-08-10 Thread Brian Rogers
Some options are there now in System - Preferences - Mouse, in the
Touchpad tab.

There's the option to disable the touchpad while typing, and to enable
tap-clicks. For scrolling, we have disabled, edge scrolling, and two-
finger scrolling, plus a checkbox for horizontal scrolling. If tap-
clicking is on, then two-finger taps perform right clicks and three-
finger taps perform middle clicks.

Though there's currently no way to change what two and three finger taps
do, nor are there corner tap or circular scrolling settings, and there's
no touchpad-specific sensitivity setting either.

-- 
Add two-finger scrolling/two-finger tapping to Touchpad options
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 35316] Re: these windows do not support save current setup message questionable

2009-07-11 Thread Brian Rogers
The state of this bug is already in the 'confirmed' state. It does not
need any more confirmations.

-- 
these windows do not support save current setup message questionable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35316
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 282325] Re: nautilus-sendto doesn't support Obex Push file transfer since intrepid

2009-02-10 Thread Brian Rogers
But the code, as it exists right now, is just plain silly. All devices
are shown in the drop-down list, regardless of whether they can receive
OBEX transfers. It's only after choosing one and clicking send that the
program checks, and at that point it might as well just try sending the
file.

In a future version, SDP should be used to filter the drop-down list to
have only appropriate devices. For Intrepid, we can just skip the check
that occurs immediately before sending the file.

-- 
nautilus-sendto doesn't support Obex Push file transfer since intrepid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282325
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for nautilus-sendto.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 322310] Re: Ekiga running, hidden, unreachable and won't close

2009-01-31 Thread Brian Rogers
This is a libX11 bug. I've posted a fix upstream at
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-January/043133.html

-- 
Ekiga running, hidden, unreachable and won't close
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322310
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for ekiga.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 322310] Re: Ekiga running, hidden, unreachable and won't close

2009-01-30 Thread Brian Rogers
Here's a backtrace with more symbols.

From frames 7 and 8, it looks like it's trying to create a tray icon
when it freezes. Then it goes into some xcb code. The problem could be
with a recent xcb update...

** Attachment added: backtrace.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/21845340/backtrace.txt

-- 
Ekiga running, hidden, unreachable and won't close
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322310
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for ekiga.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 282325] Re: nautilus-sendto doesn't support Obex Push file transfer anymore

2008-10-21 Thread Brian Rogers
Yeah, making validate_destination always return true gets nautilus-
sendto working. Currently it returns false because the UUIDs array for
my device doesn't contain any entries.

Another issue is that nautilus-sendto will scan for and list Bluetooth
devices you're not paired with, but the check in its current form can
only work on paired devices. If I pick a device I'm not paired with I
get Programming error, could not find the device in the list. But with
the change to validate_destination, it works properly.

With this change, if I try to send a file to a device that can't receive
files, I get a progress window which produces the error
org.openobex.Error.ConnectionAttemptFailed, which I the same thing
that happens if I do that from the Bluetooth applets send files to
device option.

-- 
nautilus-sendto doesn't support Obex Push file transfer anymore
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282325
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus-sendto in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 269083] Re: gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()

2008-09-18 Thread Brian Rogers
Happens to me as well, around 10%. My battery indicator turns red around
the same time, so I believe this problem is triggered by the battery's
'critical' status.

-- 
gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in g_closure_invoke()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269083
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 62962] Re: Gimp crashes while doing nothing...

2006-12-16 Thread Brian Rogers
I'm also having this problem. Gimp crashes whenever a file is modified
that isn't currently open in Gimp, but is in the same directory as an
image opened for editing in Gimp. In my case, it's an html file I'm
working on.

-- 
Gimp crashes while doing nothing...
https://launchpad.net/bugs/62962

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 73587] Re: Crashed while opening a radio URL.

2006-11-30 Thread Brian Rogers
Crashes while trying to open KERA, another public radio station.

http://pubint.ic.llnwd.net/stream/pubint_kera

Sometimes it works but sometimes it crashes.

Attaching /var/crash/_usr_bin_rhythmbox.1000.crash

/* Brian Rogers, professional geek, coffee achiever */

** Attachment added: _usr_bin_rhythmbox.1000.crash
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/5218053/_usr_bin_rhythmbox.1000.crash

-- 
Crashed while opening a radio URL.
https://launchpad.net/bugs/73587

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 62983] Re: With multiple monitors, screen can be locked, but unlock dialog won't appear

2006-10-02 Thread Brian Rogers
After a little research, it appears that gnome-screensaver is
responsible for locking, so I am moving this bug.

I can trigger the locking by running
gnome-screensaver-command --lock

Also, I notice that I can still interact with my desktop even though the
screen is black.  It's as if gnome-screensaver crashes, leaving the
brightness at zero.

** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: gnome-session = gnome-screensaver

-- 
With multiple monitors, screen can be locked, but unlock dialog won't appear
https://launchpad.net/bugs/62983

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 62983] With multiple monitors, screen can be locked, but unlock dialog won't appear

2006-09-29 Thread Brian Rogers
Public bug reported:

I have a dual-head nVidia card, configured to use my LCD monitor as
screen 0 and my TV as screen 1 (to the left of the monitor). I can lock
the screen, but it only fades to black. Even when a screen saver is set,
it never starts. Instead, the cursor momentarily disappears, then it
reappears.

After this, moving the mouse around does nothing but move the cursor,
and both screens remain completely black except for the cursor. The
interface to unlock the screen never appears and typing my password
blindly does not work. My only option is to kill the entire session and
log in again.

I have verified, using both the nvidia driver and the nv driver, that a
single-screen configuration does not exhibit this problem. It starts the
screen saver properly when the screen is locked, and allows me to type
my password and unlock it.

This bug is very bad when the screensaver starts automatically after a
period inactivity and locks the screen.

** Affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
With multiple monitors, screen can be locked, but unlock dialog won't appear
https://launchpad.net/bugs/62983

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs