[Bug 1299749] [NEW] E4defrag fails to restore parent directory timestamp after defragmenting a file in that directory
Public bug reported: The effect of this bug is quite similar to the one the was reported via bug 1133663 ”Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders”. Directions to reproduce follow: 1. Create a tar.bz2 archive of a directory containing a fragmented file. One such file might be the 64-bit debian download of google-chrome-stable. 2. Extract that archive to a temporary location that is not on the same partition. 3. Consume some time, a few minutes will do. 4. E4defrag the partition. 5. Observe that the directory timestamp indicates the time that the file was defragmented. The original timestamp was not restored. The --delay-directory-restore flag got the job done for Extract Here. Might there be something similar for e4defrag? ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299749 Title: E4defrag fails to restore parent directory timestamp after defragmenting a file in that directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1299749/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1299935] [NEW] Login screen fails to adhere to (System Settings) Brightness Lock configuration
Public bug reported: The Login screen will be displayed and the screen will never go blank under any of the following conditions: 1. Following a cold (power on) boot. 2. Following a warm (restart) boot. 3. Following detection of mouse movement or keyboard input when the screen was locked. This problem can be reproduced 100% of the time using an installation the 64-bit iso (2014-03_11 07:51) updated to 3.13.0-20-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 28 09:56:33 UTC 2014. The first two conditions are not new but the third appears to have been introduced when the unlock dialogue was replaced with the Login screen. ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299935 Title: Login screen fails to adhere to (System Settings) Brightness Lock configuration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1299935/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1200898] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_free1()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1196063 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196063 ??? Could not find related bug 1196063. Was the bug number mistyped? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200898 Title: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in g_slice_free1() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1200898/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
Another data point. In addition to failing via the right click extract here menu, the CLI file-roller -h command produces the same failure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
Please re-open this bug. I tested using a recent 13.10 and file-roller 3.9.90 and observed that extract here fails to delay directory restore causing EVERY non-empty extracted folder to assume the date/time of extraction. I will attempt to attach a screenshot of the relevant portion of the GNOME file-roller 3.8.4 change log and a screenshot of a terminal window indicating stats on the OS in use, an ls -al of the iso used to install the OS and the current file-roller version. ** Attachment added: file-roller 3.9.90.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+attachment/3801753/+files/file-roller%203.9.90.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
** Attachment added: file-roller 3.9.90.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+attachment/3801754/+files/file-roller%203.9.90.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
** Attachment added: file-roller 3.8.4 changes.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+attachment/3801755/+files/file-roller%203.8.4%20changes.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
This BUG still exists in file-roller 3.8.3 (13.10 dev) The bug report submitted to GNOME several months ago indicates NO activity which would lead one to believe that it is being ignored. Might there be a Ubuntu-centric workaround? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1110025] Re: gksu nautllus Can't change preferences MISSING file menu
Jeremy, Thanks for the update. I have been using gksu nautilus to change ownership of each newly formatted ext4 partition and/or root-owned files that I need to rename, modify or delete from time to time. One such use is with fstab. I prefer to rename it and modify a copy. When happy with the modification, I delete the renamed version. Doing so via the CLI can be tedious and error-prone. Is there another way to accomplish changes of ownership and/or content of root-owned files via a GUI now that gksu nautilus is no longer supported? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110025 Title: gksu nautllus Can't change preferences MISSING file menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1110025/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
This BUG manifests in 12.10, 13.04 and 13.10 but NOT in 12.04 Apparently this functionality is either considered perfect and/or not important enough to warrant QA regression testing. When a non-empty directory gets extracted, its datetime stamp is immediately restored but recursive extraction of its content (files, folders, etc) will update that directory's datetime stamp with the time of extraction. In 12.04, the datetime stamp restoration was delayed until after all content had been extracted. Until it gets fixed upstream (2013 perhaps), the following CLI command will allow proper extraction of a tar.bz2 archive: tar --delay -xvf tar-archive-name tar -xvf tar-archive-name MAY yield unpredictable results My eyes have trouble seeing the double hypen in --dash as I type this, so I will refer to them as hyphen hyphen. hypen hypen delay is an acceptable abbreviation of the option hypen hyphen delay-directory-restore -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
Sebastian, Bug 697756 was filed a couple of weeks ago but has not been acknowledged. Perhaps 100% reproducible bugs offer little technical challenge and are therefore ignored. ** Attachment added: Bug 697756 - file-roller 3.6.x delay-directory-restore failing during non-empty folder extraction.png https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+attachment/3657032/+files/Bug%20697756%20-%20file-roller%203.6.x%20delay-directory-restore%20failing%20during%20non-empty%20folder%20extraction.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1166971] Re: file-roller 3.6.x delay-directory-restore failing during non-empty folder extraction
Link to upstream bug report follows: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697756 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #697756 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697756 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166971 Title: file-roller 3.6.x delay-directory-restore failing during non-empty folder extraction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1166971/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1166971] [NEW] file-roller 3.6.x delay-directory-restore failing during non-empty folder extraction
Public bug reported: file-roller 3.6.x delay-directory-restore failing during non-empty folder extraction 64-bit File-Roller 3.6.0 via 1210 3.5.0-17-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 9 19:31:23 UTC 2012 fails 64-bit File-Roller 3.6.3 via 1304 3.8.0-16-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 1 19:52:57 UTC 2013 fails 64-bit File-Roller 3.4.1 via 1204 3.5.0-26-generic #42~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 11 22:17:58 UTC 2013 functions correctly 1. Extract a tar.bz2 archive containing non-empty folders. 2. Date-time stamps will be restored BEFORE folder content. 3. Date-time stamp restoration should be delayed until after folder content is restored. This failure causes the date-time stamp of each non-empty folder to be overwritten with the date and time that folder content was restored. This failure can be reproduced 100% of the time using either the right- click menu extract option or the file-roller from the cli. Apparently file-roller is NOT included in regression testing. ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166971 Title: file-roller 3.6.x delay-directory-restore failing during non-empty folder extraction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1166971/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1166996] [NEW] Unity locks EVERY partition to the launcher at startup - UGLY useless CLUTTER
Public bug reported: Unity locks EVERY partition to the launcher at startup - UGLY useless CLUTTER 64-bit unity via 1210 3.5.0-17-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 9 19:31:23 UTC 2012 fails 64-bit unity via 1304 3.8.0-16-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 1 19:52:57 UTC 2013 fails 64-bit unity via 1204 3.5.0-26-generic #42~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 11 22:17:58 UTC 2013 functions correctly This change may have occurred to assist a user who is too naive or lazy to mount a partition. Please provide an option to disable this UGLY useless CLUTTER ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1166996 Title: Unity locks EVERY partition to the launcher at startup - UGLY useless CLUTTER To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1166996/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1167002] [NEW] Gparted locks EVERY partition to the launcher when launched - UGLY useless CLUTTER
Public bug reported: Gparted locks EVERY partition to the launcher when launched - UGLY useless CLUTTER 64-bit gparted via 1210 3.5.0-17-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 9 19:31:23 UTC 2012 fails 64-bit gparted via 1304 3.8.0-16-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Mon Apr 1 19:52:57 UTC 2013 fails 64-bit gparted via 1204 3.5.0-26-generic #42~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 11 22:17:58 UTC 2013 functions correctly This change may have occurred to assist a user who is too naive or lazy to mount a partition. Please provide an option to disable this UGLY useless CLUTTER ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1167002 Title: Gparted locks EVERY partition to the launcher when launched - UGLY useless CLUTTER To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1167002/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1163146] [NEW] unable to locate libudev0
Public bug reported: 64-bit D07-1304 3.8.0-15-generic #25-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 27 19:19:30 UTC 2013 1. Attempted to install Chrome Stable but got a dependency error message concerning libudev0 2. Attempted to install libudev0 via apt-get isntall libudev0 and got a message indicating that it could not be located. ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163146 Title: unable to locate libudev0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1163146/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1163151] [NEW] 13.04 Update HANGs
Public bug reported: D07-1304 3.8.0-15-generic #25-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 27 19:19:30 UTC 2013 1. Atempt to install upgrades. 2. Hang trying to install 3.8.0-16 following an install of the 2013-04_01 daily build. Had the same symptoms trying to upgrade from 3.8.0-14 to 3.8.0-15 IN both cases, the error gathering process reports this as known bug but points to a bug that does not seem at all related. This last process happens IF Chrome has been installed and is the default browser. If FireFox is the default it just hangs. FireFox on Ubuntu functions so poorly that it must have come from Redmond! ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163151 Title: 13.04 Update HANGs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1163151/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 1152338] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV Following Ctrl-F
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1044002 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044002 b On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Apport retracing service 1152...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1044002 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044002 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1044002, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562813/+files/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment removed: Disassembly.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562815/+files/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment removed: ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562817/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562818/+files/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment removed: Registers.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562819/+files/Registers.txt ** Attachment removed: Stacktrace.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562821/+files/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment removed: ThreadStacktrace.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562822/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 1044002 ** Tags removed: need-amd64-retrace -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV Following Ctrl-F Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: 64-bit D07-1304 3.8.0-11-generic #20-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 5 20:32:48 UTC 2013 Open a PDF. Prepare to search for text by pressing Control F CRASH! ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: evince 3.6.1-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-11.20-generic 3.8.2 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Thu Mar 7 13:31:53 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evince InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-26 (9 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Alpha amd64 (20130225) MarkForUpload: True ProcCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-11-generic root=UUID=ee725bf1-d26e-498a-8cdb-1c14e1ec571f ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x7fa4c6d873e8:cmpq $0x0,0x30(%r12) PC (0x7fa4c6d873e8) ok source $0x0 ok destination 0x30(%r12) (0x0030) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment) SegvReason: writing NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: evince StacktraceTop: ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1152338/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV Following Ctrl-F To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1152338/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 1152338] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV Following Ctrl-F
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1044002 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044002 On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Ernest Boyd ernestb...@gmail.com wrote Bug 1044002 appears to be a private bug and is therefore NOT accessible. On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Apport retracing service 1152...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote: *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1044002 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044002 Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1044002, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find. ** Attachment removed: CoreDump.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562813/+files/CoreDump.gz ** Attachment removed: Disassembly.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562815/+files/Disassembly.txt ** Attachment removed: ProcMaps.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562817/+files/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment removed: ProcStatus.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562818/+files/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment removed: Registers.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562819/+files/Registers.txt ** Attachment removed: Stacktrace.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562821/+files/Stacktrace.txt ** Attachment removed: ThreadStacktrace.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338/+attachment/3562822/+files/ThreadStacktrace.txt ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of private bug 1044002 ** Tags removed: need-amd64-retrace -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV Following Ctrl-F Status in “evince” package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: 64-bit D07-1304 3.8.0-11-generic #20-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 5 20:32:48 UTC 2013 Open a PDF. Prepare to search for text by pressing Control F CRASH! ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: evince 3.6.1-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-11.20-generic 3.8.2 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Thu Mar 7 13:31:53 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evince InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-26 (9 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Alpha amd64 (20130225) MarkForUpload: True ProcCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-11-generic root=UUID=ee725bf1-d26e-498a-8cdb-1c14e1ec571f ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x7fa4c6d873e8:cmpq $0x0,0x30(%r12) PC (0x7fa4c6d873e8) ok source $0x0 ok destination 0x30(%r12) (0x0030) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment) SegvReason: writing NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: evince StacktraceTop: ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1152338/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV Following Ctrl-F To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1152338/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1062733] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of private bug 1044002 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1062733 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1062733/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1152338] [NEW] evince crashed with SIGSEGV Following Ctrl-F
Public bug reported: 64-bit D07-1304 3.8.0-11-generic #20-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 5 20:32:48 UTC 2013 Open a PDF. Prepare to search for text by pressing Control F CRASH! ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: evince 3.6.1-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-11.20-generic 3.8.2 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.9.1-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Thu Mar 7 13:31:53 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evince InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-26 (9 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Alpha amd64 (20130225) MarkForUpload: True ProcCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-11-generic root=UUID=ee725bf1-d26e-498a-8cdb-1c14e1ec571f ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SegvAnalysis: Segfault happened at: 0x7fa4c6d873e8: cmpq $0x0,0x30(%r12) PC (0x7fa4c6d873e8) ok source $0x0 ok destination 0x30(%r12) (0x0030) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment) SegvReason: writing NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: evince StacktraceTop: ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libcairo.so.2 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apparmor apport-crash need-amd64-retrace raring ** Information type changed from Private to Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV Following Ctrl-F To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1152338/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1152338] Re: evince crashed with SIGSEGV Following Ctrl-F
Apparently, the PDF that I used causes the failure in 13.04 but not 12.04 I will attach the PDF associated with the failure. ** Attachment added: PDF Associated with Evince crash https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1152338/+attachment/3563096/+files/Alcatel%20OT%20838%20User%20Manual.pdf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1152338 Title: evince crashed with SIGSEGV Following Ctrl-F To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1152338/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1133663] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
Great Idea Sebastian This bug is 100% reproducible. However, my attempt at filing a report via Bugzilla was more difficult than being confronted by the US tax code for the first time. Perhaps someone with knowledge if the secret ritual would be so kind as to report this. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This functionally WORKED in 12.04, got DESTROYED in 12.10 and has not been fixed in either 64-bit 3.5.0-25-generic #39~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 26 00:07:14 UTC 2013 or 64-bit 3.8.0-7-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP Thu Feb 21 20:07:18 UTC 2013 Since I make use of this functionally frequently each day, I have avoided 12.10 except to determine if certain bugs have been fixed. I would appreciate it if this ROADBLOCK to using 13.04 is removed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1133663] [NEW] Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders
Public bug reported: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders. This functionally WORKED in 12.04, got DESTROYED in 12.10 and has not been fixed in either 64-bit 3.5.0-25-generic #39~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Tue Feb 26 00:07:14 UTC 2013 or 64-bit 3.8.0-7-generic #15-Ubuntu SMP Thu Feb 21 20:07:18 UTC 2013 Since I make use of this functionally frequently each day, I have avoided 12.10 except to determine if certain bugs have been fixed. I would appreciate having this ROADBLOCK to using 13.04 removed. ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133663 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps for non-empty folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1133663/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1110025] Re: gksu nautllus Can't change preferences MISSING file menu
This bug also occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-6-generic. Tested Friday 2013-02_16 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110025 Title: gksu nautllus Can't change preferences MISSING file menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1110025/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This bug also occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-6-generic. Tested Friday 2013-02_16 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1110025] Re: gksu nautllus Can't change preferences MISSING file menu
This bug also occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-3-generic. Tested Friday 2013-02_01 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110025 Title: gksu nautllus Can't change preferences MISSING file menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1110025/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This bug also occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-3-generic. Tested Friday 2013-02_01 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This functionally WORKED in 12.04 but got DESTROYED in 12.10 and has not been fixed in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-3-generic. Since I make use of this functionally frequently each day, I have avoided 12.10 except to determine if certain bugs have been fixed. I would appreciate it if this ROADBLOCK to using 13.04 is removed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1110025] [NEW] gksu nautllus Can't change preferences MISSING file menu
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 64-bit 13.04 3.8.0-2 generic Alt-F2 to launch gksu nautilus with ROOT privilege. Unable to change preferences due to MISSING file menu. File menu does provide the preferences option when nautilus is launched with USER privilege. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1110025 Title: gksu nautllus Can't change preferences MISSING file menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1110025/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-2-generic. Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_27 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1304 (Raring) with kernel 3.8.0-0-generic. Downloaded and tested today 2013-01_14 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
In my daily work archives are created to preserve snapshots of work in progress. In addition, they are extracted and the before/after folder structures are compared via Beyond Compare. IF Nvidia drivers would stop randomly hanging and thus forcing power resets, I might be able to reduce archiving activities significantly. 1. Should I advise my less-technical associates to SHUN Nvidia hardware because Nvidia continues to demonstrate that driver quality is not important? 2. Should I advise my less-technical associates to SHUN Ubuntu One and ALL versions of Ubuntu after 12.04 including any MOBILE offerings because bugs like this one do not get fixed? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This bug STILL occurs in 64 bit 1210 (Quantal) with kernel 3.5.0-21-generic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
Will this BUG be fixed before 13.04 or should I AVOID 12.10 and continue to use 12.04? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
This bug STILL occurs in 1210 v19 This bug appears to be similar to bug 1076731 which does NOT appear in 1210 v19 but does occur in earlier versions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1087494] [NEW] System HANGS until power is cycled causing a subsequent fsck to throw errors
Public bug reported: MOST of the time the problem has been Nvidia driver related. The following options should be ENABLED by default: 1. Mouse and Touchpad - Show position of pointer when the Control key is pressed. 2. Keyboard Layout Options - Key sequence to kill the X server - Control + Alt + Backspace WHEN, not if, the system hangs due to Nvidia driver problems, the following sequence will usually allow a user to restart X-windows and continue without the need for a power cycle: 1. Control + Alt + Backspace 2. Tap the Control key to highlight the location of the pointer 3. Repeat steps one a two a few times until X-windows restarts. IDEAL but very FUTURISTIC solution. Modify Nvidia drivers so that they work correctly. ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087494 Title: System HANGS until power is cycled causing a subsequent fsck to throw errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1087494/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
When an archive is decompressed, original folder/file date-time stamps should be preserved. Current behavior sets them to the date-time of extraction. Perhaps this bug being ignored because it only effects serious users; coupled with a strong perception that Ubuntu is only being used to facilitate entertainment (facebook, streaming video, etc.) of non- serious users. I would like to move from an older version of Ubuntu, where archiving works correctly, and take advantage of some of the improvements within Ubuntu 12.10 but I cannot move to a newer version whether 12.10 or 13.04, if archiving remains horribly broken. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076731] Re: Tar -xpf fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
tar -xpf functions correctly with 64-bit 12.04 but not with 64-bit 12.10 (Different partitions but same hardware) Have changes to the kernel broken it or are Unity changes the cause? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076731 Title: Tar -xpf fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076731/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] Re: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
Extract Here functions correctly with 64-bit 12.04 but not with 64-bit 12.10 (Different partitions but same hardware) Have changes to the kernel broken it or are Unity changes the cause? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076716] [NEW] Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
Public bug reported: Use Right-Click Extract Here command to untar a tar.bz2 archive. Non-empty folders will lose original timestamps and show date/time of extraction. Empty folders and files are processed correctly and retain original timestamps. ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076716 Title: Extract Here fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076716/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1076731] [NEW] Tar -xpf fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders)
Public bug reported: Use tar -xpf untar a tar.bz2 archive. Non-empty folders will lose original timestamps and show date/time of extraction. The exception will be the top folder which will have its original timestamp retained. Empty folders and files are processed correctly and retain original timestamps. ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1076731 Title: Tar -xpf fails to preserve timestamps (non-empty folders) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1076731/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 562748] Re: Suspend rather than Hibernate is the Default
Depressing the power button (only tried while logged in) or selecting shutdown from the menu will produce a dialog which will default to shutdown after a minute. Although this power down option works correctly, 5 to 7 seven seconds seems like a long time while awaiting a forced shutdown and a minute seems like forever. Can the default time until shutdown be reduced? Hibernation appears to happen following a hibernation menu request (did not try an automatic one). Recovery from hibernation fails miserably with a splotched black and white pattern. Recovery from this disaster requires not one but two powerdowns and restarts. The first restart produces a yucky theme. Is it possible that an Nvidia driver is required to be able to sucessfully hibernate/restore since I am using a pCie Nvidia graphics card? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562748 Title: Suspend rather than Hibernate is the Default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/562748/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 548952] Re: gnome-nettool crashed with SIGSEGV in on_ping_graph_expose()
My hardware is Intel-based (e8500). Traceroute works OK. -- gnome-nettool crashed with SIGSEGV in on_ping_graph_expose() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/548952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-nettool in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 355996] Re: Power Management FAILS most of the time
This is still and issue with 9.10 and 10.04 b2 (lucid- desktop-i386_2010-04-12_0812). The screensaver should care about USER inactivity while powersave should also be concerned with system activity. A diff of two hard drives that contain more than 200 GBs each will take quite some time. Powersave should not kick in during this process but the screensaver should work as configured by the user. This will require two separate notions of inactivity, one for the screensaver only and one for both powersave and the screensaver. Shutdown, NOT suspend should be the default action when the power button is pushed. There are many cases when a hung system can only be addressed by removing power or forcing a shutdown. Shutting a hung system via the power button will do less harm that simpply removing power. Finally, hibernate and NOT suspend should be the powersave default because data will be lost during suspend if power is lost. -- Power Management FAILS most of the time https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 502884] [NEW] Ubuntu-910 VLC Inhibits Power Management 2009-01-04
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp 1.VLC Inhibits Power Management even when the CHECKBOX, Inhibit the power management daemon during playback, is unchecked. 2.A reboot is required to get power management to again function properly. VLC 1.0.2-1ubuntu2.1 ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Jan 4 02:06:09 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-17.54-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-17-generic-pae i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1902): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1902): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (nautilus:1997): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2013): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (gnome-panel:1996): Gtk-WARNING **: gtk_widget_size_allocate(): attempt to allocate widget with width -5 and height 24 ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Ubuntu-910 VLC Inhibits Power Management 2009-01-04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 502884] Re: Ubuntu-910 VLC Inhibits Power Management 2009-01-04
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402981/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402982/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37402983/ProcStatus.txt -- Ubuntu-910 VLC Inhibits Power Management 2009-01-04 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502884 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 482835] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14
Nvidia 9500gt card will NOT function properly with generic Ubuntu drivers. Having been spoiled because Ubuntu has done such a great job with hardware interaction, I failed to notice that this problem was associated with use of generic drivers. Executed a clean reinstall of 9.10 Upgraded to Kernel 2.6.31-15 (default upgrade) 2009-11-15 Installed recommended Nvidia driver (185) Executed gconf-editor via Alt+F2 Changed apps gnome-power-manager actions sleep_type_ac from suspend to hibernate Screensaver, suspend and hibernate each function correctly on my desktop computer. Please close this issue – User Error. -- Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 482835] [NEW] Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Triple boot desktop system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive. Ubuntu 9.10 was installed via LiveCD with BIOS set to AHCI. Hibernate 9.10 via menu option then wait for power-down. Push power button. During power-up, observe message concerning waking up. A short while later, this screen will be redisplayed and then the computer will freeze requiring a power-cycle to get it going. It appears that after this power-cycle, a cold rather than a return-from-hibernation restart was executed and the condition of the system prior to hibernation was not restored. Suspend and Hibernation will each function correctly when executed from the menu in 9.04, which was installed with BIOS set to Enhanced IDE although the BIOS was set to AHCI when I last tested those functions and observed correct operation. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Nov 14 14:21:07 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic-pae i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1810): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1810): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1910): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (nautilus:1869): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (yelp:2302): Yelp-WARNING **: Failed to load config file: No such file or directory ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 482835] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699380/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699381/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35699382/ProcStatus.txt -- Ubuntu 9.10 P5Q-E Sata300 Tx4 AHCI Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-14 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481013] Re: NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11
After a reboot, the screensaver did activate. However, the LCD display did not appear to fully turn off when it should have. I expected it to enter the no-signal low power state where the power light would turn amber. It never reached this state although it did go blank. In addition, 9.10 was never put to sleep. I was able to see the failures to turn the LCD display off properly followed by failure to sleep, by waiting the indicated times (3min for screensaver, 5min for turn off of LCD display and 10min more for OS sleep) after logging on. -- NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 480969] [NEW] Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive. Hibernate 9.10 via menu option then wait for a complete shutdown. Push power button. During power-up observe message concerning waking up. Select 9.04 from the Grub menu, Wait for the login prompt then login. Restart and then select 9.10. Notice that a normal 9.10 Cold Start has been executed. The 9.10 condition prior to hibernation has been LOST. Hibernation SHOULD be associated with a given OS not merely with a power-cycle. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Nov 11 14:07:25 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1833): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1833): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (nautilus:1934): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:1954): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480969 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 480969] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11
FYI - This should not matter, but the PC manifesting the failure is a desktop. -- Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480969 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 480969] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551282/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551283/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35551284/ProcStatus.txt -- Ubuntu 9.10 Return From Hibernation Problem 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480969 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481013] [NEW] NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive. NVIDIA 9500gt video card. Screensaver fails to activate although test modes operate correctly. Either Suspend and Hibenate can each be successfully executed via the panel menu which suggests that the environment can execute either. This could be caused by a problem with the video card, it's driver or the OS. I don't have an environment in which I can easily make that determination. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Nov 11 15:09:49 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-15.50-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae i686 ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 481013] Re: NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553005/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553007/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553008/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35553009/XsessionErrors.txt -- NVIDIA 9500gt - Ubuntu 9.10 Screensaver Fails to Activate 2009-11-11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481013 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 477425] Re: Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
FYI Just reproduced this problem via Kernel Linux 2.6.31-15-generic-pae GNOME 2.28.1 -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 477425] [NEW] Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-rtm, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive 9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for each and allows me to mount following authorization. This problem did not manifest in 8.10 or 9.04. However, it is very obvious in 9.10 Betas and rtm. 9.10-rtm incorrectly displays drive size and the fact that it contains and extended partition as the label. Something like 620 GB Extended. A time-out error occurs a short while after authorization has been completed. karmic-desktop-i386 2009-10-20_2325.iso was downloaded using 9.04. Unetbootin was used on 9.04 to create an installation USB. All three SATA drives are attached to the same controller. All three drives function properly under 9.04-rtm. Only the first SATA drive functions properly under 9.10-rtm. Someone had to be exhausted for this to be overlooked in a sanity check. The partition used for the 9.10-rtm install was formatted as Ext3 during the installation. The failure, which is 100% repeatable, occurred following the initial install and also after completion of the update process earlier this evening. Also, the Removable Media menu entry disappears following the upgrade from the initial install and all partitions are listed under places. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Nov 7 05:21:48 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic-pae i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1888): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1888): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2007): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed (nautilus:1988): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 477425] Re: Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310366/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310367/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35310371/ProcStatus.txt -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 477425] Re: Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive
After executing the try Ubuntu-9.10 option from the LiveCD, I cannot access a second or third SATA drive. Symptoms seem identical to those described above. Functionality that worked correctly in 8.10 and 9.04 got broken in 9.10. -- Problems mounting second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477425 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 477789] [NEW] Ubuntu 9.10 Firefox HANGS!
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp This failure can occur if Firefox has windows open, even if the user is not directly interacting with any of them. One failure occurred while interacting with Places, but it usually occurs during interaction with a Firefox window. This failure has not occurred when only a single Firefox window is open. In 9.04, this could happen a few times a month. In 9.10, this failure seems to occur several times in a given week. When this failure occurs, power cycling or use of Ctrl-Alt-Backspace will be required to reset the system. Unfortunately, power cycling is sometimes the only way to reset the system when this failure occurs. My shared (XP/Ubuntu) data partition is formatted NTFS. That partition was trashed when this failure occurred before I had configured the X-window restart key sequence because a large 4GB file transfer was interrupted by power cycling. However, that data partition would probably have been trashed had it been formatted Ext3. Lesson learned. Execute large file transfers using XP until this failure gets corrected. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Nov 7 12:36:23 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic-pae SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic-pae i686 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:1906): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:1906): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (nautilus:2004): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:2027): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Ubuntu 9.10 Firefox HANGS! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 477789] Re: Ubuntu 9.10 Firefox HANGS!
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330414/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330415/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35330416/ProcStatus.txt -- Ubuntu 9.10 Firefox HANGS! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477789 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 460201] [NEW] cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: yelp Triple boot system (XP, 9.10-Beta, 9.04-rtm) all contained on the first SATA drive 9.04-rtm recognizes second and third SATA drives, displays proper label for each and allows me to mount following authorization. 9.10-Beta incorrectly displays drive size and the fact that it contains and extended partition as the label. Something like 620 GB Extended. A time-out error occurs a short while after authorization has been completed. karmic-desktop-i386 2009-10-20_2325.iso was downloaded using 9.04. Unetbootin was used on 9.04 to create an installation USB. All three SATA drives are attached to the same controller. All three drives function properly under 9.04-rtm. Only the first SATA drive functions properly under 9.10-Beta. Someone had to be exhausted for this to be overlooked in a sanity check. The partition used for the 9.10-Beta install was formatted as Ext3 during the installation. The failure occurred following the initial install and also after completion of the update process earlier this evening. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Oct 24 21:11:45 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/yelp InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release Candidate i386 (20091020.3) Package: yelp 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: yelp Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 ** Affects: yelp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 460201] Re: cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346084/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346085/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346086/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34346087/XsessionErrors.txt -- cannot mount second or third SATA hard drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to yelp in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 354029] Re: Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target CD is FULL
BUG appears to have be fixed in Brasero 2.26.0 (jaunty 9.04 beta). Thanks -- Brasero disk burning software fails disk copy complaining that the blank target CD is FULL https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354029 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
