[Bug 349607] Re: Codec manager does not find bad codecs

2009-04-22 Thread GabrielGrant
I'm working right now so I'm not able to check at the moment, but I don't think that universe is initially enabled - only main and restricted. (I originally only looked in the System Administration Software Sources sense, and though I assumed this just parses the sources.list when started and is

[Bug 349607] Re: Codec manager does not find bad codecs

2009-04-22 Thread GabrielGrant
To confirm: I just checked, and universe is indeed _not_ initially enabled in sources.list (and thus also in SystemAdministrationSoftware Sources) Should the Codec installer be searching Universe when its not enabled? Right now it is not. Or should the popup message displayed when trying to open

[Bug 349607] Re: Codec manager does not find bad codecs

2009-04-19 Thread GabrielGrant
It seems likely to me that this is caused by the same root problem as #363594 -- Codec manager does not find bad codecs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349607 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 349607] Re: Codec manager does not find bad codecs

2009-04-19 Thread GabrielGrant
...sorry, submitted that comment too soon...(no comment editing...grumble grumble) My point was, Michael, that if I disable Universe repo, and try playing the stream provided by Gabriele, it doesn't find any codecs (No packages with the requested plugins found when trying to play that stream. The

[Bug 363594] [NEW] Videos found with Totem's Youtube plugin don't play

2009-04-18 Thread GabrielGrant
Public bug reported: I'm using today's (April 18th) current daily ubu...@ubuntu:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 9.04 Release:9.04 ##My Actions## Boot from a (non-persistent) USB stick created with today's daily CD Open Totem Select YouTube from the dropdown Search for kitties

[Bug 147078] Re: [gusty] Syntax Highlighting tab is no longer present in the preferences dialogue

2007-09-30 Thread GabrielGrant
Apparently what I have called a bug is in fact a feature. According to http://www.gnome.org/start/2.20/notes/en/index.html #rnusers-gedit, the color schemes are actually for syntax highlighting, not for the user interface as I implied. However, I still have yet to find any mechanism for editing

[Bug 147078] Re: [gusty] Syntax Highlighting tab is no longer present in the preferences dialogue

2007-09-30 Thread GabrielGrant
Here is a source file (written in Cell SPU assembly) that should take advantage of source highlighting from the custom .lang file above. In Feisty it looks good, but in Gutsy, only the comments are highlighted (as blue by default) ** Attachment added: Cell SPU assembly file that should be

[Bug 117732] Re: ABI changed without a corresponding soname change

2007-09-30 Thread GabrielGrant
Sarah: That's true, but it I thought a bug isn't supposed to be marked as Fix Released until the fix is, in fact, available. Is that not the intended distinction between the Fix Committed and Fix Released statuses? Thanks, -Gabriel -- ABI changed without a corresponding soname change

[Bug 147078] [gusty] Syntax Highlighting tab is no longer present in the preferences dialogue

2007-09-29 Thread GabrielGrant
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gedit Opening the gedit Preferences dialogue (Edit-Preferences) no long has a tab for Syntax Highlighting as it does in Feisty. While the FontsColours tab now has Color Schemes, there does not appear to be any way to remap color preferences for Syntax

[Bug 134134] Re: [gutsy] no default application for ogg files

2007-09-13 Thread GabrielGrant
I think that if ubuntu sax.ogg isn't working then the fix isn't in yet...I believe that the video worked all along, it was just the audio files that were causing problems. -Gabriel -- [gutsy] no default application for ogg files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134134 You received this bug

[Bug 134134] Re: [gutsy] no default application for ogg files

2007-09-08 Thread GabrielGrant
A couple notes: First, as of today's daily desktop live image, this is still a problem...are we expecting to merge the upstream patch before beta freeze? Second, does the patch also address .spx files? fables_01_01_aesop.spx from the Examples directory on the live cd throws the same error when

[Bug 102054] Re: Window screenshot does a desktop screenshot

2007-04-02 Thread GabrielGrant
(Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = GabrielGrant Status: Unconfirmed = Needs Info -- Window screenshot does a desktop screenshot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug contact for gnome-utils