[Bug 1847551] Re: Mutter 3.34.1 broke Night Light, screen color profiles
It has been fixed in Fedora and Arch, where is the fix for Ubuntu? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847551 Title: Mutter 3.34.1 broke Night Light, screen color profiles To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1847551/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1847551] Re: Mutter 3.34.1 broke Night Light, screen color profiles
Is there a testing package including the fix that we could test please? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847551 Title: Mutter 3.34.1 broke Night Light, screen color profiles To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1847551/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1831384] Re: .desktop files not working in Ubuntu 19.04 Gnome
In gnome-shell itself, in overview mode and either as favorite or not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831384 Title: .desktop files not working in Ubuntu 19.04 Gnome To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1831384/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1831384] Re: .desktop files not working in Ubuntu 19.04 Gnome
Log in journalctl: gnome-shell[610]: g_environ_setenv: assertion 'value != NULL' failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831384 Title: .desktop files not working in Ubuntu 19.04 Gnome To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1831384/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1831384] Re: .desktop files not working in Ubuntu 19.04 Gnome
** Package changed: ubuntu => gnome-shell (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-shell in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831384 Title: .desktop files not working in Ubuntu 19.04 Gnome To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1831384/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1691678] Re: Scrollbars escape the bottom and right side of the Terminal window by 1px
upstream bug report confirms that this is a bug in Ubuntu: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-terminal/issues/132 ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-terminal/issues #132 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-terminal/issues/132 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1691678 Title: Scrollbars escape the bottom and right side of the Terminal window by 1px To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1691678/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 1239087]
Same issue here, reported there: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278944 It is not consistent between disks, even when there are from the same vendor or the same model. Of course, the controller may be totally different. Note that it all cases, they spin down correctly under Mac OS or Windows. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-disk-utility in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239087 Title: Safely remove is not working (or broken) in Gnome Disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/1239087/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 792085] Re: Automatic remount of safely removed usb 3.0 drive
I described there : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278944 or there : https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71802 I don't think it is related only to USB 3 or Nautilus. It is a larger udisk or kernel issue with some micro-controllers... ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1278944 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278944 ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #71802 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71802 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/792085 Title: Automatic remount of safely removed usb 3.0 drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/792085/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 898388] [NEW] Evolution randomly crashes because of invalid pointer with free()
Public bug reported: Evolution randomly crashes, even when it is left open with no user interaction. Here is the backtrace : $ evolution *** glibc detected *** evolution: free(): invalid pointer: 0x7fd0cc1031c0 *** === Backtrace: = /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x78a96)[0x7fd0cbde1a96] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(cfree+0x6c)[0x7fd0cbde5d7c] /usr/lib/evolution/3.2/plugins/liborg-gnome-evolution-bbdb.so(+0x3cb6)[0x7fd0a2da2cb6] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(+0x6a2b6)[0x7fd0cc1722b6] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x7efc)[0x7fd0cd41aefc] /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7fd0cbe4a89d] === Memory map: 7fd08fd4f000-7fd08fd5 ---p 00:00 0 7fd08fd5-7fd09055 rw-p 00:00 0 7fd09055-7fd09055b000 r-xp 08:06 664814 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_ispell.so 7fd09055b000-7fd09075b000 ---p b000 08:06 664814 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_ispell.so 7fd09075b000-7fd09075c000 r--p b000 08:06 664814 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_ispell.so 7fd09075c000-7fd09075d000 rw-p c000 08:06 664814 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_ispell.so 7fd09075d000-7fd0907a9000 r-xp 08:06 659446 /usr/lib/libhunspell-1.2.so.0.0.0 7fd0907a9000-7fd0909a8000 ---p 0004c000 08:06 659446 /usr/lib/libhunspell-1.2.so.0.0.0 7fd0909a8000-7fd0909a9000 r--p 0004b000 08:06 659446 /usr/lib/libhunspell-1.2.so.0.0.0 7fd0909a9000-7fd0909ad000 rw-p 0004c000 08:06 659446 /usr/lib/libhunspell-1.2.so.0.0.0 7fd0909ad000-7fd0909b1000 r-xp 08:06 664815 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_myspell.so 7fd0909b1000-7fd090bb1000 ---p 4000 08:06 664815 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_myspell.so 7fd090bb1000-7fd090bb2000 r--p 4000 08:06 664815 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_myspell.so 7fd090bb2000-7fd090bb3000 rw-p 5000 08:06 664815 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_myspell.so 7fd090bb3000-7fd090c7 r-xp 08:06 659051 /usr/lib/libaspell.so.15.1.4 7fd090c7-7fd090e7 ---p 000bd000 08:06 659051 /usr/lib/libaspell.so.15.1.4 7fd090e7-7fd090e76000 r--p 000bd000 08:06 659051 /usr/lib/libaspell.so.15.1.4 7fd090e76000-7fd090e77000 rw-p 000c3000 08:06 659051 /usr/lib/libaspell.so.15.1.4 7fd090e77000-7fd090e7f000 rw-p 00:00 0 7fd090e7f000-7fd090e81000 r-xp 08:06 664785 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_aspell.so 7fd090e81000-7fd09108 ---p 2000 08:06 664785 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_aspell.so 7fd09108-7fd091081000 r--p 1000 08:06 664785 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_aspell.so 7fd091081000-7fd091082000 rw-p 2000 08:06 664785 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_aspell.so 7fd091082000-7fd09108d000 r-xp 08:06 664801 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_hspell.so 7fd09108d000-7fd09128c000 ---p b000 08:06 664801 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_hspell.so 7fd09128c000-7fd09128d000 r--p a000 08:06 664801 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_hspell.so 7fd09128d000-7fd09129 rw-p b000 08:06 664801 /usr/lib/enchant/libenchant_hspell.so 7fd09129-7fd091291000 ---p 00:00 0 7fd091291000-7fd091a91000 rw-p 00:00 0 7fd091a91000-7fd091a92000 ---p 00:00 0 7fd091a92000-7fd092292000 rw-p 00:00 0 7fd092292000-7fd092293000 ---p 00:00 0 7fd092293000-7fd092a93000 rw-p 00:00 0 7fd092a93000-7fd092a99000 r-xp 08:06 791625 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-gif.so 7fd092a99000-7fd092c98000 ---p 6000 08:06 791625 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-gif.so 7fd092c98000-7fd092c99000 r--p 5000 08:06 791625 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-gif.so 7fd092c99000-7fd092c9a000 rw-p 6000 08:06 791625 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-gif.so 7fd09349b000-7fd09349c000 ---p 00:00 0 7fd09349c000-7fd093c9c000 rw-p 00:00 0 7fd093c9c000-7fd093c9d000 ---p 00:00 0 7fd093c9d000-7fd09449d000 rw-p 00:00 0 7fd094c9e000-7fd094c9f000 ---p 00:00 0 7fd094c9f000-7fd09549f000 rw-p 00:00 0 7fd09549f000-7fd0954a3000 r-xp 08:06 2376 /usr/lib/evolution/3.2/plugins/liborg-gnome-evolution-attachment-reminder.so 7fd0954a3000-7fd0956a3000 ---p 4000 08:06 2376 /usr/lib/evolution/3.2/plugins/liborg-gnome-evolution-attachment-reminder.so 7fd0956a3000-7fd0956a4000 r--p
[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server
Simply, it has always been a show-stopper for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 Title: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution/+bug/13983/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 819156] Re: regression: totem do not disables screensaver
Same problem here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to totem in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/819156 Title: regression: totem do not disables screensaver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/819156/+subscriptions -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 637568] Re: Ping imap locks up evolution for ~30 sec
As far as I am concerned, it has been solved using the IMAP+ protocol, as soon as Evolution started to support it. It can be reproduced anytime using the basic IMAP protocol though, so I am not sure if it is an expected behavior or a workaround. Anyway, I definitely adopted Thunderbird which doesn't have such an issue and is much faster in any case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637568 Title: Ping imap locks up evolution for ~30 sec -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 458334] Re: Fails repeatably with DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found
I am having this problem on one of my maverick machines. -- Fails repeatably with DBus error org.gtk.Private.RemoteVolumeMonitor.NotFound: The given volume was not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 637568] Re: Ping imap locks up evolution for ~30 sec
It also affects me, on Maverick. -- Ping imap locks up evolution for ~30 sec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637568 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 637568] Re: Ping imap locks up evolution for ~30 sec
And what's weired is that pinging is allowed on my server, so I don't know what Evolution is actually trying to do... -- Ping imap locks up evolution for ~30 sec https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637568 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 38154] Re: Error with pinging an imap server, when I work offline
This bug had disappeared for me until Lucid, but it came back with 10.10. Was it patched or fixed accordingly ? -- Error with pinging an imap server, when I work offline https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 38154] Re: Error with pinging an imap server, when I work offline
This bug had disappeared for me until Lucid, but it came back with 10.10. Was it patched or fixed accordingly ? -- Error with pinging an imap server, when I work offline https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 200960] Re: gnome-screensaver fails marking the session as idle
I have seen this problem with : - a NVidia NVS 140 M card, using the Nvidia driver (169.09) - an Intel 945 GM card, and the intel driver -- gnome-screensaver fails marking the session as idle https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200960 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 200960] Re: gnome-screensaver fails marking the session as idle
I don't have any /var/crash, and nothing from the terminal. It just starts the daemon and in general it will work well the first few times. -- gnome-screensaver fails marking the session as idle https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200960 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 200960] Re: gnome-screensaver fails marking the session as idle
Nothing in syslog, but there is a line in .xsession-error : ** (totem:7460): WARNING **: Detected that GNOME screensaver has left the bus closing -- gnome-screensaver fails marking the session as idle https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200960 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 131885] Re: Backlight no longer under my control on battery
David, I have sometimes experienced what you mention (in a train), but I think this is an issue we can live with. In that case the problem is not g-p-m but the power source. I think that there is no easy way to deal with it, and we should not have something too complex for such some extreme and rare situation. On what basis will you consider a change is frequent or not ? It might be an issue in some cases. I would be happy if, in a first time, the previous functions - quite more urgent - are implemented. Concerning the timeout your talk about, I believe that it already exists : invalid_timeout in the gconf parameters. -- Backlight no longer under my control on battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 131885] Re: Backlight no longer under my control on battery
Thank you for this patch, quite an improvement. However I disagree with the point of view of Keenan, I think the big issue is that the gnome brightness setting is still not synchronized with the hardware setting (set with the keyboard). This is pretty confusing for the user to set brightness to 100% with the keyboard, and that every time g-p-m is doing some action, it resets it to, let's say, 50%. Both should be synchronized, there should be a unique way to set the system brightness. It is less annoying if you use the brightness applet, because it seems to prevent g-p-m to take over the hardware setting. But again my point of view is that such an applet should even not exist : there are 3 now ways to set the brightness !!! And also, using 14 Mo of RAM for a usability workaround is not acceptable. -- Backlight no longer under my control on battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 131885] Re: Backlight no longer under my control on battery
I guess what I think is joining what Kyle says, but to be sure I clarify what I meant : There are 2 different settings : - the defaults values that g-p-m applies when the power state changes - the current value in each power state, which is temporary for the current state The scenario : g-p-m is set to 100% brightness on AC and 25% on battery. I am on AC, and change the brightness level using the keyboard to 70%. I switch to battery. The brightness becomes 25%. Using the keyboard, I adjust it to 5%. I plug the AC in. The brightness becomes 100%. I plug it out again. The brightness is back to 25%. What do you think about it ? -- Backlight no longer under my control on battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 131885] Re: Backlight no longer under my control on battery
Keenan, that's exactly what I thought. I don't have an ambient light sensor, so I have no experience using it. However, I tend to believe that the sensor should deal with the temporary setting only... -- Backlight no longer under my control on battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 200960] [NEW] gnome-screensaver fails marking the session as idle
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-screensaver I have seen this bug for months. Randomly but very often, Gnome-Screensaver seems to freeze and stop marking the session as idle. As a result : - the screensaver never appears; - and the most annoying, gnome-power-manager never suspend anything, because it is based on the gnome-screensaver idle marking. So I often found my computer screen had stayed on for hours, until I use this quick and dirty sequence in a script that I start every 30 min with cron : #!/bin/bash export DISPLAY=:0.0 killall gnome-screensaver sleep 1 gnome-screensaver I don't know how to provide more information as there is no visible crash. Please let me know how I can help. It would be great if this problem were seriously investigated, I think it is an important issue. ** Affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-screensaver fails marking the session as idle https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200960 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-screensaver in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 131885] Re: Backlight no longer under my control on battery
Confirmed with my brand new Thinkpad T61. This is a rather important issue, and it does not seem to evoluate at all ! -- Backlight no longer under my control on battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-power-manager in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
