[Bug 525827] Re: window decoration is displayed around AwnDialogs

2010-02-23 Thread Mark Lee
This seems to be a GTK+ bug, not an Awn bug. ** Changed in: awn Status: In Progress = Invalid ** Changed in: awn Assignee: Cody Russell (bratsche) = (unassigned) ** Also affects: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu)

[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3

2010-01-30 Thread Mark Lee
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 514562 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514562 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 514281 lost gconf schema defaults ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 514562 Default values stripped from schemas with empty short_desc attribute

[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after today's update in lucid

2010-01-29 Thread Mark Lee
This means that this is a GConf problem, not an Awn problem...unless someone can prove that this bug affects more than just gconf2-2.28.0-1ubuntu3 (and associated packages from the gconf source package). ** Changed in: awn Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Also affects: gconf2 (Ubuntu)

[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3

2010-01-29 Thread Mark Lee
It seems that there has been a new release of gconf in Lucid - 2.28.0-1ubuntu4. Please upgrade to that and see if this fixes the problem. The changelog entry for that release seems to indicate that some database corruption occurred with 2.28.0-1ubuntu3. ** Changed in: gconf (Ubuntu)

[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3

2010-01-29 Thread Mark Lee
Did you restart your X session after upgrading gconf? -- awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gconf in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3

2010-01-29 Thread Mark Lee
You might also want to re-install the avant-window-navigator-trunk package, just in case. -- awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514134 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3

2010-01-29 Thread Mark Lee
Oops, sorry. I meant avant-window-navigator. I'm still of the opinion that this is a GConf problem. Please try the following command, which should reset your panel's settings: gconftool-2 --recursive-unset /apps/instances/avant-window- navigator/panel-1 -- awn disappeared after update to gconf

[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3

2010-01-29 Thread Mark Lee
If the unset panel config command doesn't work, try this one: gconftool-2 --recursive-unset /apps/avant-window-navigator If that doesn't work, then I'm currently out of ideas. -- awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514134 You received this bug

[Bug 514134] Re: awn disappeared after update to gconf 2.28.0-1ubuntu3

2010-01-29 Thread Mark Lee
I do not currently know how to fix this problem, sorry. What you could attempt to do is the following: 1. Uninstall Awn. 2. Run both of the gconftool-2 commands from earlier in the bug. 3. Re-install Awn. It's possible that this sequence of commands could reset GConf to do what we want it to

[Bug 398008] Re: awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw)

2009-08-12 Thread Mark Lee
However (but I should search if there is an other existing bug for that) there is a with compiz when preview's thumbnail plugin is activated : when it should draw the thumbnail compiz crash. This is true with both awn packages (from Julien's ppa and universe repository). Offhand, this doesn't

[Bug 398008] Re: awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw)

2009-08-12 Thread Mark Lee
The Awn developers are marking this as Invalid, as the regressions have been fixed upstream in GTK+ (without any changes in the Awn package). Thanks to the reporters who helped debug this. ** Changed in: avant-window-navigator (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- awn uses 100% cpu

[Bug 398008] Re: awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw)

2009-07-27 Thread Mark Lee
Yeah, I kind of figured. FWIW, we (the Awn devs) are waiting for the GTK devs to respond to a performance analysis that was attached to the bug last week. -- awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398008 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 398008] Re: awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw)

2009-07-26 Thread Mark Lee
FYI, that patch is in GTK+ 2.17.6: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gtk+/commit/?id=d84b575cd0a4cb411489007687086149c5c670cd -- awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a

[Bug 398008] Re: awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw)

2009-07-20 Thread Mark Lee
Attention Karmic users: Upstream has asked for a stacktrace. Here's the (relatively) quick way to get it: 1. Install bug-buddy and the debug packages for GTK and libawn: `sudo apt-get install bug-buddy libawn0-dbg libgtk2.0-0-dbg` 2. Run Awn from the terminal, with bug-buddy enabled and

[Bug 398008] Re: awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw)

2009-07-20 Thread Mark Lee
IIRC, bug-buddy doesn't need to be configured at all. If you run the command in #2 in the terminal exactly, it should crash. To reiterate, the command to run is as follows: GTK_MODULES=gnomebreakpad G_DEBUG=fatal_criticals avant-window-navigator -- awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw)

[Bug 398008] Re: awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw)

2009-07-20 Thread Mark Lee
Thanks, Bmw1000c and Wayne Cat. I'm forwarding one of the stacktraces upstream (as they're essentially the same thing). -- awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 398008] Re: awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw)

2009-07-20 Thread Mark Lee
@ Bmw1000c and Wayne Cat: 1. Are you positive that libawn0-dbg is installed? 2. Could you confirm that the bug still exists with GTK+ 2.17.5 (recently added to Karmic)? -- awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398008 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 398389] Re: avant-window-navigator makes desktop freeze on start

2009-07-12 Thread Mark Lee
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 398008 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398008 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 398008 awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw) -- avant-window-navigator makes desktop freeze on start https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398389 You received

[Bug 398008] Re: awn uses 100% cpu

2009-07-11 Thread Mark Lee
** Also affects: gtk+2.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - awn uses 100% cpu + awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw) -- awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398008 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 398008] Re: [karmic] awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw)

2009-07-11 Thread Mark Lee
** Summary changed: - awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw) + [karmic] awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw) -- [karmic] awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 398008] Re: [karmic] awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw)

2009-07-11 Thread Mark Lee
See also bug #398250 for another app that doesn't work with the GDK rewrite (and I'd call that app critical...). -- [karmic] awn uses 100% cpu with gtk+ 2.17.3 (csw) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 357273] Re: awn-notification-daemon randomly overrides notify-osd

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Lee
Fix released in Awn Extras 0.3.2.2. ** Changed in: awn-extras Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- awn-notification-daemon randomly overrides notify-osd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357273 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is

[Bug 357273] Re: awn-notification-daemon randomly overrides notify-osd

2009-04-15 Thread Mark Lee
** Changed in: awn-extras Milestone: None = 0.3.2.2 -- awn-notification-daemon randomly overrides notify-osd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357273 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to notification-daemon in ubuntu. --

[Bug 357273] Re: notify-osd randomly reverts to old notification system

2009-04-08 Thread Mark Lee
If you want to use the notify-osd system, don't use Awn Notification Daemon. A-N-D is essentially a stock version of notification-daemon, with a theme engine customization. No notify-osd support exists in the Awn applet. I suppose having a Provides in the package is reasonable, but it seems that

[Bug 341487] Re: [Jaunty 9.04 alpha5] 'don't cover the bar' options doesn't work

2009-03-12 Thread Mark Lee
Just to be clear, my previous comment only applied to Awn (proper). -- [Jaunty 9.04 alpha5] 'don't cover the bar' options doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in

[Bug 341487] Re: [Jaunty 9.04 alpha5] 'don't cover the bar' options doesn't work

2009-03-12 Thread Mark Lee
Marking as Won't Fix, as the fix is in Metacity, even though Awn is affected by it (according to the upstream bug, GNOME Panel is also affected). ** Changed in: awn Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix -- [Jaunty 9.04 alpha5] 'don't cover the bar' options doesn't work

[Bug 281957] Re: required dependency no longer available libgnome-desktop-2 Intrepid

2008-10-11 Thread Mark Lee
the avant-window-navigator-bzr package (and associated packages) are created by a third party. Please inform them at the packages' official ubuntuforums thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=762363 The Awn Testing PPA packages (maintained by the Awn developers) is not affected. **