I am pretty sure the bug most of us are experiencing is
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735953
which by the way was fixed in git.
So I'm reassigning from gvfs to gtk+3.0 .
The patch in comment 7:
https://bug735953.bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=285251
should really
You are right, sorry for the noise.
** Package changed: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu) = ubuntu
** Package changed: ubuntu = gvfs (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/202861
Title:
nautilus
Please forget my last comment- I just saw bug #1072442, which concerns
the new issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution-data-server in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/846550
Title:
Address book is
I just linked a question which concerns the same bug, and I'm also
experiencing it with evolution 3.6.0-0ubuntu3. So I would like to
reopen, for Quantal, but it's not clear to me if I'm missing the
permissions to do so (or I'm just plain stupid).
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #660870
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660870
** Changed in: evolution
Importance: Undecided = Unknown
** Changed in: evolution
Status: New = Unknown
** Changed in: evolution
Remote watch: None = GNOME Bug Tracker #660870
--
You
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: zenity
Binary package hint: zenity
straightforward
See bug #50349 more more info.
** Affects: zenity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
no man page for gdialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681578
You received this bug
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: zenity
-
Binary package hint: zenity
straightforward
See bug #50349 more more info.
--
no man page for gdialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681578
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
I would sincerely like to know the rationale, or the guideline, for
which closed bugs must not be re-opened.
But anyway: see bug #681578
--
no man page for gdialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50349
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
Il giorno sab, 01/05/2010 alle 00.50 +, Avetik Topchyan ha scritto:
@soundpartner, firstly, thanks for the script!
My hope is that some bright mind would not suddenly decide
tomorrow to move these buttons to the bottom of the screen by default.
Eureka! what a great innovation would
Il giorno dom, 25/04/2010 alle 14.04 +, scholli ha scritto:
I did updates since Beta1 and I don't have this feature what is shown in
the attached screenshot. But now I see that it exists and probably I
have to do a fresh install with the final release for get it working
finally. But seeing
Brainstorm is just a technicality. The point is that
- many users thought of Ubuntu's organization as a democracy without
burocracy: when you have a nice mission (Linux for human beings), a
nice codebase to start from (Debian), a nice group of people and a nice
capital to start, who cares about
This is not a forum, guys. I humbly suggest opening a thread on Ubuntu
forums and stop spamming here.
--
[Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
The theme-dependent buttons are _bad news_, for two reasons:
1) they make clear that the experiment is much more than an experiment
2) the reason for the switch was to put something new (and certainly
great - though unfortunately secret, at the moment) on the right side:
it means that whatever
Many right things have been said (and scarcely considerated, but that's
another story), just one added observation: all comments of the form
they're just buttons, you can change it, and partially also you can
change distribution are simply irresponsible.
_I_ can change it, and probably will. But
Il giorno ven, 26/03/2010 alle 10.41 +, Imre Gergely ha scritto:
@Pietro Battiston: I don't think you can be 100% sure that Debian (or
any other distro) won't do something in the future you will dislike...
I'm 100% sure it won't do something that the majority dislikes,
justifying
Il giorno ven, 26/03/2010 alle 20.41 +, Pako ha scritto:
Well, the time is running and there is still no particular reason and
argument, why should be the right buttons retained.
Please, at this point we are all taking as _obvious_ that right buttons
are to be retained _in absence_ of a
Karmic 64 bit: disclaimer.pdf.ps gives me no more problems,
output_1.ps never did; however the first time I opened 2009.ps, clicking
from Firefox, evince segfaulted, and I got
[27306.043901] evince[8793]: segfault at 7fa423d28000 ip
7fa445dc261b sp 7fff2715bb48 error 4 in
Certainly, if we judge its fixed state from the current stable, it's
fix _released_
** Changed in: libcairo (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
evince crashes on .ps file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296701
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Summary changed:
- Empathy sometimes fails to connect to an IRC server
+ Empathy sometimes fails to reconnect to IRC servers
--
Empathy sometimes fails to reconnect to IRC servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456326
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Yes, I would say it is the same bug
** Changed in: empathy (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
Empathy sometimes fails to reconnect to IRC servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456326
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
I don't know at what time the link disappeared, but in Karmic man
gdialog again gives No manual entry for gdialog..
** Changed in: zenity (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Confirmed
--
no man page for gdialog
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/50349
You received this bug notification because
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35079985/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35079986/Disassembly.txt
** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35079987/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evolution-data-server
Apport started automatically, I have no particular info to add.
ProblemType: Crash
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Nov 4 07:31:21 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/evolution/evolution-data-server-2.28
In Karmic, package glade refers to glade 3 (and glade 2 doesn't
exist).
It's somewhat sad that the command glade disappeared (instead than
pointing to glade3), but still the bug is solved.
** Changed in: glade (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
glade package still refers to glade-2
** Attachment added: CoreDump.gz
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25111601/CoreDump.gz
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25111602/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: Disassembly.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25111603/Disassembly.txt
** Attachment
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: glade
glade-3 is out since a lot of time now, but the package glade gives
still glade-2, very obsolete and unsupported
Though some people still use glade-2, they certainly know they need it. Instead
a newbie wanting to try glade may not know it's
Notice Debian seems to have finally solved that (though a sync of their
glade - which is glade-3 - is not recommended, since they have an
older version than us... and the same is valid for glade-2)
--
glade package still refers to glade-2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358502
You received this
sudo apt-get install glade installing glade-2 is a bug, not a wish
(personally, I know perfectly the difference between 2 and 3, and
install the one I need), exactly as sudo apt-get install firefox
installing firefox 2 would be. I'd like jaunty not to have bugs. That's
all I have to say as a
As far as I know, the fact that a SUSE corresponding bug is linked from
here doesn't extend the scope of this page to how/which SUSE packages
can be patched.
Also notice my patch didn't solve the problem for everybody. Anyway, you can
find the patch itself in
I have absolutely _no_ idea of how a SUSE package must be patched (I
don't even know how it must be compiled).
I'm not trying to be unpolite, I'm just trying to suggest that _this_ is
not the right place to ask what you need.
--
[regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora
I'm trying to reproduce, and maybe a couple of times was successful, so
I'm starting to think to some gcc misbehaviour (or, more realistically,
some libgnomecanvas misbehaviour exposed only by some gcc)... does the
bug also imply painful slowliness i.e. when resizing?
Andcor, do you have i386
The ubuntu-compiled package that was installed by default in intrepid
depends on which channels you have enabled, but notice that for instance
in
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libgnomecanvassearchon=namessuite=intrepid
you still get libgnomecanvas_2.20.1.1-1ubuntu2, which yes, has
Actually, the package was tested by many and reported to work; it is
true that without the patch the bug is not here, however notice the
patch is not intended to solve this bug, but another one (having to do
with tearing), so this is not strange.
Are you sure you didn't someway take the old
Here it is.
As far as I can tell, the program crashes every time I zoom in more than
100%. If the last time I saw the file I was zooming more than 100%, it
crashes immediately.
** Attachment added: Backtrace of the crash
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20556768/gdb-evince.txt
** Attachment
Here it is, really
** Attachment added: Backtrace
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20556837/gdb-evince.txt
--
evince crashes on .ps file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296701
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
Oopss.. just noticed that the I'm unable to trigger the crash using
output_1.ps file provided by DragonK, so I can't no more be sure we
really are affected by the same bug.
I'm attaching the ps file that triggers the bug to me.
** Attachment added: The file triggering the bug to Toobaz
Last precisation: to trigger the bug I have to rotate the file 90°
clockwise _and then_ zoom over 100%.
I'm also noticing a very strange thing: almost every time I reproduce the
crash, Firefox hangs (doesn't even draw the content of its windows) and I have
to kill it... it may be a coincidence,
OK, firefox just hanged and I wasn't reproducing the bug; forget last
part of my last comment.
--
evince crashes on .ps file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296701
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.
--
desktop-bugs
I have exactly the same bug, I can reproduce it reliably but my
/var/crash remains empty.
If I am given further instructions on how to post useful info, I will do
it.
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Confirmed
--
evince crashes on .ps file
I have exactly the same bug, I can reproduce it reliably but my
/var/crash remains empty.
If I am given further instructions on how to post useful info, I will do
it.
--
evince crashes on .ps file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296701
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Problem solved. Yes, I think it was a problem with my mirror
(it.archive.ubuntu.com), but it disappeared, sorry for not checking
before.
--
[regression, intrepid] redraw problems, patches from fedora
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272316
You received this bug notification because you are a
I'm - obviously - using it and it works.
However there is a small problem - don't know if this is another bug or
something that usually happens with libraries backporting and is
considered normal: if one has proposed enabled, it is impossible to
install libgnomecanvas2-dev, because it is still
Here is a patch targeted intrepid-proposed (I don't think Jaunty needs
it).
Notice it does not give credit to Joe Smith only because I went to this
bug trought #284530, so didn't see his debdiff (and in fact the
resolution is _slightly_ different).
I already tested the patch (in xournal) and
43 matches
Mail list logo
