[Bug 1764417] Re: Unrecoverable failure in required component org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop

2018-10-23 Thread Rob Speer
Just had the same thing happen to me, on recently-updated Ubuntu 18.04.

Here are my journalctl entries from the crash (including the one from 2
seconds before in case they're relevant):

```
Oct 23 15:27:01 bad-horse code.desktop[3875]: [main 3:27:01 PM] update#setState 
idle
Oct 23 15:27:01 bad-horse code.desktop[3875]: bash: cannot set terminal process 
group (-1): Inappropriate ioctl for device
Oct 23 15:27:01 bad-horse code.desktop[3875]: bash: no job control in this shell
Oct 23 15:27:03 bad-horse gnome-session[1891]: gnome-session-binary[1891]: 
WARNING: Application 'org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop' failed to 
register before timeout
Oct 23 15:27:03 bad-horse gnome-session[1891]: gnome-session-binary[1891]: 
CRITICAL: We failed, but the fail whale is dead. Sorry
Oct 23 15:27:03 bad-horse gnome-session-binary[1891]: Unrecoverable failure in 
required component org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop
Oct 23 15:27:03 bad-horse gnome-session-binary[1891]: WARNING: Application 
'org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop' failed to register before timeout
Oct 23 15:27:03 bad-horse gnome-session-binary[1891]: CRITICAL: We failed, but 
the fail whale is dead. Sorry
Oct 23 15:27:03 bad-horse kernel: rfkill: input handler enabled
Oct 23 15:27:03 bad-horse gnome-shell[1999]: gnome-shell: Fatal IO error 0 
(Success) on X server :1.
```

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764417

Title:
  Unrecoverable failure in required component
  org.gnome.SettingsDaemon.Color.desktop

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1764417/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 1665140] Re: Emoji that should be wide, according to Unicode 9, display incorrectly in the terminal

2017-02-21 Thread Rob Speer
> I believe it's the distro's responsibility to ship glib, glibc and vim
so that all use the same Unicode version.

Sounds right, and it's good to hear that there's progress on this front.
I was afraid the situation was stagnant and it would be up to
applications to fix it.

> Or even better, but it takes more time and a heavy refactoring: There
should be a single core Unicode library that glibc, glib, vim etc. all
depend on. Unfortunately I find it unlikely to get implemented.

Working a lot with Unicode myself, the thing is that the number of
things a Unicode library could do is enormous and no application needs
all of them. Many developers consider linking to, for example, ICU to be
unacceptable bloat, and I don't blame them.

> Also note that in gnome-terminals' Profile Preferences, under the
Compatibility tab you can choose whether you want ambiguous width
characters to be narrow or wide.

I wouldn't want to set *all* ambiguous characters to be wide, like a
Japanese OS -- that would break many more things. It's only the emoji
that changed.

Thanks for the responses.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665140

Title:
  Emoji that should be wide, according to Unicode 9, display incorrectly
  in the terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1665140/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1665140] Re: Emoji that should be wide, according to Unicode 9, display incorrectly in the terminal

2017-02-15 Thread Rob Speer
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665140

Title:
  Emoji that should be wide, according to Unicode 9, display incorrectly
  in the terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1665140/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1665140] Re: Emoji that should be wide, according to Unicode 9, display incorrectly in the terminal

2017-02-15 Thread Rob Speer
** Attachment added: "Editing text containing emoji in vim within 
gnome-terminal"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1665140/+attachment/4819798/+files/terminal-emoji-glitch.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665140

Title:
  Emoji that should be wide, according to Unicode 9, display incorrectly
  in the terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1665140/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1665140] [NEW] Emoji that should be wide, according to Unicode 9, display incorrectly in the terminal

2017-02-15 Thread Rob Speer
Public bug reported:

When editing Unicode in the terminal, it is important for the terminal
and applications to agree on the width of characters. Otherwise, display
glitches will occur.

In prior versions of Unicode, the character width of emoji was
"ambiguous". As of Unicode 9, they are supposed to be double-wide and
take up two character cells. gnome-terminal displays them as
overlapping, single-wide characters, like it has for a long time. This
is a problem because many applications I use on Ubuntu now treat emoji
as double-wide. The behavior of gnome-terminal conflicts with the cursor
positioning in vim, for example.

I've long considered gnome-terminal to have the least buggy Unicode
implementation among terminal applications, and this may no longer be
the case.

The *desired behavior* of emoji is that they are double-wide: they take
up two character cells, advance the cursor by two cells when displayed,
and text-editing applications move the cursor by two cells when moving
past them. The *actual behavior* is inconsistent: typically, the emoji
advance the cursor only by one character cell, even though the text-
editing cursor moves by two character cells when moving past them,
causing the cursor to be misaligned with the text.

I hope this bug reporting interface lets me attach screenshots so I can
show the example with vim.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: gnome-terminal 3.18.3-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-57.78-generic 4.4.35
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-57-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_drm nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.5
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Wed Feb 15 16:13:31 2017
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-08-09 (190 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719)
JournalErrors:
 Error: command ['journalctl', '-b', '--priority=warning', '--lines=1000'] 
failed with exit code 1: Hint: You are currently not seeing messages from other 
users and the system.
   Users in the 'systemd-journal' group can see all messages. Pass -q to
   turn off this notice.
 No journal files were opened due to insufficient permissions.
SourcePackage: gnome-terminal
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665140

Title:
  Emoji that should be wide, according to Unicode 9, display incorrectly
  in the terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1665140/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 1665140] Re: Emoji that should be wide, according to Unicode 9, display incorrectly in the terminal

2017-02-15 Thread Rob Speer
** Attachment added: "For comparison, the same text file being edited correctly 
in gedit"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1665140/+attachment/4819800/+files/emoji-gedit.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-terminal in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665140

Title:
  Emoji that should be wide, according to Unicode 9, display incorrectly
  in the terminal

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/1665140/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 668560] Re: Ligatures appear in monospaced text

2011-07-08 Thread Rob Speer
Yes. In fact, it still happens on a machine where I installed Narwhal
from scratch.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668560

Title:
  Ligatures appear in monospaced text

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/668560/+subscriptions

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 668560] [NEW] Ligatures appear in monospaced text

2010-10-29 Thread Rob Speer
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gedit

If I am editing code with gedit, and I type the sequences of characters
fi or fl, then they will be replaced by a ligature and visually
crammed into the width of a single character.

The two characters can still be selected and edited separately, so the
bug is only visual and is not actually being introduced into the code.
However, this is still bad for many reasons:

- Ligatures are not designed for monospaced text, so they don't look right
- The sudden replacement of two characters with a ligature is visually jarring
- Because the text now takes up a different amount of horizontal space, it can 
cause text that was meant to align with the text above and below to become 
misaligned
- Ligatures in plain text sometimes appear as the result of copying text from a 
PDF into LaTeX, in which case they are a bug that needs to be fixed before the 
document will be typeset properly. gedit makes it look like my LaTeX source has 
this bug when it doesn't.

How to reproduce: Type the word final in gedit.
Expected behavior: The result should appear 5 characters wide, made of the 
glyphs f, i, n, a, and l.
Actual behavior: The result appears 4 characters wide, made of the glyphs fi, 
n, a, and l.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: gedit 2.30.3-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.35-generic 2.6.35.4
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Fri Oct 29 17:15:54 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta amd64 (20100318)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gedit

** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick ubuntu-une

-- 
Ligatures appear in monospaced text
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 668560] Re: Ligatures appear in monospaced text

2010-10-29 Thread Rob Speer


-- 
Ligatures appear in monospaced text
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 668560] Re: Ligatures appear in monospaced text

2010-10-29 Thread Rob Speer
I've found a workaround, which is to switch to a font that does not
contain ligatures.

The font Mensch, which I was using, has single characters for
ligatures in it, and gedit was using them. Monospace does not, so its
text displays correctly.

-- 
Ligatures appear in monospaced text
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gedit in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 122295] Re: Notification Area doesn't work

2010-10-11 Thread Rob Speer
I encountered this problem.

On the Add to Panel menu, you can choose to add a notification area
to the panel, but it doesn't do anything except add some blank space
that makes the network icon move around in wonky ways. Instead, you have
to add indicator applet, which seems to do the same thing as the
notification area once did (it has the volume control and the messaging
icon in it, for example).

And neither of these are intuitive names when what you really want to
add is a volume control.

-- 
Notification Area doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122295
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 549975] [NEW] menus in notification area have inconsistent behavior

2010-03-27 Thread Rob Speer
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gnome-panel

Just a cosmetic bug: All of the icons in the upper-right notification
area have menus, but these menus are very inconsistent in their
behavior.

A nice feature of most menus in Ubuntu is that if you click one menu,
then mouse over the header of another one, that menu will open in its
place. This is a great UI for when you miss the correct menu by just a
bit. But in the notification area, you can only mouse from one menu to
another in limited groups, and some other behaviors are inconsistent as
well. Here's what I get:

* You can't mouse from the network notification to any other menu.
* You can mouse between the volume icon and the message icon, but no other 
menus from there.
* You can't mouse from the calendar to any other menu. In fact, unlike all 
other menus, you can even *click* another menu, and it won't close -- you'll 
have two menus open.
* You can mouse between the chat status menu and the power-down menu, but no 
other menus from there.

In addition, the highlighting behavior when these menus are clicked is
inconsistent. The network icon never gets highlighted even when its menu
is open. The time and date gets highlighted the moment you mouse over
it, gets highlighted in a _different_ color when you click it to open
the menu, and is highlighted in yet a different color when you open
another menu afterward.

Expected behavior: all the notification icons highlight when their menu
is open (and only when their menu is open), and you can move from one
menu to another by moving your mouse over a different notification icon.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: gnome-panel 1:2.29.92.1-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Mar 27 20:12:22 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta amd64 (20100318)
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-panel

** Affects: gnome-panel (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
menus in notification area have inconsistent behavior
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549975
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 549975] Re: menus in notification area have inconsistent behavior

2010-03-27 Thread Rob Speer

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42223067/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: GConfNonDefault.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42223068/GConfNonDefault.txt

-- 
menus in notification area have inconsistent behavior
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549975
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult

2010-03-25 Thread Rob Speer
Does an interface freeze really mean that an obvious bug in the
interface has to fester for six more months? Nobody's suggesting
changing what the interface looks like (well, not in *this* bug report),
just how it acts.

This is a *huge* problem in Ambiance now that the resize target is only
a single pixel out of thousands.

-- 
Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to metacity in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 536655] Re: Spell check in Empathy mishandles contractions and punctuation

2010-03-25 Thread Rob Speer
It's not exactly the same in gedit. gedit doesn't mark I'm as a
spelling error, for example.

-- 
Spell check in Empathy mishandles contractions and punctuation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 545424] Re: Spell-check underlines spaces when inserting text

2010-03-25 Thread Rob Speer
After the feedback at bug #536655, I checked whether this bug occurs in
other GTK programs such as gedit. It doesn't -- I can only produce this
bug in Empathy.

-- 
Spell-check underlines spaces when inserting text
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 536655] Re: Spell check in Empathy mishandles contractions and punctuation

2010-03-25 Thread Rob Speer
But it does seem like the same general bug. Do empathy and gedit use
different dictionaries?

-- 
Spell check in Empathy mishandles contractions and punctuation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 421212] Re: gdm ignores keyboard layout selection for variants

2010-03-25 Thread Rob Speer
I believe this bug has regressed.

I installed Lucid a few days ago, and my password worked correctly in
Dvorak. (I am one of three users of the system and the only one to use
Dvorak.)

After an update today, even though the keyboard layout selector says
Dvorak, it will not let me log in until I type my password in QWERTY.

-- 
gdm ignores keyboard layout selection for variants
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/421212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 545424] [NEW] Spell-check underlines spaces when inserting text

2010-03-23 Thread Rob Speer
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: empathy

The situation: I'm typing something in Empathy, and then I realize I
wanted to say something else before it, so I move my cursor back and
type some more.

When I do that, red underlines dance around on the words I'm currently
typing. In the end, every space character that I type ends up underlined
as a misspelling.

Steps to reproduce: in an Empathy window, type I'm typing a sentence
here first. Then move the cursor back to the beginning of the line and
type Now I'm typing a different sentence later. In addition to the m
of I'm being underlined (that's bug #536655), every space in Now I'm
typing a different sentence later is underlined.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Mar 23 16:31:01 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Beta amd64 (20100318)
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: empathy 2.29.92-0ubuntu2
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-17.26-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1
SourcePackage: empathy
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-17-generic x86_64

** Affects: empathy (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid

-- 
Spell-check underlines spaces when inserting text
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 545424] Re: Spell-check underlines spaces when inserting text

2010-03-23 Thread Rob Speer

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41769444/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Spell-check underlines spaces when inserting text
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 545424] Re: Spell-check underlines spaces when inserting text

2010-03-23 Thread Rob Speer

** Attachment added: A screenshot of the bug happening.
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41770456/empathy-underlines.png

-- 
Spell-check underlines spaces when inserting text
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545424
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 536655] Re: Spell check in Empathy mishandles contractions

2010-03-23 Thread Rob Speer
** Summary changed:

- Spell check in Empathy mishandles abbreviation
+ Spell check in Empathy mishandles contractions

** Summary changed:

- Spell check in Empathy mishandles contractions
+ Spell check in Empathy mishandles contractions and punctuation

-- 
Spell check in Empathy mishandles contractions and punctuation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 536655] Re: Spell check in Empathy mishandles contractions and punctuation

2010-03-23 Thread Rob Speer
This bug is happening to me too, and I can confirm that it's not
happening in other applications that use spell-check such as Tomboy
Notes or Firefox.

It would appear that, however Empathy interacts with the spell-checking
library, it's not tokenizing the words it sends correctly.

-- 
Spell check in Empathy mishandles contractions and punctuation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536655
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to empathy in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 445231] Re: mime.cache makes .pdf files show up as application/octet-stream; won't open in Evince

2009-10-07 Thread Rob Speer

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33207498/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33207499/XsessionErrors.txt

-- 
mime.cache makes .pdf files show up as application/octet-stream; won't open 
in Evince
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445231
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shared-mime-info in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 445231] [NEW] mime.cache makes .pdf files show up as application/octet-stream; won't open in Evince

2009-10-07 Thread Rob Speer
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: shared-mime-info

On today's Karmic Beta, I am unable to open .pdf files. Evince complains
that File type unknown (application/octet-stream) is not supported.

Evince bug #187225 says that this is a shared-mime-info problem, which
is why I'm reporting it here. That bug was closed after the reporter
discovered a workaround, but it is still a bug that prevents an
important use of the operating system for a very unintuitive reason.

The workaround is to delete ~/.local/share/mime/mime.cache, and that
worked for me as well. Perhaps an upgrade script for shared-mime-info
should do that.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed Oct  7 03:47:22 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: shared-mime-info 0.70-0ubuntu1
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-12.39-generic
SourcePackage: shared-mime-info
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-12-generic i686

** Affects: shared-mime-info (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
mime.cache makes .pdf files show up as application/octet-stream; won't open 
in Evince
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445231
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to shared-mime-info in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 278078] Re: The key repeat delay for the down-arrow, left-arrow, and End keys is longer than the other keys

2008-11-23 Thread Rob Speer
Bug 264196 seems to be describing the same issue, but over there they've
found a few workarounds! Here's the one that worked for me with the
least nasty side-effects:

Add this to the end of xorg.conf:

Section ServerFlags
Option AutoAddDevices off
EndSection

The downside is that any extra keys on your keyboard (such as
multimedia keys) won't work.

-- 
The key repeat delay for the down-arrow, left-arrow, and End keys is 
longer than the other keys
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278078
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs


[Bug 278078] Re: The key repeat delay for the down-arrow, left-arrow, and End keys is longer than the other keys

2008-11-22 Thread Rob Speer
Gah! I just upgraded to Intrepid and this happens to me too. Left and
down aren't much slower at repeating than the other keys, but all the
keys are quite slow. I can get at most about 6 keypresses per second.

By twiddling with the keyboard repeat controls, xset r rate, and (oddly enough) 
turning slow keys on and off in Accessibility, I can create all kinds of 
strange behaviors:
* xset r rate allows me to get very fast key repeats... but they happen in a 
spaced out rhythm. That is, I get 5 keypresses at once, then a 1/6 second or so 
pause, then 5 more keypresses, and so on.
* If I turn on slow keys in Accessibility (oddly enough), I get almost the 
behavior I want... except that left and down don't repeat _at all_, which is of 
course a dealbreaker.
* If I set the key repeat delay too low, I get the repeat rate I asked for... 
for about half a second. Then it slows down to 6 per second.
* If I use xset r rate and move the key repeat sliders anywhere in the Keyboard 
control panel, it goes back to the slow rate.

I assume from this behavior that there are two things competing for the
keyboard repeat rate.

-- 
The key repeat delay for the down-arrow, left-arrow, and End keys is 
longer than the other keys
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278078
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-settings-daemon in ubuntu.

-- 
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs