Re: [Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs

2008-12-24 Thread cwillu
@Robie Iirc, the gio pathway is unrelated to this bug: an sshfs mount is a 'local' mount (which is the root of the problem). Saving files to gnome sftp:// and smb:// file urls works fine (which is why some of us users stopped caring about this bug years ago :p). If that's correct, then it's com

[Bug 277243] Re: High load during audio playback

2008-10-19 Thread cwillu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 73744 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73744 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 73744 rhythmbox is slow! -- High load during audio playback https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277243 You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 284824] Re: 'alt+t' can't be set as keybinding for open-tab in gnome-terminal (worked in hardy)

2008-10-18 Thread cwillu
You can set it from intrepid, you just can't set it directly without going the the terminal 'keyboard shortcuts' menu. On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 11:48 AM, Mackenzie Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, so it works like this then: > > If set in Hardy then upgraded: > Action not performed > ^t inse

[Bug 284824] Re: 'alt+t' can't be set as keybinding for open-tab in gnome-terminal (worked in hardy)

2008-10-18 Thread cwillu
Under hardy, either via the gnome option 'Preferences | Appearances | Interface | Editable menu shortcut keys' + highlighting the 'new tab' option and hitting Alt+T, or 'Edit | Keyboard shortcuts'. It will then break after upgrading to intrepid. Under intrepid, only the 'Keyboard shortcuts' dialo

[Bug 284824] Re: 'alt+t' can't be set as keybinding for open-tab in gnome-terminal (worked in hardy)

2008-10-17 Thread cwillu
** Changed in: gnome-terminal (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- 'alt+t' can't be set as keybinding for open-tab in gnome-terminal (worked in hardy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/284824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subsc

Re: [Bug 284824] Re: 'alt+t' can't be set as keybinding for open-tab in gnome-terminal (worked in hardy)

2008-10-17 Thread cwillu
Edit menu | Keyboard Shortcuts | uncheck: "Enable menu access keys (such as alt+f to open the File menu)" In hardy, that's sufficient to get it to work, but it's broken on intrepid. On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:47 AM, Mackenzie Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying this, and I can't set it

[Bug 284824] [NEW] 'alt+t' can't be set as keybinding for open-tab in gnome-terminal (worked in hardy)

2008-10-17 Thread cwillu
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-terminal In hardy, I kept a alt+n and alt+t as 'new window' and 'new tab', as they're far easier to type than the default ctrl+shift+. The 'disable menu accelerators' option was disabled, and all was well in the world. In intrepid, you can still s

[Bug 159042] Re: Nautilus is very slow in list mode with assistive technologies enabled

2008-09-25 Thread cwillu
Still broken in intrepid. ** Summary changed: - Nautilus is very slow in list mode + Nautilus is very slow in list mode with assistive technologies enabled ** Description changed: - When I open a folder with many files for example '/usr/lib' Nautilus is very very slow in 'list display'. - It i

[Bug 187540] Re: Gnome-panel freeze when 8 windows are open when the panel is on the right

2008-06-30 Thread cwillu
The root cause seems to be that libwnck (the window list) is providing a size hint based on the desired width of the buttons * the number of columns (based on 25 characters visible), and gnome-panel using that hint to determine the vertical size of the switcher. The patch here still has issues wit

[Bug 43066] Re: Window list behaves bad when panel is vertical.

2008-06-30 Thread cwillu
This is a duplicate of 152838. The root cause is that libwnck (the window list) is providing a size hint based on the desired width of the buttons * the number of columns (based on 25 characters visible), and gnome-panel using that hint to determine the vertical size of the switcher. -- Window l

[Bug 187540] Re: Gnome-panel freeze when 8 windows are open when the panel is on the right

2008-06-30 Thread cwillu
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86382 is related as well, they have a half-working patch. -- Gnome-panel freeze when 8 windows are open when the panel is on the right https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/187540 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bug

[Bug 152838] Re: gnome window list panel item flickers in vertical orientation

2008-06-26 Thread cwillu
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86382 is the upstream bug (or rather, issues with the fixing of that bug caused this, discussed starting around comment #50.) -- gnome window list panel item flickers in vertical orientation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152838 You received this bug not

[Bug 152838] Re: gnome window list panel item flickers in vertical orientation

2008-06-26 Thread cwillu
Sebastien/Pedro, I can duplicate from a hardy live cd. The steps I listed above should be sufficient to duplicate, although make sure you have 'group windows' disabled, otherwise you have to open 7 distinct applications rather than 7 copies of (say) gnome-terminal. -- gnome window list panel ite

[Bug 152838] Re: gnome window list panel item flickers in vertical orientation

2008-01-21 Thread cwillu
I'm suspecting the problem is in libwnck rather than gnome-panel. -- gnome window list panel item flickers in vertical orientation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 152838] Re: gnome window list panel item flickers in vertical orientation

2008-01-21 Thread cwillu
** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- gnome window list panel item flickers in vertical orientation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152838 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bu

[Bug 152838] Re: gnome window list panel item flickers in vertical orientation

2008-01-21 Thread cwillu
I'm experiencing this issue on the following configurations: intel chipset with compiz running gutsy; different intel chipset with metacity under gutsy; radeon 9250 with metacity under gutsy, nvidia 73005GT with compiz and metacity under gutsy and hardy. Under feisty, the window list buttons dyna

[Bug 152838] Re: gnome window list panel item flickers in vertical orientation

2008-01-21 Thread cwillu
When 6 or fewer buttons are visible, the broken behaviour changes: the buttons switch between a normal consistent tab height, and what appears to be a height that dynamically changes to fill about a third of the taskbar (i.e., 4 buttons stretch to fill the space used by the 2 column layout mention

[Bug 152838] Re: gnome window list panel item flickers in vertical orientation

2008-01-21 Thread cwillu
I'm seeing the same issue with nvidia and radeon chipsets. Add new panel, setting the orientation to "Left" or "Right, the size to 100 pixels, and selecting "Expand". Add Window List applet (or drag original Window List applet to the new panel) Set properties on Window List to "Never group window

[Bug 24785] Re: page layout settings not respected in preview and printing

2007-12-15 Thread cwillu
Gedit and evince (on pdf's with landscape pages) both show this issue, on gutsy and feisty. -- page layout settings not respected in preview and printing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24785 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct sub

[Bug 119363] Re: setting portrait paper layout behaves incorrectly

2007-12-15 Thread cwillu
I'm seeing this in gutsy as well (gedit). I've had this happen with openoffice as well under feisty (haven't tried under gutsy yet). -- setting portrait paper layout behaves incorrectly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu D

[Bug 119363] Re: setting portrait paper layout behaves incorrectly

2007-12-15 Thread cwillu
Duplicate of bug 24785 I bet -- setting portrait paper layout behaves incorrectly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119363 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:

[Bug 158065] Re: evince crash on attached pdf when printing

2007-11-03 Thread cwillu
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- evince crash on attached pdf when printing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-

[Bug 158065] Re: evince crash on attached pdf when printing

2007-11-03 Thread cwillu
Pulling up a print preview on the entire document attached also triggers a segfault. I have another document that shows the same symptoms, which I can link if it's useful. -- evince crash on attached pdf when printing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158065 You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 158065] Re: evince crash on attached pdf when printing

2007-11-03 Thread cwillu
I think I'm having a similar issue. David, what happens if you try to print a small range of pages out of the document? I.e., the first 3 pages? -- evince crash on attached pdf when printing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/158065 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 151407] Re: Modified keyboard shortcuts not remembered

2007-10-10 Thread cwillu
I get the same behaviour out of other gnome applications, so it's not a gedit issue. ** Changed in: ubuntu Sourcepackagename: gedit => None -- Modified keyboard shortcuts not remembered https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu D

[Bug 151407] Re: Modified keyboard shortcuts not remembered

2007-10-10 Thread cwillu
Okay, it wasn't quite what I thought. If I close gedit normally, it works. It just happens that the only time I ever have it completely closed is after a power failure, remote disconnect (running it over ssh), or other similar circumstances. My bad. I would still expect the shortcuts to be save

[Bug 151407] Re: Modified keyboard shortcuts not remembered

2007-10-10 Thread cwillu
Fiesty and gutsy show the same behaviour (losing the preferences on an unclean shutdown of gedit), on fresh users. -- Modified keyboard shortcuts not remembered https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151407 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bu

[Bug 151407] Re: Modified keyboard shortcuts not remembered

2007-10-10 Thread cwillu
Close gedit completely, and reopen it; you should find that the keyboard shortcuts you set have all been reset. (incremental search -> alt+/, and go to line -> alt+c are the two I have set). This occurs with a fresh install of gutsy as well as my existing installs on other machines. -- Modifie

[Bug 151407] Modified keyboard shortcuts not remembered

2007-10-10 Thread cwillu
Public bug reported: Gnome has had the hidden preferences option to set keyboard shortcuts directly for some time now. The functionality allows you to set a keyboard shortcut by highlighting the menu item and pressing the key you would like associated with it. This behaviour is broken in gedit.

[Bug 81573] Re: file open fails on cifs mount with directio option set

2007-01-26 Thread cwillu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 34813 *** I don't think this is the same bug as #34813: this one only occurs with directio set on the mount, and only relates to being unable to open files. By contrast, 34813 refers to being unable to save edited files, which _were_ able to be opened perfectly

[Bug 81573] file open fails on cifs mount with directio option set

2007-01-25 Thread cwillu
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gedit Gedit fails on open files located on cifs mounts when mounted with the directio option. That particular option is used to disable caching on the mount so that legacy databases (i.e., dbase) can be accessed and modified without causing data corrupti