[Bug 690003] [NEW] gcalctool has no menu and 'Mode' does not work in netbook remix

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcalctool gcalctool has no menu, Ctrl-S does not work, and Alt-M does not bring up the menu. Essentially, only Mode Basic is available on netbook remix. Some posts in the forum stated the same, over time. On the normal Gnome desktop, it works okay.

[Bug 690003] Re: gcalctool has no menu and 'Mode' does not work in netbook remix

-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gcalctool in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690003 Title: gcalctool has no menu and 'Mode' does not work in netbook remix -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 579993] [NEW] My 'Computer' contains a number of fantasy partitions

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus After a fresh install, 'Computer' contains a large number of partitions of 21 GB each (I'll add a screenshot later). This is what the drive(s) actually have, though: $ sudo fdisk -l [sudo] password for udippel: Disk /dev/sda: 400.1 GB

[Bug 579993] Re: My 'Computer' contains a number of fantasy partitions

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48392631/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48392632/usr_lib_nautilus.txt -- My 'Computer' contains a number of fantasy partitions

[Bug 579993] Re: My 'Computer' contains a number of fantasy partitions

** Attachment added: The many partitions displayed by Nautilus http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48393393/Screenshot.png -- My 'Computer' contains a number of fantasy partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579993 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 304889] Re: Does not use system proxy settings

This *IS* already long, and winding, and partially boring. Let me nevertheless update the discussion to Lucid: No, System-Wide at Network Proxy Preferences does not set any proxy at all; at least I can't find any being used. It should apply to apt-get, as well as the Terminal Session (Gnome

[Bug 481172] [NEW] palimpsest increases harddisks beyond bounds

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-disk-utility The beauty of palimpsest is, that it creates storage space like there was no tomorrow. Just see my attached screenshot: A 640 GB WD disk unfolds an almost unreasonable number of partitions, that add up well beyond the 640 GB, only in

[Bug 481172] Re: palimpsest increases harddisks beyond bounds

Here is the sane fdisk: Disk /dev/sda: 640.1 GB, 640135028736 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 77825 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Disk identifier: 0x77de8e0f Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 39

[Bug 481172] Re: palimpsest increases harddisks beyond bounds

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35567206/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35567207/XsessionErrors.txt -- palimpsest increases harddisks beyond bounds https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481172 You

[Bug 466370] Re: mount behaves differently from Jaunty

What does this mean, please?: These are automatic mounts Firstly, the UUID-based one is not, because it requires and requires and re-requires me to enter the sudo password for it to mount. I can - if need be - probably work around this by chown-ing the /media/UUID to my name; though this is

[Bug 470393] Re: Brasero does not eject, nor offers to eject after burning

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34940762/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34940763/XsessionErrors.txt -- Brasero does not eject, nor offers to eject after burning

[Bug 470393] [NEW] Brasero does not eject, nor offers to eject after burning

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero Subject says it: Under Karmic - different to Jaunty - all my .iso I burn end up with brasero offering the alternatives 'Close' or 'Make another Copy' (or so). 'Close' is silly, because the tray IS closed and remains so. There is no 'eject' on

[Bug 465126] Re: Mounted FAT32/vfat shows as 0 after upgrade Jaunty to Karmic

Showing information for /org/freedesktop/DeviceKit/Disks/devices/sda native-path: /sys/devices/pci:00/:00:09.0/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/block/sda device: 8:0 device-file:

[Bug 465126] Re: Mounted FAT32/vfat shows as 0 after upgrade Jaunty to Karmic

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34701868/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34701869/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34701870/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment

[Bug 465126] [NEW] Mounted FAT32/vfat shows as 0 after upgrade Jaunty to Karmic

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus (Subject says it all) Immediately since and after upgrade Jaunty-Karmic, my partition sda11 shows as 0, while on Jaunty it would be the usual indication in GB. Here the fstab: $ sudo fdisk -l Disk /dev/sda: 640.1 GB, 640135028736 bytes 255

[Bug 80219] Re: [network-admin] wireless card will not associate if static ip is used in feisty

Yes, I can confirm this. An out-of-the-box install and update of Hardy was working perfectly well before I set WiFi to static. Then it started very slow, with around 10 seconds between each step logon-screen - sound - accepting password - displaying background - start panel. netstat -rn was