Re: [Bug 159042] Re: Nautilus is very slow in list mode with Assistive Technologies enabled (at-spi)
DLCBurggraaff It was set as invalid in Nautilus, because it is not a bug in Nautilus itself, but rather a bug within the accessibility (ATK) libraries. That is, this bug should manifest itself in other programs using GtkTreeView widgets and with accessibility turned on. This does not mean the bug will be neglected, only that the real cause has been determined more precisely. ECC --- On Wed, 29/7/09, DLCBurggraaff bu...@kabelfoon.nl wrote: From: DLCBurggraaff bu...@kabelfoon.nl Subject: [Bug 159042] Re: Nautilus is very slow in list mode with Assistive Technologies enabled (at-spi) To: eliudcabr...@yahoo.com Date: Wednesday, 29 July, 2009, 11:52 AM @Martin May: An explanation of the status: New - Invalid change would be appreciated. Regards, Dick -- Nautilus is very slow in list mode with Assistive Technologies enabled (at-spi) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159042 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Nautilus is very slow in list mode with Assistive Technologies enabled (at-spi) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 159042] Re: Nautilus is very slow in list mode with Assistive Technologies enabled (at-spi)
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #577098 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577098 ** Also affects: atk via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577098 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Nautilus is very slow in list mode with Assistive Technologies enabled (at-spi) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 364275] Re: Failed to print document / Too many failed attempts
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 359975 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 359975 evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts -- Failed to print document / Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 359975] evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts
Umang The solution you pointed out is far from complete. The blog post refers to Ubuntu 8.10. The new configuration file may be different. It seems more like bug #283811 The current bug seems to have (re-)appeared during the beta versions of Ubuntu 9.04. I suggest you let the developers track this problem in a better way. For reference, a forum thread is here http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=571 ECC --- On Sat, 6/6/09, Umang umang...@gmail.com wrote: From: Umang umang...@gmail.com Subject: [Bug 359975] Re: evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts To: eliudcabr...@yahoo.com Date: Saturday, 6 June, 2009, 3:53 PM Been happening to me very often recently. I somehow manage to avoid it by doing a Print Preview and printing from the preview window. But that is just irritating. There is a solution here: http://brainextender.blogspot.com/2009/01 /ubuntu-intrepid-too-many-failed.html Maybe it can be fixed along similar lines? Thanks, Umang -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of a duplicate bug. -- evince sometimes yield error Error printing: Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/359975 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Re: [Bug 364275] Re: Failed to print document / Too many failed attempts
Description: When trying to print a PDF document with evince sometimes a dialog appears with the message Failed to print document Too many attempts and the document doesn't print any page at all. While the messages Printing job..., Printing page... and Finishing... are displayed at the top of the page, the evince process consumes most CPU cycles. The bug doesn't show a consistent behavior in that sometimes the entire document may print fine, and other times it may fail to print a single page. The bug occurred with many different PDF documents, being 5 to 20 pages long, and 200 kB to 3 MB in size, but it also shows with smaller documents. These PDFs were generated with LaTeX: bug_evince_print_CMSS12_Type1.pdf (13 KB) bug_evince_print_NimbusSansL-Regu_Type1 (14.1 KB) bug_evince_print_Noname_Type3.pdf (17.9 KB) With PDFs having Type 1 fonts it doesn't seem to fail. With the other one it took half a minute and sometimes it would print, and sometimes it would display the Failed to print document dialog. The System Monitor shows heavy usage of gs (ghostscript) in this instance. The Manage Print Jobs application in Applications Accessories shows that those jobs with Type 1 fonts have a size comparable with the actual file size, that is, with the example documents provided, they are around 35 kB. With the Type 3 document the size was 4024 kB. Other documents I printed showed jobs as big as 8450 kB. I encountered this bug only while printing from evince. I tried printing from okular, and it never gave any problem. My printer: HP Laser Jet 1015 Ubuntu 9.04 texlive: 2007.dfsg.1-5 evince: 2.26.1-0ubuntu1 okular: 4:4.2.2-0ubuntu2 ** Attachment added: bug_evince_print_CMSS12_Type1.pdf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27566056/bug_evince_print_CMSS12_Type1.pdf ** Attachment added: bug_evince_print_NimbusSansL-Regu_Type1.pdf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27566058/bug_evince_print_NimbusSansL-Regu_Type1.pdf ** Attachment added: bug_evince_print_Noname_Type3.pdf http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27566059/bug_evince_print_Noname_Type3.pdf ** Attachment added: bug_evince_print.tex http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27566060/bug_evince_print.tex -- Failed to print document / Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 364275] Re: Failed to print document / Too many failed attempts
** Package changed: ubuntu = evince (Ubuntu) -- Failed to print document / Too many failed attempts https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364275 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 354995] Re: Brasero Checksum Error
emarkay About using growisofs instead of wodim, there seems to be some confusion from Pedro Villavicencio. Currently, Ubuntu 9.04, brasero (2.26.1-0ubuntu1) depends on wodim (1.1.9-1ubuntu1), and therefore is not possible to install brasero without it. Besides that, I believe brasero actually uses one or another program depending on the media used, CD or DVD, and the type of data being burned. I have logs that show that BraseroWodim is being used when burning a CD-RW, but BraseroGrowisofs when the media is DVD-RW. You can see the logs when running brasero in debug mode brasero -g I also believe that the problem may not be brasero itself, but may be with the underlying wodim, genisoimage, or other packages. I remember I had a similar problem with gnomebaker (0.6.4-1), which resulted in a fixation error like that of bug #234521 Therefore, in order to really troubleshoot this a lot of testing needs to be done. This is in fact the problem, because it means that you need to waste several blank CDs or DVDs if you want to exhaust all the possibilities and, of course, using rewritable (-RW) media is not enough. -- Brasero Checksum Error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 354995] Re: Brasero Checksum Error
I don't think a definite answer has been given. This errors still occurs. Or perhaps somebody can show that this is a duplicate to another bug? ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- Brasero Checksum Error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 354995] Re: Brasero Checksum Error
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #572840 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572840 ** Also affects: brasero via http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572840 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Brasero Checksum Error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354995 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 234521] Re: Brasero does not fixate DVDs properly
This seems related to bug #354995 Though the error messages slightly differ, it seems to only affect DVDs, and not CDs. The general description is that the burn seems successful up until the 99%, and then it gives some error. -- Brasero does not fixate DVDs properly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234521 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 327936] Re: Brasero always fails to record a DVD
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 234521 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234521 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 234521 Brasero does not fixate DVDs properly -- Brasero always fails to record a DVD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327936 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 314417] Re: Brasero 0.82: Burn Fail at 99%
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 234521 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234521 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 234521 Brasero does not fixate DVDs properly -- Brasero 0.82: Burn Fail at 99% https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314417 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 339098] Re: burn cd-r and rw discs but not dvd discs of any kind
The original poster reported this bug during the beta phase of Ubuntu 9.04. The final version didn't display the bug, and so it will be closed. ** Changed in: brasero (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- burn cd-r and rw discs but not dvd discs of any kind https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339098 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 373591] Re: Session error : Some files may be corrupted on the disc (brasero_burn_record burn.c:2599)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354995 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354995 It's very important to notice the correct Ubuntu release, and whether it is a beta version or the final release. In the original post it says Ubuntu 9.10, and then Ubuntu 8.14, which is rather confusing. The package version is also important. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 354995 Brasero Checksum Error -- Session error : Some files may be corrupted on the disc (brasero_burn_record burn.c:2599) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/373591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 372067] Re: U9.04:Brasero: DVD.iso md5sum is different with the source using H-L ODD.
Please look at bug #354995 There are several reports on DVDs showing errors. Some of them appear to be okay, while others appear to be corrupted. -- U9.04:Brasero: DVD.iso md5sum is different with the source using H-L ODD. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372067 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to brasero in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 316924] Re: Nautilus Loads Processor when there is an icons folder in the home directory
Well, I tried installing a few themes and I haven't been able to reproduce this bug. I installed the icon themes Amora-0.4.1.tar.gz SnowIsh-1.0.tar.gz (SVG) SnowIsh-1.0_PNG.tar.bz and the Gtk+ meta-theme SnowIsh-Theme.tar.gz I didn't want to attach the SnowIsh icon archives because of their sizes (6 MB and 9 MB), but they are found easily on the web. StewPedassle It seems weird to me that the bug is caused by files that are in the particular folder $HOME/Theme/Icons I suppose you created this folder to keep your downloaded themes organized. But I also suppose that you know that themes are installed either manually or automatically (through the Appearance Preferences interface in System Preference Appearance Install) by extracting the compressed archive in the $HOME/.icons and $HOME/.themes directories, for icons and themes respectively. That is, the $HOME/Theme/Icons folder should have no effect, it shouldn't be searched. Maybe it is searched by something else? An indexing service perhaps (trackerd)? A nautilus script? I don't know. What I may suggest is to list the contents of $HOME/.icons and $HOME/.themes just to know what other themes there are. Maybe one of these other themes is causing the problem. Then you may backup these directories and delete them. tar cvzf Themes-Backup.tar.gz $HOME/.icons $HOME/.themes rm -rf $HOME/.icons/* $HOME/.themes/* Then, without unpacking the tarballs, install the themes through the interface as mentioned above. 1. If all goes well, you can now use the themes, and you don't have to worry about unpacking anything in $HOME/Theme/Icons 2. Even if everything went well, you may unpack the archives in that folder and try to reproduce the bug. Then you can play with it and see if you can pinpoint the problem. Delete *.png files, leave the *.svg, etc. 3. You should get other people to reproduce this bug. Otherwise it can't be confirmed, and can't be called a real bug. Maybe it is something very specific to your current setup. 4. I suggest you try this on the newer Ubuntu 9.04. Chances are that this is magically solved by upgrading or by something silly like removing the $HOME/.icons folder and reinstalling the themes. -- Nautilus Loads Processor when there is an icons folder in the home directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 316924] Re: Nautilus Loads Processor when there is an icons folder in the home directory
The cause of the bug may be determined more accurately now. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- Nautilus Loads Processor when there is an icons folder in the home directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 316924] Re: Nautilus Loads Processor
StewPedassle It's good news that the probable cause of this bug has been determined! However, it is still a bug, you should not forget about that. Try placing the directory back where it was and confirm that the bug is reproducible every time. I hope you haven't completely obliterated those files from your system! It's specially important for others to be able to reproduce the bug. See if it only occurs with certain files, like *.png, *.svg, etc. You may attach the files that trigger this bug as a compressed archive, Themes.tar.gz, for instance. This information is valuable to determine if it's a duplicate of another bug, or if it's already know by the developers. ** Summary changed: - Nautilus Loads Processor + Nautilus Loads Processor when there is an icons folder in the home directory -- Nautilus Loads Processor when there is an icons folder in the home directory https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 66249] Re: listing a large folder very slow on vfat partition
This bug was reported a long time ago. Make sure it is sufficiently different from others. It appears to me it is just a duplicate of bug #159042, which is caused by Assistive Technologies. Try to reproduce this bug with Assistive Technologies turned off. -- listing a large folder very slow on vfat partition https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66249 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 159042] Re: Nautilus is very slow in list mode with assistive technologies enabled (at-spi)
** Summary changed: - Nautilus is very slow in list mode with assistive technologies enabled + Nautilus is very slow in list mode with assistive technologies enabled (at-spi) -- Nautilus is very slow in list mode with assistive technologies enabled (at-spi) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 66249] Re: listing a large folder very slow on vfat partition
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 159042 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159042 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 159042 Nautilus is very slow in list mode with assistive technologies enabled (at-spi) ** Summary changed: - listing a large folder very slow on vfat partition + listing a large folder very slow on vfat partition (actually any filesystem) -- listing a large folder very slow on vfat partition (actually any filesystem) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66249 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 230273] Re: (very) strange fix for slow change directory performance some people experience (could help find a fix?)
Please see if this is not a duplicate of bug #159042 Specifically, try to reproduce this bug with Assistive Technologies turned off. Also notice if you are using List View. -- (very) strange fix for slow change directory performance some people experience (could help find a fix?) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230273 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 247469] Re: nautilus loads the contents of a directory and sorts them at the same time makes it slow and unstable
Please see if this is not a duplicate of bug #159042 Specifically, try to reproduce this bug with Assistive Technologies turned off. It's not clear to me if the bug happens with List View or Compact View. -- nautilus loads the contents of a directory and sorts them at the same time makes it slow and unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247469 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 316924] Re: Nautilus Loads Processor
StewPedassle While reading your logs, it seems like you have some images in Themes/Icons/... located in your home folder. Please try removing those folders, and disabling the preview feature of nautilus. Since I cannot reproduce this bug, I don't know what else to suggest. Try reproducing this bug in several conditions. Try the different views: list, compact, icon; disable and enable compiz; check for hidden files; check file names with special characters. Also check top or htop for any suspicious process. Are you running any KDE program that could conflict with nautilus? -- Nautilus Loads Processor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 159042] Re: Nautilus is very slow in list mode with Assistive Technologies enabled (at-spi)
** Summary changed: - Nautilus is very slow in list mode with assistive technologies enabled (at-spi) + Nautilus is very slow in list mode with Assistive Technologies enabled (at-spi) ** Description changed: - When I open a folder with many files (for example '/usr/lib') Nautilus - is very very slow in 'list display' if Assistive Technologies is - enabled. + When I open a folder with many files (for example '/usr/lib', + '/usr/bin') Nautilus is very very slow in 'List View' if Assistive + Technologies is enabled. Disabling Assistive Technologies via the preferences dialog restores - performance (opening a large folder takes a second or two rather than 30 - seconds or more). + performance: opening a large folder takes a second or two rather than 30 + seconds or more. ** Tags added: a11y at-spi atk gail gailtreeview gtktreeview listview nautilus -- Nautilus is very slow in list mode with Assistive Technologies enabled (at-spi) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 316924] Re: Nautilus Loads Processor
StewPedassle It seems to me that while you are in the debugger you hit Ctrl+C after nautilus has finished hogging your system. This is not good because it gives the backtrace of a sleeping process, which is not interesting. You should interrupt nautilus while it is actively using the CPU. I suggest running the debugger several times; each time you hit Ctrl+C nautilus will be stopped at a different time and different backtraces will be obtained. You can even do this in a single gdb run. Instead of quiting gdb, continue and repeat the interrupting and backtrace. (gdb) continue Ctrl+C again (gdb) backtrace full ... etc. -- Nautilus Loads Processor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 159042] Backtraces
This is related to bug #267051. You can tell by the upstream bug report. A similar Debian bug report is here http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506715 Note how the at-spi-registryd process appears next to nautilus. I'm attaching 3 gdb backtraces. To obtain these: 1. Install debug packages nautilus-dbg, libgtk2.0-0-dbg, libglib2.0-0-dbg, libatk1.0-dbg. 2. Completely close nautilus with nautilus --quit 3. Run the debugger gdb nautilus as described here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Backtrace 4. I try to open /usr/bin which is guaranteed to have at least 1500 files. 5. Nautilus will eventually load the directory, but you need to wait at least 2.5 minutes on a slow computer. The time increases with the number of files. 6. Interrupt the process in the terminal with Ctrl+C. You may do this while nautilus is still unresponsive; if you wait for it to finish loading the directory you won't have anything interesting in the backtrace. In the first backtrace the only library without symbols is /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so, which is included in the at-spi package, which also provides /usr/lib/at-spi/at-spi-registryd 7. To obtain the other two backtraces install the debug symbols for this library, which are found in libatspi-dbg 8. Briefly looking at the source code in gail/gailtreeview.c, iterate_thru_children() is a recursive function, and according to one backtrace it is called a gazillion times. 9. The other backtrace shows a different output. You can run gdb several times to get different outputs each time, depending on the moment you hit Ctrl+C. I tested this on a single core, AMD64 processor, running 32-bit Ubuntu 8.10. If you have a multicore machine, you'll see threads everywhere in the backtraces. 10. Running valgrind with nautilus takes a LOT of time to even start. It outputs several lines concerning python2.5 and python libraries, which I believe is totally unrelated to this bug. ECC ** Attachment added: gdb-nautilus-gtk2-glib2-atk1.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23340915/gdb-nautilus-gtk2-glib2-atk1.txt ** Attachment added: gdb-nautilus-gtk2-glib2-atk1-atspi-1.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23340916/gdb-nautilus-gtk2-glib2-atk1-atspi-1.txt ** Attachment added: gdb-nautilus-gtk2-glib2-atk1-atspi-2.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23340917/gdb-nautilus-gtk2-glib2-atk1-atspi-2.txt -- Nautilus is very slow in list mode with assistive technologies enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159042 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 299121] Re: Nautilus expands a subdirectory when shift-clicking on a file
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 295408 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295408 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 295408 nautilus expanding the first visible folder after using keyboard to select a file -- Nautilus expands a subdirectory when shift-clicking on a file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 316924] Re: Nautilus Loads Processor
StewPedassle Your backtraces contain absolutely no debug symbols. Please install at least nautilus-dbg, libgtk2.0-0-dbg, libglib2.0-0-dbg, libatk1.0-dbg, and libatspi-dbg, and run the debugger again. Make sure it is not the same as bug #159042, which is caused by the Assistive Technology Service Provider Interface, at-spi. -- Nautilus Loads Processor https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 294555] Re: with ubuntu8.10 the filebrowser Nautilus 2.24.1 is awfully slow.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 159042 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159042 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 292707 Nautilus is slow and CPU hungry over sftp ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 159042 Nautilus is very slow in list mode with assistive technologies enabled -- with ubuntu8.10 the filebrowser Nautilus 2.24.1 is awfully slow. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294555 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 292707] Re: Nautilus is slow and CPU hungry over sftp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 159042 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159042 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 159042 Nautilus is very slow in list mode with assistive technologies enabled -- Nautilus is slow and CPU hungry over sftp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292707 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
[Bug 320993] Re: clock applet don't have any locations for Canary Islands
E. Guerra: Thank you for clarifying the bug report. I see what you mean now. Can you please update the description of the bug? I tried what you said in Ubuntu 8.04. Basically the bug is this: 1. In Ubuntu 8.04 if you search for Canary or Tenerife you'll find the location for Canary Islands, including timezone, latitude and longitude. 2. In Ubuntu 8.10 you have to search manually and you will only find the timezone. It is somewhat like a regression, but it's really not a high-importance bug. Maybe the data files with the coordinates were incomplete or something. I don't think developers would care much about fixing it in 8.10, however you should try the next Ubuntu release, 9.04, and make sure this doesn't happen again. ** Changed in: gnome-panel (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: None = gnome-panel Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- clock applet don't have any locations for Canary Islands https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/320993 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-panel in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
