Fixed up stream:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695672
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #695672
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695672
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in
** Also affects: file-roller via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695672
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
This bug was fixed in the package file-roller - 3.6.3-1ubuntu4
---
file-roller (3.6.3-1ubuntu4) raring; urgency=low
* debian/patches/git_disable_libarchive_padding.patch: disable padding so
the files don't have a minimal size of 10240 bytes (lp: #1064117)
-- Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: file-roller
Status: Unknown = Fix Released
** Changed in: file-roller
Importance: Unknown = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
Also affects file-roller 3.6.3-1ubuntu3 in raring
** Tags added: file-roller quantal raring regression
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1064117
Title:
Extremly
workaround:
downgrade file-roller
http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/file-roller#pdownload
then lock the package with this command
echo file-roller hold | sudo dpkg --set-selections
also lock it in synaptic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs,
launchpad only allows 1 attachemt here is the other
** Attachment added: Archive made on ubuntu 10.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1064117/+attachment/3388158/+files/backlightx.tar.bz2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Does the same behavior occur with command-line tar? (I'm guessing it
will because file-roller is a front-end) If it does, please change the
package to tar.
** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
chad@Compaq-Presario-CQ60:~$ tar cjf ./back.tar.bz2 Desktop/backlightx
chad@Compaq-Presario-CQ60:~$ ls -l back*
-rw-rw-r-- 1 chad chad 864 Oct 8 20:34 back.tar.bz2
the file is 864byetes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
I did a couple of quick tests and it looks as though file roller is not
actually compressing the tar file, and it doesn't matter which
compression method is chosen. Not sure why it has this effect on your
files as the command works as expected for other files.
Steps to reproduce:
1) In Nautilus,
Should have added version information:
file-roller:
Installed: 3.6.0-0ubuntu3
Candidate: 3.6.0-0ubuntu3
Version table:
*** 3.6.0-0ubuntu3 0
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal/main amd64 Packages
tar:
Installed: 1.26-4ubuntu1
Candidate: 1.26-4ubuntu1
Version table:
seems it does compress it just sets a min size (sounds really dumb for a
compression app to do)
from http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2065402#4 :
here file-roller is 'compressing' but will never go below 10.2kB
So - a folder with a number of small files
43.6kB goes to 10.6kB
34kB
13 matches
Mail list logo
