[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-12-20 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-21 Thread murmel
verified again, it's the same file. no changes in between -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993244 Title: weird default applications behaviour To

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
hum, but /usr/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache text/calendar=org.gnome.Calendar.desktop; doesn't match the content of the /usr/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache file you attached earlier in the bug... did you attach the wrong file or do config changes in between? -- You received this bug

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-20 Thread murmel
$ for f in `strace -e openat gio mime text/calendar 2>&1 | grep mimeinfo.cache | grep -v ENOENT | sed 's/.*"\(.*\)".*/\1/'`; do echo $f; grep text/calendar $f; echo -e ''; done /usr/share/ubuntu/applications/mimeinfo.cache /usr/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
interesting since your cache has text/calendar=org.gnome.Calendar.desktop;org.gnome.Evolution.desktop; it also shows the issue is at the glib level and not in the settings could you share the output of that one? $ for f in `strace -e openat gio mime text/calendar 2>&1 | grep mimeinfo.cache |

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-20 Thread murmel
$ gio mime text/calendar Default application for “text/calendar”: org.gnome.Calendar.desktop Registered applications: org.gnome.Calendar.desktop Recommended applications: org.gnome.Calendar.desktop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
And what's the output of $ gio mime text/calendar ? ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-20 Thread murmel
no, otherwise I would have added it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993244 Title: weird default applications behaviour To manage notifications about

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
do you get any warning on the stdout/err? it's a bit of a weird issue... ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-20 Thread murmel
only Evolution right now -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993244 Title: weird default applications behaviour To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-20 Thread Sebastien Bacher
the cache has 'text/calendar=org.gnome.Calendar.desktop;org.gnome.Evolution.desktop;', what is settings listing as calendar options for you? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-19 Thread murmel
interestingly enough, just upgraded to kinetic, where some of the applications got removed from the list (chromium from browsers (only firefox is there), and in video only celluloid is shown. sudo update-desktop-database does not help. ** Attachment added: "mime.txt"

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-19 Thread murmel
sadly enough, I can't reproduce this in a VM, but for some reason I had this bug in 6 out of 8 installs (on actual hardware). So I guess I need to wait till I will have to reinstall or it was patched by accident -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-19 Thread Sebastien Bacher
so the calendar selector in setting doesn't list evolution or gnome- calendar in those cases? Are they listed if you right click on an ics file from nautilus? could you include your /usr/share/applications/mimeinfo.cache in that case and the log from the packages installation? does doing $ sudo

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-18 Thread murmel
I have a script which installs all the packages I need, which includes gnome-calendar and evolution. It always shows both when installing seperately. When installing both at the same time, it can (weirdly enough, this doesn't always happen) remove one or the other, including the mime type (which

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
could you give an example of calendar software which isn't listed by GNOME? The UI should just pick any installed .desktop, how they are installed and in which order shouldn't lead to different results -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 1993244] Re: weird default applications behaviour

2022-10-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your description didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively"