[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2009-04-27 Thread Sebastien Bacher
We are closing this bug report as it lacks the information, described in the previous comments, we need to investigate the problem further. However, please reopen it if you can give us the missing information and don't hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)

[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2009-03-29 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions: * Is this reproducible? * If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug? This will help us to find and resolve the problem. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu)

[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2009-03-28 Thread judycraig
** Also affects: gdm Importance: Undecided Status: New -- fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/29389 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a direct sub

[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2006-06-11 Thread Ralph Corderoy
Confirming as at least part of the original problem, grep on non- existant file, exists. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed -- fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager? https://launchpad.net/bugs/29389 -- desktop-bugs

[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2006-06-09 Thread Ralph Corderoy
gdm's postinst has code like DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER_FILE=/etc/X11/default-display-manager case "$1" in configure) if grep "/usr/bin/gdm" $DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER_FILE; then echo "/usr/sbin/gdm" > $DEFAULT_DISPLAY_MANAGER_FILE fi ;; esac which d

[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2006-06-09 Thread Ralph Corderoy
For reference, the text in 49134 was got on a fresh 6.06 desktop i386 install with a `apt-get upgrade'. -- fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager? https://launchpad.net/bugs/29389 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lis

[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2006-06-09 Thread Daniel Holbach
** Bug 49134 has been marked a duplicate of this bug -- fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager? https://launchpad.net/bugs/29389 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2006-04-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
"very few people working on them" -- fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager? https://launchpad.net/bugs/29389 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs

[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2006-04-18 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The issue is that we have thousands of bugs and very people working on them so we have to prioritize the work and don't usually spent hours trying to reproduce a bug if it's not a priority. Your issue seems to be local to your box (or we would have get other bugs about it) and easy to workaround

[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2006-04-05 Thread Zooko O'Whielacronx
I don't really know how to answer the question of "what version of Ubuntu". It was some combination of packages drawn from breezy and/or dapper during the dapper process. The version of the gdm package was 2.13.0.5-0ubuntu2. I kind of feel like you aren't trying very hard to investigate the pr

[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2006-04-05 Thread Zooko O'Whielacronx
Setting this back to "Unconfirmed" -- I hope that is okay. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Rejected => Unconfirmed -- fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager? https://launchpad.net/malone/bugs/29389 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs

[Bug 29389] Re: fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-display-manager?

2006-04-05 Thread Daniel Holbach
Your bug lacks information we would need to investigate further. We are now going to close the bug - please reopen if you have more information at hand. ** Changed in: gdm (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info => Rejected -- fails to install -- possibly due to implicit dependency on default-displ