[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2015-01-17 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
Quotting pitti from comment #2: We won't change the behaviour in udisks, there needs to be some default after all. Please completely remove dmask from the vfat/ntfs mount options, like fmask already is (absent). Patch available at LP #482501. I assume that dmask=0077 was added at some point

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2015-01-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: udisks (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2015-01-17 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2015-01-17 Thread Alkis Georgopoulos
P.S. completely removing dmask from the mount options and letting /media/username cover the permission issues, couples well with UDISKS_FILESYSTEM_SHARED, so that people that want USB drives to be shared across users, can just specify UDISKS_FILESYSTEM_SHARED=1 in udev for those drives. Then

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2013-06-27 Thread Vetinari
and a few months later, nothing... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453605 Title: Make default mount umasks configurable To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2012-10-25 Thread Jan
Really nothing changed for another year? Thats poor. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453605 Title: Make default mount umasks configurable To manage notifications

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2011-02-05 Thread Harry Sufehmi
Amazing that this old bug manages to exist through 2011. Anyway - I've googled around, and the only fix seems to be the one described on this post : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devicekit-disks/+bug/482501/comments/13 However, when I tried to install the source for devicekit-disks,

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2010-10-12 Thread Ivan Razumov
Any chance of this to be fixed in the non-geek way? It's 10.10 already, and this bug is still here! -- Make default mount umasks configurable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2010-09-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gvfs Importance: Unknown = Wishlist -- Make default mount umasks configurable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2010-06-18 Thread Dana Goyette
I'm marking this regression-release, because as commented on in the duplicate, we went from Jaunty (HAL) offering NTFS drives as 777 by default (I believe), with gconf options to change permissions, to Karmic (devkit-disks / udisks) offering no way to change permissions from 700 -- and thus no way

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2010-06-18 Thread Dana Goyette
Also, I tried to change Nautilus (linked to upstream bug tracker) to gvfs, and got: Internal Server Error NotImplementedError -- Make default mount umasks configurable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs,

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2010-06-18 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: gvfs Status: Unknown = New -- Make default mount umasks configurable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. -- desktop-bugs mailing list

Re: [Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2010-05-13 Thread Adrian Roman
I've tried the solution suggested above but when I stick the NTFS USB drive in, it says it can't mount it and point to this bit of documentation: Unprivileged block device mounts work only if all the below requirements are met: 1. ntfs-3g is compiled with integrated FUSE support 2. the

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2010-05-07 Thread X-Ander
I have added the following lines to my /etc/fstab: /dev/sdb1 /media/usbd1 auto noauto,rw,user,shortname=mixed,dmask=02,fmask=0113,utf8=1,flush 0 2 /dev/sdc1 /media/usbd2 auto noauto,rw,user,shortname=mixed,dmask=02,fmask=0113,utf8=1,flush 0 2 Now two USB flash drives are mounted as I want. I

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2010-02-15 Thread Martin Pitt
BTW, in lucid, VFAT drives are mounted with umask 077 again, as in Jaunty. ** Description changed: - Binary package hint: devicekit-disks - - Greetings! - - After upgrading from 9.04 to 9.10, mounting removable USB media (e.g. a - thumbdrive) from Nautilus defaults the umask/fmask such that

[Bug 453605] Re: Make default mount umasks configurable

2010-02-15 Thread Ryan Tucker
A configuration option would be excellent. Thanks for looking into this! :-) -- Make default mount umasks configurable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in ubuntu. --