*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17294 ***
I'm not sure that closed duplicate bug is the best place to talk about
that, maybe you could mail the artwork list about that?
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lis
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17294 ***
I found this bug where OK/cancel icons were proposed:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/tangerine-icon-
theme/+bug/40607
And these are the icons:
http://ramnet.se/~nisse/diverse/temp/tango/okncancel.tar.gz
Surely the proposed red cross's
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17294 ***
** Also affects: tangerine-icon-theme (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
** Also affects: tango-icon-theme (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://laun
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17294 ***
Just open Tango and Tangerine tasks on this bug.
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17294 ***
Guess we should file some bugs on tango and tangerine, right?
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-b
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17294 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 17294
The Apply-icon used in for example Synpatic an Liferea is low quality
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@list
I only marked human-icon-theme as "fix released". That's something the
maintainers of those packages have to decide.
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/
so tango and tangerine will still show the ugly-looking icons? :-(
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
human-icon-theme (0.3-0ubuntu1) edgy; urgency=low
* New upstream release:
- added icons.
- add gtk-apply and gtk-ok (fixes part of Malone: #60424)
- added Eject icon (Malone: #59662)
- reload icon in 24x24 (Malone: #47268)
-- Daniel Holbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 22 Sep 2006
"David: they were removed because they don't really belong in that
package and I was unsure about the metaphors."
Right, I understand the part about it not belonging there. I'm unsure
however, about a pretty greeen tick's metaphor being different to a an
ugly green tick's.
"Hopefully the iconfact
mpt: ok, I trust you on this.
David: they were removed because they don't really belong in that
package and I was unsure about the metaphors. Hopefully the iconfactory-
dude will fix these in human-icon-theme, as they seem to be priority 10
in http://daniel.holba.ch/ubuntu/ic . I want to keep tang
Additionally, If the problem is only with the OK and cancel buttons, why
has the tick icon been removed too? I mean, why does the liferea menu
have to look this bad?
http://img221.imageshack.us/img221/8201/pantallazolifereatq6.png
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net
Hang on, the premise is wrong here. The HIGs can be a bit confusing in
some places, but nowhere do they say that "OK" and "Cancel" should be
abolished! It's true that "OK" should be replaced by more informative
text, if possible, in dialogs and in confirmation alerts. But "OK"
*must* be the text of
Should we file similar bugs for tango-icon-theme and tangerine-icon-
theme then?
I don't use human anyway, so it wouldn't be of much use to me having
this fixed in human.
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@list
Moving this to human-icon-theme, as the reporter used that theme and
because human is the default.
** Changed in: tango-icon-theme-common (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: tango-icon-theme-common => human-icon-theme
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desk
Andreas Nilsson schrieb:
> Actually it was inconsistent before as well, as Ubuntu use the Human
> icon set by default and Human don't have these icons, so it used to fall
> back on the icons provided by tango-common.
That may well be. But for the artwork layman such as me that did not
stand out in
Actually it was inconsistent before as well, as Ubuntu use the Human
icon set by default and Human don't have these icons, so it used to fall
back on the icons provided by tango-common.
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
des
towolf wrote:
>> I also really don't think that forcing ugly icons on people is the right
>> way to get them to change their dialogs.
> That’s exactly the line of thought, unfortunately.
> This is what Rodney, the g-i-t and icon-naming-utils maintainer said about
> the issue:
> [cut]
> Also, the
On Fri, 15 Sep 2006 14:26:12 +0200, Mika Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I also really don't think that forcing ugly icons on people is the right
> way to get them to change their dialogs. That will take a long time and
> might not even be possible at all. For instance all my wxWidgets apps
"These are all valid points. What I care about is what the final release
will look like. I think after all the effort that's being put into the
artwork to provide a consistent-looking release, it would really ruin
the whole thing if edgy were to ship with those ugly icons".
I agree 100%. I'm not s
These are all valid points. What I care about is what the final release will
look like. I think after all the effort that's being put into the artwork to
provide a consistent-looking release, it would really ruin the whole thing if
edgy were to ship with those ugly icons. I mean the OK-icon (stu
Fair enough, really.
Just one point about the default action. In many GTK themes the style for the
default button is not really salient (check Clearlooks to see; it is salient in
the Human theme, though). An affirmative/negative icon would help the user
click one button, IMO.
--
GTK default ic
I agree that it's a bit silly to belive that every app is going to conform to
the HIG about button labeling, but I think our approach should be to try to
clean them out where we can. I'm going to file a bug against gnome-app-install
right away. Anyone want to help tracking it down in other appli
As an addendum:
What I proposed is similar to the strategy currently implemented for
MIME-types. There’s a generic "image" MIME-type icon that subsumes all
sub-types of images until all those myriads of image types can be provides by
special icons.
I propose to add a generic "do action" icon tha
I agree, but it will probably never happen that all apps finally conform to
what the HIG recommends about buttons. The other point is that the icons
transport a sense of benign-ness of the actions and facilitate the decision of
the user when he is presented a binary choice, for example. So, gree
We decided to remove the dialog-* since we had to many complains about them,
especially the dialog-cancel icon. I put them in tango-common because I was
curious about the effect of these somewhat unorthodox metaphors, but they were
not really popular.
I hope these actions can be placed in tango-
Yes, we definitely need them back. My eyes are about ready to burn out
from the old icons.
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Sorry, I didn't post the image to compare:
http://img62.imageshack.us/img62/839/pantallazopreferenciaswk9.png
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/deskto
Please put those icons back at least until you come up with something
better, the current ones make the Child Jesus cry.
http://www.imageshack.us/
Seriously, you think that's acceptable? Please give me a break!
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
de
I think Andreas once had a nice non-official "gtk-apply" checkmark that was
curved somehow. It would be good if one of the three main Tango/g-i-t
contributors would whip something up for the remaining stock/gtk-* icons. After
all those are shown on almost every dialog window. The ones that were
Right, there were icons in tango-common, which were removed, because
Andreas was not happy with them, I subscribe him again, so we can get
his input on it.
** Changed in: tango-icon-theme-common (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged => Wishlist
Status: Unconfirmed => Confirmed
--
GTK default
** Attachment added: "Screenshot showing the problem"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/4272053/gtk-default-buttons.jpg
--
GTK default icons used in several places
https://launchpad.net/bugs/60424
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listi
32 matches
Mail list logo