Sorry for reporting then, but as far as I am aware and unless my english
is very bad (this might be true) according to the link that you posted
the GNU foundation explicitly tells developers to add the well known:
--
one line to give the program's name and an idea of what it
I understand why you would think this to be the case and I wonder myself
why they didn't add more. Since this is more of a question than a bug I
am going to move it to the Questions area. Feel free to follow up on it
in there and see if you get an answer to this. I will do the same as I
am
** Attachment added: Image showing were the text is missing
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/656628/+attachment/1678141/+files/screenshot.png
--
[Maverick] License text missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656628
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
The license is not missing it is there. GPLv2+ is the correct license.
(General Public License)
You can verify it at the following site
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html
** Changed in: gnome-system-monitor (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
[Maverick] License text missing
