to drop xulrunner from main
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/740815/+subscriptions
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/740815/+subscriptions
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug
notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug
://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/740815/+subscriptions
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/desktop-bugs
. comments 43 - 46 in bug 740815
explain the current implementation though
I'm investigating a seed workaround.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title
I've tried, and I don't think I can fix this in a seed. Either we have
to ignore the noise from component-mismatches until such time as
xulrunner-dev is removed entirely (which is error-prone), or we need to
flip round the build-depends ordering as an Ubuntu-specific patch to
packagekit.
--
You
FWIW, libreoffice and libreoffice-l10n also have xulrunner-dev |
firefox-dev. I wonder why they do not show up in the component-
mismatches.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
This bug was fixed in the package libreoffice-l10n - 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu3
---
libreoffice-l10n (1:3.3.2-1ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low
* merged all changes from ubuntu-natty-3.3.1 up to 3.3.2-1ubuntu3
libreoffice (1:3.3.2-1ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low
* make build dep on xulrunner-dev
I reapplied the icedtea-web fix this morning, Bjoern uploaded libo-l10n,
so we should be all set now. I demoted xulrunner-2.0 to universe.
** Changed in: xulrunner-2.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
This bug was fixed in the package libreoffice - 1:3.3.2-1ubuntu3
---
libreoffice (1:3.3.2-1ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low
* make build dep on xulrunner-dev alternatively depend on firefox-dep (LP:
#740815)
* cherry-pick from debian:
- enable is (icelandic) l10n (LP: #751746)
** Branch linked: lp:~ubuntu-desktop/gnome-python-extras/ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/gnome-python-extras
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
--
The only gluezilla reverse dependency is a recommends from libmono-
webbrowser0.5-cil, which will be dropped to a suggests.
I demoted gluezilla.
** Changed in: gluezilla (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Now that gluezilla is in universe, I demoted xulrunner-1.9.2 as the last
remaining rdepends.
** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None = ubuntu-11.04
--
You received this bug notification because
This bug was fixed in the package mono - 2.6.7-5ubuntu3
---
mono (2.6.7-5ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low
* Drop gluezilla Recommends to Suggests for libmono-webbrowser0.5-cil.
xulrunner, and hence gluezilla, is dropping out of main for Natty.
(LP: #740815)
-- Christopher James
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/mono
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
--
desktop-bugs
yes. that works fine
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
--
desktop-bugs mailing list
Thanks - I'll be sure to roll that into the next release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner
@Wesley the symlinks are created in the wrong way.
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2011-04-09 10:55 usr/lib/libmozjs185.so.1.0 -
/build/pkg//usr/lib/libmozjs185.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx root/root 0 2011-04-09 10:55 usr/lib/libmozjs185.so -
/build/pkg//usr/lib/libmozjs185.so.1.0
-rwxr-xr-x
Ionut;
I think you did
# ./configure --prefix=/build/pkg/usr/
# make make install
and then wanted to move/copy the links that were made, but they were
absolute rather than relative links, so this did not work?
If I understand correctly, I can fix this in the next release, or
perhaps a point
Wesley:
i did ./configure --prefix=/usr make make DESTDIR=/build/pkg
install
in Makefile.in you have on line:
891 ln -s $(SHLIB_EXACT_VER) $(SHLIB_ABI_VER)
892 ln -s $(SHLIB_ABI_VER) $(SHLIB_ANY_VER)
where:
870 # Generic Unix / Linux
871 SHLIB_ANY_VER :=
Interesting, that is not a configuration I've tested but I will add it
to my (very short) list for the next release.
In the meantime, I think you can change 891 and 892 of Makefile.in like
this to achieve the desired outcome:
891 ln -s $(notdir $(SHLIB_EXACT_VER)) $(SHLIB_ABI_VER)
892
Just discussed on IRC, we'll drop the webbrowser package from mono for
now, and will reintroduce it once the webkit port is ready.
** Changed in: mono (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris Halse Rogers (raof)
** Changed in: mono (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in:
Fix for libreoffice and libreoffice-l10n commited as:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-
openoffice/libreoffice.git;a=commit;h=fa30810e24fa95e212a643a4722a5aec6b040335
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Assignee:
** Changed in: libreoffice-l10n (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
This bug was fixed in the package packagekit - 0.6.11-2ubuntu3
---
packagekit (0.6.11-2ubuntu3) natty; urgency=low
* Build-depend on xulrunner-dev or firefox-dev, which makes it
possible to compile PK without xulrunner as the
latter should go away. (LP: #740815)
--
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/packagekit
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
--
Interested in this aswell for OpenBSD, i was planning to do an update to
our old spidermonkey 1.7.0 port from firefox 4 source tarball until i
saw that bug report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in
We officially published last night --
http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/js/js185-1.0.0.tar.gz
https://developer.mozilla.org/En/SpiderMonkey/1.8.5
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
(In reply to comment #23)
Normal practice is to only ship generated files in the foo.tar.gz, not in
revision control. In the same way that firefox-4.0.source.tar.bz2 includes
configure, but mozilla-central doesn't.
We used to have it in the tree when we were in CVS, and it's only the
more
** Changed in: firefox
Status: In Progress = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop
** Changed in: icedtea-web (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe]
This bug was fixed in the package icedtea-web - 1.1~20110320-0ubuntu2
---
icedtea-web (1.1~20110320-0ubuntu2) natty; urgency=low
* Switch build-depends to firefox-dev for natty. xulrunner is
being demoted from main (LP: #740815)
- update debian/rules
- update
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/icedtea-web
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
--
GJS changes to support this release:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646369
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #646369
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646369
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe]
Hi Wes, thanks a ton for your work here!
* You seem to have configure checked in to the hg repo, since it's
generated it shouldn't be (and it's not in mozilla-central)
Actually I'm getting a build error on RHEL6 I need to debug before I do
further checking.
--
You received this bug
Colin -- I checked in configure in purpose - it's part of the source
tarball (which is what that repo tracks). The idea is to eliminate
autoconf-2.13 as a dependency for projects embedding SpiderMonkey and
building from (or incorporating) the source tarball.
--
You received this bug
A couple more things:
* The js-config script will conflict. Not quite sure what to do with it; most
distros ship pkg-config, which is really better in all conceivable ways.
* Speaking of pkg-config, this does *not* ship a .pc file (it lives in
mozilla-central/xulrunner/installer). Would you
(In reply to comment #21)
Would you take a patch to add one, say
spidermonkey-185.pc?
Can you add this to the tracemonkey repo too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
(In reply to comment #20)
Colin -- I checked in configure in purpose - it's part of the source tarball
(which is what that repo tracks). The idea is to eliminate autoconf-2.13 as a
dependency for projects embedding SpiderMonkey and building from (or
incorporating) the source tarball.
Normal
I've actually packaged this in Ubuntu now, but I hit a couple of
unexpected issues:
1) js-config --libs doesn't return the right linker flags (-lmozjs)
2) Even though it builds an ABI versioned so, the soname of the
resulting ELF binary is still unversioned (ie, libmozjs185.so rather
than
Created attachment 521592
Fix js-config --libs
This makes js-config --libs return the right linker flags
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
Created attachment 521593
Fix SONAME
This ensures that the resulting binary has the right soname
(libmozjs185.so.1.0). tbh, I couldn't figure out a better way of doing
this, so I'm not sure if anyone else has any better ideas
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
If you're doing official releases, you also want to address bug 554088
at some point.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to
(In reply to comment #26)
Created attachment 521593 [details]
Fix SONAME
This ensures that the resulting binary has the right soname
(libmozjs185.so.1.0). tbh, I couldn't figure out a better way of doing this,
so
I'm not sure if anyone else has any better ideas
Why does it need to be
Chris -- argh, thanks for catching the js-config bug. I'll be cutting a
new release to address that specific issue RSN.
Thanks also for your SONAME patch: that's something I don't have a lot
of experience with.
Mike -- I named the library libmozjs185.so rather than libmozjs.so
specifically
(Apologies if this is bikeshedding or a repeat of previous discussion)
(In reply to comment #29)
Mike -- I named the library libmozjs185.so rather than libmozjs.so
specifically
because it doesn't work as a drop-in for any previously-released libmozjs.so
(not even close -- see the release
Created attachment 521641
add pkg-config file
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
--
(In reply to comment #30)
Since we're deliberately changing the name, maybe libspidermonkey is a better
name? I agree that putting 185 in the name isn't good. When we change to
1.9.0,
would we have to change the SO name? That can't be right.
I don't think it matters a lot, honestly. I
(In reply to comment #31)
Created attachment 521641 [details]
add pkg-config file
We probably don't care, but you can make the pkg-config file
relative/relocatable by using the ${pcfiledir} expansion: see
https://github.com/Flusspferd/flusspferd/blob/master/libflusspferd/flusspferd.pc.in
(@
I believe that the 1.8.5 numbering scheme is a pretty bad one, and is only
there because of history. Perhaps we should change it; maybe to the Firefox
version number or the Gecko one.
So combining, you're proposing libspidermonkey-4.so ?
As someone else mentioned, there is also the
(In reply to comment #30)
(Apologies if this is bikeshedding or a repeat of previous discussion)
(Well-aimed kick to the shins)
I don't think anything has changed since comment 5. See the last three
paragraphs there.
Since we're deliberately changing the name, maybe libspidermonkey is a
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/tuxguitar
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/azureus
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/mozjs
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
--
desktop-bugs
This bug was fixed in the package couchdb - 1.0.1-0ubuntu14
---
couchdb (1.0.1-0ubuntu14) natty; urgency=low
* Build against a proper libmozjs \o/
- FFe LP: #740815
* Note, we rename a couple of existing patches so that they apply in the
right order and the names make
** Patch added: Patch against PackageKit package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-2.0/+bug/740815/+attachment/1936588/+files/packagekit_0.6.11-2ubuntu2.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
Thanks Matthias! Taking for sponsoring.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to drop xulrunner from main
--
Matthias,
unfortunately this doesn't work:
dh_install --list-missing
cp: Aufruf von stat für
„debian/tmp/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/packagekit-plugin.so“ nicht möglich: Datei
oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden
dh_install: cp -a debian/tmp/usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/packagekit-plugin.so
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/iriverter
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/couchdb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us to
I've just pushed
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-4.0.head/revision/822
, which means that firefox-dev will provide a mozilla-plugin pkgconfig
file now (but I'm not sure I should upload this until after beta now).
In any case, the only open items are browser plugins, which
Thanks Chris, this would also help to make the mozvoikko changes a lot
easier. So keeping Matthias' patch in the pipe until the new firefox
lands.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
@Martin Pitt: Thanks! I could change this dependency upstream... I'll take a
look how this is handled in Iceweasel and Firefox on other distributions and
then maybe change it, if the name is the same everywhere. (But I don't really
think this will be the case...)
I accidentally build PK in my
Okay, the mozilla-plugin file is necessary, cause it's named differently
everywhere. Chris' changes will solve this without much noise :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
One remaining rdep for 1.9.2:
-- natty/main amd64 deps on xulrunner-1.9.2:
libgluezilla
-- natty/main amd64 deps on libgluezilla:
libmono-webbrowser0.5-cil
-- natty/main amd64 deps on libmono-webbrowser0.5-cil:
libmono-cil-dev
libmono-winforms2.0-cil
** Also affects: gluezilla (Ubuntu)
As we can't really do something about gluezilla itself, I add a mono
task. There is reportedly some work going on to implement the WebBrowser
widget with webkit-sharp, but it's not ready yet.
If we would disable xulrunner in mono, we would not have any regression
in the Ubuntu archive (as
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to enable us
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xulrunner-2.0
Based on the new Firefox release schedule
(http://people.mozilla.com/~sayrer/2011/temp/process.html), we need to
drop xulrunner from main as unsupportable, else I'm going to risk
spending nearly 100% of my time continually providing support
Note, I'm struggling with swt-gtk at the moment. I've got it built, but
everything using webkit crashes inside soup_session_get_feature. I've
islolated it down to a pointer returned from webkit_get_default_session
losing its upper 32-bits somewhere (I'm testing this on a 64-bit
machine).
This is
Note, the only thing keeping gnome-python-extras in main is gwibber,
which uses python-gtkspell
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe]
As for g-p-e: It's obsolete anyway, as next cycle when we switch to
GTK3, stuff needs to be ported to PyGI. The gtkspell API is tiny, so
building a gir for that should be easy. However, as it is tightly
integrated into Gtk.TextView, we can't mix it with gwibber as long as
that isn't ported to
First, thanks for the analysis. With Firefox' even more rapid release
cycles I agree that it is worthwhile minimizing the xulrunner
dependencies. I'll comment about/review the tasks individually.
Splitting the gnome-python-extras package is fine for natty. It will not
effectively change any code
gtk-vnc and packagekit are unintrusive as well, they just need to switch
to firefox-dev for getting the NPAPI headers (which sounds better than
having to copy them around). This is a very stable API, so shouldn't
cause any porting issues (and if it ever breaks, we would have the same
issue with
** Changed in: swt-gtk (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: swt-gtk (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in
swt-gtk is already well underway, it's only one bug which keeps us from
switching as far as I understood. This is a hugely complex package which
is basically impossible for us to port to various xulrunner versions, so
we don't have much of a choice here anyway in terms of manpower and
knowledge.
Switching mozvoikko to firefox-dev is actually the correct thing to do
indeed, so it's a bug fix to move it from xulrunner-dev.
** Changed in: mozvoikko (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #628723
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628723
**
Dropping xulrunner-1.9.2 from main trivially approved. I'd even go as
far as calling this a release blocker, as this is obsolete and
unmaintained code with known open security issues.
** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: xulrunner-1.9.2 (Ubuntu)
Once the rdepends are fixed, dropping xulrunner-2.0 is fine. This will
even happen automatically as part of regular archive admin cleanup, and
it doesn't need an explicit FFE.
** Changed in: xulrunner-2.0 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: xulrunner-2.0 (Ubuntu)
@Chris: Do you have an updated swt-gtk in a PPA or branch, that you
commented above you are testing?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe]
Dave - not just yet, I'm trying to figure out the issue in comment #1
(which I think I've nailed now). I'll create a PPA for us to handle the
transition in and test everything. I guess you'll want to test gwt/euca
too?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Note that turning on -Wall in swt-gtk exposed the error causing my
problem in comment #1:
cc -Wall -DSWT_VERSION=3659 -DLINUX -DGTK -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include
-I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include/linux -fPIC -DJNI64 `pkg-config --cflags
gtk+-2.0 webkit-1.0` -c webkitgtk.c -o webkit.o
@Chris, Yes... would like to test it against eucalyptus - but the reason
this area hasn't had as much progress as i had hoped is eucalyptus is
/still/ non-functional on Natty. I'm going to raise comment #12 with
James Page, as he might have a good idea. If you have a branch or patch
with the
Ok, I'm going to stage everything in
https://launchpad.net/~chrisccoulson/+archive/xulrunner-universe-
transition. I will upload swt-gtk to there shortly
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
eclipse-rcp depends on libswt-gtk-3.5-jni, but isn't eclipse shipping
its own copy of swt? Benjamin?
I've uploaded the new swt-gtk to my PPA now, and just working through
its rdepends
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
eclipse-rcp ships its own copy of swt and doesn't depend on libswt-
gtk-3.5-jni (just contains a replaces).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
Ah, excellent. Thanks! (I was mislead by the output of apt-cache
rdepends)
Ok, I've completed the swt-gtk transition in my PPA now
** Changed in: swt-gtk (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress = Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which
Ok, I've completed the swt-gtk transition in my PPA now
How about dropping it completely? Community support of Mozilla products
always seems problematic and so if we can get rid of it completely, that would
be super useful.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: packagekit (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Matthias Klumpp (ximion)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
[FFe] Updates to
Scott - the swt-gtk transition drops the mozilla support entirely (it
enables the webkit backend instead)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
** Changed in: couchdb (Ubuntu)
Status: New = In Progress
** Changed in: couchdb (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Chris Coulson (chrisccoulson)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 09:00:00 am you wrote:
Scott - the swt-gtk transition drops the mozilla support entirely (it
enables the webkit backend instead)
That's good, but what about the other xulrunner rdepends?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
That's a different story altogether. I wouldn't object to dropping
xulrunner from the archive (and other consumers of it too), but I
wouldn't want to be the person that made that decision :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
Chris: Would you be up for doing the analysis to see what packages would need
to be ported or dropped?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
Scott - sure, no problem. A good starting point is
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Natty/Firefox4/XULRunner20Transition
, which I've been using to track some of this work in natty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed
.1.0.0? I think this would
help the distro use-case, and make it possible to ship bug fixes on top
of JS-1.8.5-the-language -- while properly advertising API/ABI
compatibility. And, of course, making room for JS-1.8.6-the-language.
Reply at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/740815/comments/0
Solving this in PackageKit is a bit difficult: Ubuntu and Debian share the same
packaging, which is nice cause it's easy to maintain. Cause Debian has no
Firefox, I cannot simply depend on firefox-dev without breaking Debian
compatibility.
I'll wait for a nice solution (package NPAPI headers
** Changed in: gnome-python-extras (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: gnome-python-extras (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Martin Pitt (pitti)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to
@Matthias Klumpp
Why not build depend on firefox-dev | xulrunner-dev (assuming this works in
Debian)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
@Matthias Klumpp
Why not build depend on firefox-dev | xulrunner-dev (assuming this works in
Debian)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-python-extras in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/740815
Title:
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
