[Expired for evince (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
One detail that I just noticed is that while downgrading allows to save
form content again and to display it properly, there remains one
(presumably font-related issue): the checkmarks in checkboxes (e.g.
check all the following cases that apply) appear as boxes indicating a
missing glyph in the fo
Correction. Downgrading as above does restore normal operation. However,
it required re-editing the document content:
After clicking on the field, cutting its content away, closing the
field, pasting the content back in, saving the document and re-opening
it, the content displays as expected.
--
'whohas' revealed some interesting packaging issues in recent evince
releases:
$ whohas evince-common | grep ubuntu | grep "3\." | awk {'print $3,$4,$5'}
3.2.0-0ubuntu1 455K http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric/evince-common
3.2.1-0ubuntu2.2 2M http://packages.ubuntu.com/oneiric-updates/evince-commo
no, therre is no warranty bug since we didn't add any distro change to
the code this cycle you have a 95% probability it's an upstream bug, you
can play your odds ... or not
yes you already stated it's a regression, it would be useful to know if
the regression is in evince or poppler or somewhere
There is no warranty that this is an upstream code issue.
I already stated that this is a regression from Oneiric.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966147
Title:
no l
What about trying to be constructive rather than ranting there? First
you could report your upstream bugs to upstream, that would increase the
changes to deal with somebody who knows the software rather than with
ubuntu triagers who do their best but are not writting the code you
complain about.
D
This issue is actually much worse than I expected:
Trying to use the non-free Acrobat Reader to perform the same task, I
was dismayed to notice that it cannot be performed; Adobe expects people
to buy a commercial product to be able to save the form's content back
to the file.
Thus, because of th
It is not a duplicate. This was working fine in Oneiric. The other bug
talks about an issue in Oneiric.
** Description changed:
Evince no longer displays the content of electronic form fields saved
with PDF documents. The updated field content is correctly saved and
appears when someone cl
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 923694 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923694
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 923694, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
** Changed in: evince (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evince in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/966147
Title:
no longer displays saved PDF form content
To manage not
11 matches
Mail list logo
