[Bug 1621203] Re: evolution/totem/gthumb crashes when run in vnc session

2021-04-21 Thread gregrwm
been bothered by this for years with gthumb. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to evolution in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1621203 Title: evolution/totem/gthumb crashes when run in vnc session To manage

[Bug 1923267] Re: indicator-multiload app broken after upgrading libglib2.0-0 2.67.5-2 to 2.68.0-1

2021-04-21 Thread Treviño
The problem is in gjs, and is fixed by https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gjs/-/commit/ec9385b89cb2bce0615093c3c957cbbb5ea6b769 Can be in fact be something a bit more problematic here, as any extension using Gio.File promises won't work. The shell will be affected in a limited way. ** Changed in:

[Bug 1925266] Re: Ubuntu should have two web browsers installed by default.

2021-04-21 Thread Olivier Tilloy
That's exactly what private/incognito modes are for, and what privacy /security-conscious people use. People who don't understand the risks inherent to web browsing should be educated, and I highly doubt offering two web browsers by default would contribute to educating people (that's if it

[Bug 1924932] Re: Nautilus default behaviour for executable scripts is poor

2021-04-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1433774 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1433774 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug 1433774, so it is being marked as such. Please

[Bug 1922952] Re: issue about diskspace 21.04

2021-04-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for taking the time to report this issue and helping to make Ubuntu better. Examining the information you have given us, this does not appear to be a bug report so we are closing it and converting it to a question in the support tracker. We understand the difficulties you are facing, but

[Bug 1820859] Re: nautilus --version segfaults in g_application_impl_get_dbus_object_path

2021-04-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Great, thanks Marco. The release team isn't likely to accept it on the ISO at this point so let's turn it into a 0 day SRU, I'm editing the description ** Description changed: + * Impact + + nautilus hits a segfault when called with the version argument, which + was annoying but became

[Bug 1924888] Re: gnome-disks can't create exfat partitions on Hirsute with the Samsung provided tools.

2021-04-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thanks, indeed that's an udisks issue, I've reported it on https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/issues/882 now ** Bug watch added: github.com/storaged-project/udisks/issues #882 https://github.com/storaged-project/udisks/issues/882 ** Changed in: gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1923845] Re: Please compress packages with zstd by default

2021-04-21 Thread Balint Reczey
Debootstrap fix is merged in Debian: https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/merge_requests/54 ** Also affects: appstream-glib (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: aptly (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: boinc

[Bug 387957] Re: Improve Save As Dialog Box (focus issues)

2021-04-21 Thread Jo Wilkes
This is a very irritating thing, and should be easy to solve. The fix is just changing initial focus! Hard to understand this has been open for 12 years now. There's even a risk of data loss by unintentionally overwriting a file when one types, *as it works just fine on all other OS*, the

[Bug 1923845] Re: Please compress packages with zstd by default

2021-04-21 Thread Julian Andres Klode
There seems to be a bug in bionic's apt. root@bb:/home/jak/Projects# python3 -c 'import apt_inst, apt_pkg; apt_pkg.init(); apt_inst.DebFile("glibc-doc-reference_2.33-0ubuntu2_zstd1_all.deb").control.extractdata("control")' Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in LookupError:

[Bug 1923267] Re: indicator-multiload app broken after upgrading libglib2.0-0 2.67.5-2 to 2.68.0-1

2021-04-21 Thread Sebastien Bacher
The errors seems to be coming from gnome-shell-extension-appindicator there, do you still get the issue using https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension- appindicator/35-1 ? ** Package changed: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) => gnome-shell-extension- appindicator (Ubuntu) -- You received this

[Bug 1917362] Re: PAM: smartcard owner isn't associated to user by default

2021-04-21 Thread Treviño
** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + + Smartcard user is not selected automatically when inserting a smartcard + + [ Test case ] + Insert a smartcard that has an user associated to it: - -> gdm is expected to select the user associated to it and allow authentication +  -> gdm is expected

[Bug 1917362] Re: PAM: smartcard owner isn't associated to user by default

2021-04-21 Thread Sergio Durigan Junior
Hi Iain, AFAIK there is no pending upload to fix this bug on Hirsute -- is there? The only work I've done was to backport the patches mentioned in the Description and upload the package to a PPA. Unless Marco has made an upload, of course. -- You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 1923267] Re: indicator-multiload app broken after upgrading libglib2.0-0 2.67.5-2 to 2.68.0-1

2021-04-21 Thread fprietog
Unfortunately I still got the same problem with gnome-shell-extension- appindicator 35-1 installed. I don't think that this will be related to gnome-shell-extension- appindicator because I'm also getting this error message every boot and it that seems to be the same problem in a different app and

[Bug 1922952] Re: issue about diskspace 21.04

2021-04-21 Thread Lars Martin Hambro
But can you tell? What should linux operatingsystem do if i only get 60 GB free space or less home folder should i expect crash and programs did not works? I think its hard to find out why linux did not boot. Only issue that can get on diskspace: OSError: [Errno 28] none diskspace. But i know

[Bug 1917362] Re: PAM: smartcard owner isn't associated to user by default

2021-04-21 Thread Treviño
> Does this mean that we can close this bug for SSSD, then? I think no, as still the problem stands with multi-certificates cards. But I think we can fix it in II. > Does this mean that we can close this bug for SSSD, then? Yeah, I'm doing it now, I prefer to have at least the GDM side to be in