[Bug 777586] Re: The resolution is stuck at 1024x768

2011-09-05 Thread piviul
I have tried the Oneiric beta and the problem persists. Please have you found a way how to solve the bug? Piviul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777586

[Bug 1771943] Re: nautilus accessing samba shares doesn't use cached credentials

2019-01-30 Thread piviul
journalctl -f nothing is logged when I try to connect a samba share. If I have to enable some flag to have a verbose log please let me know. Piviul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1771943] Re: nautilus accessing samba shares doesn't use cached credentials

2019-01-30 Thread piviul
hare name. If you find some incoherence please let me know and I send you the original log without any substitution. Thank you very much! Piviul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

Re: [Bug 1771943] Re: nautilus accessing samba shares doesn't use cached credentials

2019-01-30 Thread piviul
the current username, domain and password. In other word seems that gio use the cached credential... I can't understand but this is the result. Piviul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https:

Re: [Bug 1771943] Re: nautilus accessing samba shares doesn't use cached credentials

2019-01-30 Thread piviul
e; 1] res = 0, cancelled = 0, errno = [17] 'File giĆ  esistente' smb: do_mount - login successful smb: send_reply(0x55a984ac09d0), failed=0 () Thank you very much! Piviul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nauti

Re: [Bug 1771943] Re: nautilus accessing samba shares doesn't use cached credentials

2019-01-31 Thread piviul
SEC backend 'ntlmssp' registered GENSEC backend 'ntlmssp_resume_ccache' registered GENSEC backend 'http_basic' registered GENSEC backend 'http_ntlm' registered GENSEC backend 'krb5' registered GENSEC backend 'fake_gssapi_krb5' registered Got

[Bug 1771943] Re: nautilus accessing samba shares doesn't use cached credentials

2019-02-11 Thread piviul
But I don't use kerberos, I use winbind to have domain membership authentication! smbclient seems to works perfectly with cached credential if I remove the optional parameter --kerberos... but why gvfs doesn't it? Piviul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1771943] Re: nautilus accessing samba shares doesn't use cached credentials

2019-02-13 Thread piviul
ank you very much indeed. Now I try to resume the upstream bug I have opened in samba. Piviul ** Bug watch added: Samba Bugzilla #10455 https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10455 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1771943] Re: nautilus accessing samba shares doesn't use cached credentials

2019-02-13 Thread piviul
I'm sorry for the comment #16, I have wrong the bug id! If anyone can remove it... Piviul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771943 Title: nautilus accessing

[Bug 1771943] Re: nautilus accessing samba shares doesn't use cached credentials

2019-02-14 Thread piviul
typing a password or I press Ctrl-c the share is correctly mounted... If you need some more infos or do you want to suggest me something else please let me know Piviul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1771943] Re: nautilus accessing samba shares doesn't use cached credentials

2019-02-17 Thread piviul
stien! ...but now do you think these patched gvs packages will be available to the official ubuntu 18.04 repositories? Piviul -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gvfs in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771943

[Bug 1771943] [NEW] nautilus accessing samba shares doesn't use cached credentials

2018-05-17 Thread piviul
, nautilus ask me for a username and password even if I log on using a valid domain account and this valid account can access the samba share. If you need some more info please ask me Have a great day Piviul ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: nautilus 1:3.26.

[Bug 121961] Re: vino should support reverse connections (listen mode)

2009-12-01 Thread piviul
I'm agree with you: it would be very, very interesting! Piviul -- vino should support reverse connections (listen mode) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121961 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is a bug assignee. -- desktop-bugs ma

[Bug 777586] Re: The resolution is stuck at 1024x768

2011-07-04 Thread piviul
My motherboard is an Intel too (D510MO having chipset Intel NM10) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777586 Title: The resolution is stuck at 1024x768 To

[Bug 497048] Re: Brasero fails to burn cue/bin file due to missing -dao within wodim

2010-05-28 Thread piviul
I would like to try the proposed package but... where I can find it? Piviul -- Brasero fails to burn cue/bin file due to missing -dao within wodim https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 497048] Re: Brasero fails to burn cue/bin file due to missing -dao within wodim

2010-05-28 Thread piviul
very sorry for the latest message... it was very simple to install the new proposed update. Well I've installed it but is changed only the error that brasero return: "BraseroWodim asked to stop because of an error". I attach the full brasero log Thank you very much Piviul ** Attachme

[Bug 497048] Re: Brasero fails to burn cue/bin file due to missing -dao within wodim

2010-05-28 Thread piviul
The last logs I've sent are wrong! They are the logs generated from the previous (the "original") version of brasero not the one I've installed from the proposed updates. Now I attach the right logs. I hope you can forgive me. Piviul ** Attachment added: "bra

[Bug 777586] Re: The resolution is stuck at 1024x768

2011-10-16 Thread piviul
I attach gsd-debug-randr.log. If you need something more please tell me. Have agreat day Piviul ** Attachment added: "gsd-debug-randr.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/777586/+attachment/2551029/+files/gsd-debug-randr.log -- You receive

[Bug 777586] [NEW] The resolution is stuck at 1024x768

2011-05-04 Thread piviul
buntu/+bug/776719 but I don't know how to add ubuntu-bug generated report to an existent one. So I close the first and open a new one. Thank you very much Piviul ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38

[Bug 777586] Re: The resolution is stuck at 1024x768

2011-05-04 Thread piviul
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777586 Title: The resolution is stuck at 1024x768 -- desktop-bugs mailing list desktop-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://li

[Bug 777586] Re: The resolution is stuck at 1024x768

2011-07-18 Thread piviul
This is the screen image you ask me. ** Attachment added: "list of available resolutions in monitor applet" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/777586/+attachment/2215121/+files/Schermata-Preferenze%20dei%20monitor.png -- You received this bug notification bec

[Bug 777586] Re: The resolution is stuck at 1024x768

2011-07-18 Thread piviul
This is the screenshot of avaliable resolution after running "xrandr --output VGA1 --mode 1280x1024" It's not strange that the current resolution set using xrandr is not from the available resolutions? Have a great day Piviul ** Attachment added: "list of available re

[Bug 777586] Re: The resolution is stuck at 1024x768

2011-07-18 Thread piviul
Do You mean the output of xrandr --verbose --output VGA1 --mode 1280x1024? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gnome-control-center in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/777586 Title: The resolution is stuck at 1024