Created a new user, copied all data folders to the new user, and the problems
are solved.
Sorry I did not find the cause, but I had to give up searching. At least I am
now fast again.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification
the filechooser does less, do you use icon or list mode in nautilus? try
disabling thumbnailing to see if that makes a difference, it still
doesn't make any sense nautilus would be slower to access a device than
other applications, the access rate is a kernel,driver thing, the
applications don't
Both filechooser as Nautilus are in same mode: list with small thumbs (
Ctrl-2).
I agree it does not make sense at all... Still... it is so easy to see,
that there is no mistake... (starting from Terminal does not show any
error)
What could we do to nail this down? Tests?
--
You received this
does it happen if you use nautilus in icon mode?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001578
Title:
Nautilus on SSD is slower than on external HDD
To manage
Ok, maybe we are on to something:
I have folder ~/Documents with 20 items total of which 11 folder
I have ~/Documents/MyDrawings with 10 files a few images, a few doc files
Test A
1 ~/Documents is in List mode - Clicking on MyDrawings takes 5 seconds to
open. MyDrawings is in *icon* mode
So to go back to some of the previous comments, is that still an issue
only for your user? Could you add your .config/user-dirs.dirs to the bug
report?
Nautilus is slower than the fileselector because it tries to be a bit
smarter in figuring the exact type of the files and collects a bit of
extra
I dont have .config/user-dirs.dirs file or folder...
New user is much faster, on icon and list mode.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001578
Title:
Nautilus on
Hm... I have, no idea I did not see earlier: my user-dirs.dirs:
# This file is written by xdg-user-dirs-update
# If you want to change or add directories, just edit the line you're
# interested in. All local changes will be retained on the next run
# Format is XDG_xxx_DIR=$HOME/yyy, where yyy
I still have the issue... Strange is that using the file dialog, for
example opening a file with an application, is much faster than
nautilusAlso talking seconds here In general, loading
application for example or running updates, the SSD is very fast... just
Nautilus kills me
**
I have had the same problem with a new install and fully updated 12.04
as of yestarday. I was using a OCZ Vertex 4 128GB SSD (with new
firmware 1.4.1.3). I just ended up imaging the whole disk over to a
normal HDD and its much better now.
Just as a few side notes, I was using it in a older HP
I reopen this. I just installed an SSD on my old laptop, which was still
lying around. Nautilus is on that one much faster than my newer HP. Lot
of CPU... something is killing it. Let me try to make new, clean user
and see what happens.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid =
does it happen the same way in a guest session?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001578
Title:
Nautilus on SSD is slower than on external HDD
To manage
I just tried and guest session is fast, just a like a new user - good
news :)
Now find out is causing the CPU kill... some old Nautilus action? Some
nautilus plugins I loaded long time ago but dont show up anymore? Can
not find it any idea?
--
You received this bug notification because you
renamed ~/.gconf/apps/nautilus-actions to ~/.gconf/apps/nautilus-
actions.bak ... en .. fast :) I have cheered too soon in past, but for
now... happy )
Will mark problem solved / invalid now... although I dont understand why
this was the problem and will come back if I know more or see more
that's weird, nautilus is not even using gconf in precise, though
nautilus-action might be...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001578
Title:
Nautilus on SSD is
that's why I did not look at it first place, anyway, fast is fast...
keep posted if slowness comes back. If not, well, then we found cause.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001578
Title:
Nautilus on SSD is slower than on external HDD
To
I marked this my self as invalid, as Nautilus seems now fast again :)
This is what I did:
1 - rename ~/.gnome2 to .gnome2.bak
2 - rename ~/.gconf/apps/nautilus to nautilus.bak
Restart Nautlius fast ! ))
Not sure which one of the renames (actually deletion of of the folder)
solved
1. filesystem is ext4
2. view modes have all same problem.
3. extra test: using Truecrypt folder is also much slower on 12.04 with
Nautilus than on 10.10 where I came from. A folder with let's say 20 200K
pictures takes about 10 seconds to open, with full CPU. So behaviour on
Truecrypt is same
that's an option, videos often help to understand the issue
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001578
Title:
Nautilus on SSD is slower than on external HDD
To
I will come back with a Youtube.. .that is best I think ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1001578
Title:
Nautilus on SSD is slower than on external HDD
To manage
This may be a nautilus bug. I will switch this bug over to there to get
feedback.
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) = nautilus (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Medium = Undecided
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
--
You received this bug
Not sure what this bug is about but it seems weird, nautilus doesn't
limit io in any way and there is no reason that cpu bound should make a
different on the disk type...
where is nautilus being slow? what filesystem and view mode do you use?
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance:
23 matches
Mail list logo
