Seb uploaded a fixed nautilus package to the queue. Stalling until
8.04.3 is released.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an
it really would be nice to able to configure the Domain-Server or Workgroup
of a MS-Net when you install Ubuntu or be able to search it automatically.
You must fiddle around with config files to get the correct name.
Older versions had a configuration (The old network manager) to setup
this.
I
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 09:38:57AM -, Renzo Bagnati wrote:
However I'm still experiencing a known issue with nautilus: double
clicking the first time on a share icon does not open a new window, I
have to double click again a second time to actually open it. This should
have been fixed by
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 01:27:49PM -, Martin G Miller wrote:
Something about DNS redirection causes network browsing failures in
Nautilus.
That is unrelated to this bug report.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
yep, I have 9.04 installed so will try to run tests today and will let you
know
2009/5/11 Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com
could you try if the new issue is there in jaunty too?
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
Is there a need to test it on 8.10 then?
2009/5/11 Renzo Bagnati ren...@gmail.com
No, the issues of comment 220 are not present in jaunty and in intrepid.
They are specific of hardy and of the
95_svn_change_fix_smb_browsing.patch, since reverting to the version of
gvfs in hardy-updates
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 03:40:39PM -, Matthijs ten Kate wrote:
I can imagine that our problem is not fully related to the original bug
since the i5/OS NetServer software wasn't compiled by our friend from
Redmond, so if I need to file a new bug for our situation, please let me
know.
JuanHoyos [2009-02-14 16:22 -]:
Will this bugfix make it to Hardy someday?
Yes.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is
Will this bugfix make it to Hardy someday?
Juan David
---
Aviso legal (disclaimer): http://www.videobase.net/disclaimer/
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification
On Intrepid and Jaunty everything work. Tanks
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Desktop Bugs, which is the registrant for gvfs.
--
was intentional..
I liken this behavior to putting in a \\servername in windows.
- Original Message -
From: max mik...@gmail.com
To: ja...@rubixnet.com
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 12:23:49 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares
207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for
machines inside an ADS network.
On Intrepid and Jaunty everything work. Tanks
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207072
You received this bug notification because you
display location smb://servername/
The specified location is not mounted
- Original Message -
From: Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com
To: ja...@rubixnet.com
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 1:04:18 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba
26, 2009 1:22:10 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines
inside an ADS network.
I'd also like to add that this is not a regression, the unpatched
version of nautilus/gvfs also gives the exact same results.
--
nautilus does
not display samba shares for machines
inside an ADS network.
Tab, this is a different issue than the one being discussed here. The
problem you are reporting is discussed in bug #216104.
--
nautilus does not display samba shares for machines inside an ADS network.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 11:16:54PM -, NTolerance wrote:
I've got proposed enabled in my sources.list. When I run sudo aptitude
-t intrepid-proposed I don't see the new nautilus and gvfs packaging
after refreshing my package list. Do I need to wait longer for this to
hit the
FAJALOU [2009-01-08 0:27 -]:
Thanks Sebastien. Just as one final note... Will it come up in Hardy
backports... Or Intrepid only?
We definitively aim for hardy-proposed and then hardy-updates, so that
everyone will get it. Intrepid, too, of course.
--
nautilus does not display samba
Renzo,
Thanks for the reply. I completely missed 54-57 and they helped much. Just
as a note in case someone else runs into this:
I downloaded the source which placed a folder called gvfs-0.2.5. Then
moved to ~/gvfs-0.2.5/daemon/ folder and downloaded and saved the patched
titled patch to
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 16:44, FAJALOU cunninghamlo...@gmail.com
wrote:
I agree with John; I have no idea how to apply the patch, but would love
to know how, anyone help? 8.04.1 here. Thanks
JT - Yeah. I figured out why everyone ignored me. Apparently Linux has
this nice little command
If you compile gvfs yourself it works again. Let's hope it will be
intregrated to the ubuntu repo soon.
Am Donnerstag, den 04.12.2008, 17:09 + schrieb Renzo Bagnati:
There is now an upstream near-final patch for gvfs that is working well in
intrepid and which does not have the problems
Have we heard anything from Canonical about why gvfs was included in the
first place? I mean I've heard Debian Lenny which is about to be released
still uses the older gnome-vfs.
On another note, I would like to know how I might apply the patch made by
Darkrain42(I think) which fixes this.
On
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 01:42:49PM -, Matthijs ten Kate wrote:
So perhaps this bug isn't entirely limited to gvfs...
Yes, it is. If you're experiencing problems with other clients, those are
unrelated bugs and should be filed separately.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a
I was in the office on a separate network and the problem still exists.
False alarm. Sorry.
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 14:52, gerstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my case, the problem still remains. All Samba-Shares even from other
Linux-Computers can be viewed, but all the Shares of
I just got an update to samba and it seems to have fixed this for me. I
don't want to get everyone's hopes up but give it a try. The update also
came with a bunch of things, like a kernel update, etc.
On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 08:59 +, gerstrong wrote:
Bug is also in Ubuntu daily-live of
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:10:01PM -, John Toliver wrote:
I just got an update to samba and it seems to have fixed this for me.
If a samba update fixed anything for you, it was not this bug. This is not
a bug in samba.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a
I know this has been stated repeatedly, however when I use the ubuntu (or
nautilus) network icon to browse (instead of the one created by fusesmb), I
no longer have the problem viewing the shares on other machines. Nothing
else on my setup has changed. I will continue to test my network browsing
In my case, the problem still remains. All Samba-Shares even from other
Linux-Computers can be viewed, but all the Shares of Windows-PCs are not
seen. In Konqueror, both can be viewed.
What I don't understand, that it requests the password after entering
into the share, not before browsing to PC.
fusesmb is a fairly decent work around from the home user perspective. In
light of the fact that upstream isn't addressing the fix or at least it
isn't available yet, does anyone know of a way to ask Canonical to downgrade
to the version of samba that worked properly in Gutsy? Would it be THAT
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 07:15:52PM -, John Toliver wrote:
fusesmb is a fairly decent work around from the home user perspective. In
light of the fact that upstream isn't addressing the fix or at least it
isn't available yet, does anyone know of a way to ask Canonical to downgrade
to the
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:58 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
changing GNOME to use gnomevfs rather than gvfs would basically means
downgrading some hundred applications and the GNOME desktop to its gutsy
version, you can as well use gutsy if that's to do that change
Or use the about to be
I might just give that a try... thank you.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 18:13, Tim Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 19:58 +, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
changing GNOME to use gnomevfs rather than gvfs would basically means
downgrading some hundred applications and the
(GMT-05:00)
Subject: [Bug 207072] Re: nautilus does not display samba shares for machines
inside an ADS network.
I am running Ubuntu 8.04.1 32 bit and this bug hit me suddenly this
morning. Up till now, I was able to browse my office networks smb
shares without difficulty. As of this morning, none
Does anyone think that they can get the working patch to the repos? I too
am not confident in compiling things for the most part; and it seems that
this patch works; so why not just stick it in now, and then work on it from
there? At least this way we will be able to use Samba while the problem
Hi
Just to add I've used the latest instructions on this thread (apt-get source
etc, comment from Renzo Bagnati above) to download the latest gvfs source
code, and guess what; *the original patch still works*
I suggest that anyone still experiencing the problem and his patched
executable got
On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 02:28:45PM -, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
upstream spotted issues in the current changes but nobody is actively
working on gvfs smb or knowing the code well enough to fix that easily
at the moment apparently
Well, this issue has been discussed on the Samba upstream
Hi
I've re-tested after all updates (incl. kernel update) and the patch still
works. Suggest that you check the folder /usr/lib/gvfs/ for the patched
executable.
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:23 AM, cRoW2k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with latest update (27/05) bug still present. But usign
Hi
Seems to me that you're referring to another bug. What I've observed is that
the Network is working but not predictably. For example, if you login
and go to nautilus - network, it is empty. If you leave things as they are
for 5-10 minutes, then try again, there are some things appearing. I
Some things to check:
1. Make sure that the executable is replaced and no Update Manager has
done any updates.
2. Verify MD5 of the executable I've provided vs. the executable in the
final location
File size in bytes: 108656
File name: gvfsd-smb-browse
$ file gvfsd-smb-browse
gvfsd-smb-browse:
38 matches
Mail list logo
