On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:35 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
It's time to think about the 2.10 release notes.
Could GNOME maintainers please tell us about major user-visible changes
in their modules, by editing this page:
http://live.gnome.org/ReleaseNotes
or just email them to me or the
Hey ~
I'm requesting a break in the 2.10 freeze for bug 167090 [*] to go
through. I put some detailed reasons in the first comment of that bug.
Plus there is also some fascinating commentary by me in comment 13 of
bug 161613 [**] regarding the same issue. ;-)
Simply put I'd like to remove the
I support this strongly; I understand the conceptual model behind
putting run application... in Applications but it totally doesn't fit
with anything else we do.
Luis
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:19:05 -0500, Bryan Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey ~
I'm requesting a break in the 2.10 freeze for
quote who=Bryan Clark
Simply put I'd like to remove the 'Run Application' menu item from the
Applications menu top level since it shouldn't be something that most of
our users are expected to interact with very often or at all. This
doesn't mean removing it's functionality, just removing it
On Sat, 2005-12-02 at 16:20 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 21:35 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
It's time to think about the 2.10 release notes.
Could GNOME maintainers please tell us about major user-visible changes
in their modules, by editing this page:
On Sun, 2005-13-02 at 12:58 +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
quote who=Elijah Newren
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:36:39 +1100, Jeff Waugh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
quote who=Colin Walters
Personally, whenever I want to run Emacs or whatever's not in the
menu, I use Alt-F2, not the menu
quote who=Bryan Clark
So what if we are flamed for removing this? If it's the right thing to
do, isn't that worth getting flamed for? ;-)
Even if the 'Run Applications' has been around since the beginning of
GNOME, that doesn't mean it's a good thing. If we keep with that
mentality we'll
