On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 19:56 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:20 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
Hi,
Looking at the schedule I thought I'd missed the time period left for
new modules, but looking again it appears we still have a small amount
of time. I'd like to propose
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 07:58 +0200, Jon K Hellan wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 19:56 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:20 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
Hi,
Looking at the schedule I thought I'd missed the time period left for
new modules, but looking again it appears
On Thu, 2005-14-07 at 02:04 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
I'm not sure how to answer that since I don't know exactly what you're
referring to by gnome-print. There's no such module...
What do you call the library that handles the printing in gnumeric,
gedit, gpdf, etc?
(Oh, and you copied this
On 7/14/05, Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 07:58 +0200, Jon K Hellan wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 19:56 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:20 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
Hi,
Looking at the schedule I thought I'd missed the time
Mystilleef wrote:
I'm not sure how to answer that since I don't know exactly what you're
referring to by gnome-print. There's no such module...
I think he is referring to libgnomeprint and libgnomeprintui. It seems
your library performs almost all the function those libraries perform.
I
On Thu, 2005-14-07 at 14:35 +0800, James Henstridge wrote:
Mystilleef wrote:
I'm not sure how to answer that since I don't know exactly what you're
referring to by gnome-print. There's no such module...
I think he is referring to libgnomeprint and libgnomeprintui. It seems
your
On 7/14/05, Andreas J. Guelzow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Closely connected to libgnomeprint[ui] is also the gnome-cups-manager
which on first glance provides a similar service to eggcups.
Andreas
--
Andreas J. Guelzow
Taliesin Software, Shelties, Pyr Sheps
and Shetland Sheep
Okay so
Am Mittwoch, den 13.07.2005, 12:11 +0200 schrieb Alexander Larsson:
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 20:24 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote:
From bug 105521 [1]:
Also, I'm not sure we should do this change at this late stage. As the
comment in the bug says, other modules needs to change to be similar
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 19:56 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
Opinions?
Hi,
It seems pretty minimalistic, there is no UI to configure a
non-detectable printer by example (lp, smb, ...). Wouldn't
gnome-cups-manager be better for users?
Cheers,
Sebastien Bacher
On 7/14/05, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 19:56 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
Opinions?
Hi,
It seems pretty minimalistic, there is no UI to configure a
non-detectable printer by example (lp, smb, ...). Wouldn't
gnome-cups-manager be better
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:33 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le mercredi 13 juillet 2005 à 19:56 -0400, Colin Walters a écrit :
Opinions?
Hi,
It seems pretty minimalistic, there is no UI to configure a
non-detectable printer by example (lp, smb, ...).
That's true, but my feeling on
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:04 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Also, Colin, does eggcups still depend on a patched cupsd? I'm not
sure if that should matter, but seems like it is relevant for testing,
etc.
It does. I could make it work for the non-dbus cupsd case, but only for
applications which print
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, [utf-8] Danilo ??egan wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:06:56 +0200
From: [utf-8] Danilo ??egan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Sobala [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: GNOME Desktop desktop-devel-list@gnome.org,
Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED], foundation-list@gnome.org,
Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mer, 2005-07-13 at 21:04, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
The first two seem like no-brainers, but what are you thinking of
'harming the name of GNOME'? Is a clause requiring acceptable levels of
privacy
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:06 +0200, Danilo Šegan wrote:
Yesterday at 21:54, Andrew Sobala wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 20:42 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mer, 2005-07-13 at 16:27, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Level 2 - the app is actually written with GTK+.
Why does this matter ?
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
On Mer, 2005-07-13 at 21:04, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
The first two seem like no-brainers, but what are you thinking of
'harming the name of GNOME'? Is
lör 2005-07-09 klockan 22:54 +0200 skrev Christian Rose:
fre 2005-06-10 klockan 13:53 -0400 skrev Luis Villa:
Seems to me that gnome-keyring-manager should at a minimum go into
meta-gnome-proposed in jhbuild*, and seems (to me) to fill a fairly
important need for key management, and should
A clean checkout of gnome-keyring in jhbuild gives me:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -DPREFIX=\/opt/gnome212\
-DBINDIR=\/opt/gnome212/bin\ -DLIBEXECDIR=\/opt/gnome212/libexec\
-DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\/opt/gnome212/share/locale\ -I. -I. -D_XOPEN_SOURCE
-I/opt/gnome212/include/gtk-2.0
I've just updated the wiki:
http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning_2fTwoPointEleven_2fDesktop
As of this moment, proposed modules are (AFAIK):
* evince: seems to be a strong consensus for this
* gnome-keyring-manager: I've not heard a strongyay or nay on this, I
think even from the maintainer.
Colin Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 19:34 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
We want ISV to code against Gnome/GTK+, this is a Foundation position,
reflected by the licences of our platform libraries.
Yes, I see the merit there, and LGPL is a good choice.
I'd also
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:31 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Or one day we may want to refuse certification from companies
that support the other operating system :D.
I know you're probably being sarcastic. However, for that reason I think
it's important to do a very good job of specifying what
Christian Rose [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any news on this? Was or wasn't gnome-keyring-manager officially
proposed? And how about evince? Or did both of these proposals just fall
inbetween the cracks?
We need some clarification here.
I could have sworn we proposed evince. Consider it
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 17:19 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
I've just updated the wiki:
http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning_2fTwoPointEleven_2fDesktop
As of this moment, proposed modules are (AFAIK):
Just for reference from the GDP end:
* evince: seems to be a strong consensus for this
No
Really. The default theme. Let's make this happen.
http://www.gnome.org/~shaunm/Clearlooks.tar
Take that tarball. Extract it in a fresh gnome-themes checkout.
It'll add the Clearlooks Metacity theme, the ClearlooksBlue GTK
theme, and the ClearlooksBlue desktop theme. Compare Clearlooks
Be merry, or else! ;-)
Hurray!
Let us rejoice in the glow of the freshly re-painted bike shed.
Thanks Shaun.
- Callum
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Today some folks here at Red Hat discussed the new about-me capplet,
and we decided to disable it for now and stick with our homegrown
usermode capplets for now. Maybe the main points of our discussion
are of interest and can help to improve the about-me capplet.
Matthias
Pro:
- reduces menu
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 16:04 -0400, Jonathan Blandford wrote:
The HIG doesn't define widget behavior very well.
And nor is it supposed to... it's about informing the UI design
decisions that developers have to make, not describing stuff that the
toolkit should be doing for them.
To that end,
Hey :),
--- Luis Villa [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
I've just updated the wiki:
http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning_2fTwoPointEleven_2fDesktop
As of this moment, proposed modules are (AFAIK):
* evince: seems to be a strong consensus for this
* gnome-keyring-manager: I've not heard a
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 19:53 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Today some folks here at Red Hat discussed the new about-me capplet,
and we decided to disable it for now and stick with our homegrown
usermode capplets for now. Maybe the main points of our discussion
are of interest and can help to
So, I'm now tinderboxing with 'make check' turned on.
This is good, in that we have more testing. Maintainers who do not
immediately start writing tests which run on make check are
poopieheads. :) [2]
This is bad, in that lots of things are failing right now. I plan to
file bugs on these as
And by winner, I mean LOSAH.
tinderbox, having guessed that the magic word was 'dbus', was given
the appetizing choice of door #1, door #2, or door #842, chose #842.
Looking behind door #842:
http://cvs.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus/ChangeLog?rev=1.842view=markup
means we did not get the car behind
Diego Gonzalez wrote:
- doesn't allow to change the user's full name
In debian i can't change the full name of the user (i need to be root to
do so), show me a way to do it and i will have no problem implementing
it.
From /etc/login.defs on my Ubuntu box:
#
# Which fields may be
Hi,
I just implemented overwrite confirmation for the file chooser. You
have to enable this feature explicitly, to keep compatibility with
applications that already pop up their custom confirmation dialogs.
Please read this blog entry for the details:
33 matches
Mail list logo
