quote who=Federico Mena Quintero
Mark Shuttleworth, during his keynote at GUADEC, gave an awesome demo of
Ubuntu's meta-bug tracker: they maintain pointers for the same bug across
the different bug trackers of different distros, and thus they magically
know when any of them manages to fix
quote who=Luis Villa
On 7/22/05, Sri Ramkrishna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Seems like the Ubuntu folks are coming up with the solutions anyways.
I (and I expect others) would certainly be displeased if we became
dependent on a proprietary tool to manage our bugs or release process. As
long
Hi Colin,
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 16:03 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 17:16 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
For various reasons I'm not entirely sure it makes sense to use D-BUS
notification:
- We're not actually interested in using the D-BUS service acquired
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:25:01 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Similar with libgtop:
...
make[2]: *** [bg.gmo] Error 1
Strange, this seems like a bug in intltool-update as the plural forms are
not updated. I've made a patch and hope that our fearless team leader
will fix it asap. In case you need it
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi,
I've removed gnome-smproxy from gnome-session HEAD now.
Can I plead for some traces of gnome-smproxy to be remained on gnome cvs
for the following reasons:
(1) On Solaris, CDE will remain for a long time to come and all the CDE
apps need
On 7/28/05, Yavor Doganov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:25:01 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Similar with libgtop:
Fixed in CVS by Alexander Shopov. Apologies for this blunder.
Thanks, Yavor, Alexander. Much appreciated.
Luis (sparing you all for the weekend)
P.S. anyone
On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 12:25 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
* gnome-applets xkb stuff
Still not fixed.
Should be fixed now. Looks like the combination of a compiling chunks
out of order and some randomly confusing #defines (I don't know how or
why those changed). Compiles for me now on two
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Ghee,
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 11:51 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
(a) Create a new CVS module that just contains smproxy
I've no problem at all with you doing this.
However, do note that you'll also need patches to make GNOME not get
screwed up
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:22 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Ghee,
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 11:51 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
(a) Create a new CVS module that just contains smproxy
I've no problem at all with you doing this.
However, do note that
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:22 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
Hi Ghee,
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 11:51 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
(a) Create a new CVS module that just contains smproxy
I've no problem at all with you doing this.
However, do note that
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:32 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
You misunderstood what Mark said. It will be up to the maintainer of
that module (a priori, yourself) to handle bugs. However, he pointed you
to a bunch of bugs with existing patches. If you want the bugs to stay,
you're free not to
Bastien,
You are right! I have misunderstood Mark. Sorry Mark :)
Mark,
What you have said below is precisely what I have in mind! Thank you
for saying out loud for me. :)
-Ghee
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 15:22 +0100, ghee teo wrote:
Mark McLoughlin wrote:
On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 17:49 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
Punted to 2.13/2.14
* eggcups: this was pushed very late, and partially as a result there
* productivity/office suite: the discussions about where this would
I'm guessing gnome-power-manager[1] and gnome-screensaver fall into the
2.14
13 matches
Mail list logo
