Re: Gnome 2.14 Module Proposal: Deskbar Applet

2005-10-29 Thread Raphael Slinckx
On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 00:29 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote: what the difference between your search engine and beagle's ? Just to make things clear: We do not *want* to index anything, we are just a front-end, an UI for the broad range of services offered in a nearly-stock gnome desktop, allowing

Re: Gnome 2.14 Module Proposal: Deskbar Applet

2005-10-29 Thread Raphael Slinckx
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 17:03 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote: Le mardi 25 octobre 2005 à 00:35 +0200, Benoît Dejean a écrit : Le dimanche 23 octobre 2005 à 19:19 +0200, Raphael Slinckx a écrit : Raphael, do you how much memory takes the in-memory cache ? How can i know that ? More generally, are

Re: Gnome 2.14 Module Proposal: Deskbar Applet

2005-10-29 Thread Raphael Slinckx
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 13:32 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: It's possible, and I know how. Say you have 10 python applets. Now, it should be feasible to leverage the bonobo component system to make them all share the same process, like this: 1. Create a special exe

Re: Gnome 2.14 Module Proposal: Deskbar Applet

2005-10-29 Thread Raphael Slinckx
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 23:28 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote: Maybe replacing the run dialog with deskbar (at least by default) is going a bit too far. But, please, shipping one more optional applet is not going to hurt anyone. This would certainly be a nice touch. Maybe with some time, it

Re: Gnome 2.14 Module Proposal: Deskbar Applet

2005-10-29 Thread Jamie McCracken
Raphael Slinckx wrote: On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 13:01 +0100, Jamie McCracken wrote: Tracker is still under developement and for 2.14 I am hoping to optionally integrate Tracker into Nautilus (for metadata and search) and possibly Gnome-VFS to get Vfolders style functionality. That is

Re: Gnome 2.14 Module Proposal: Deskbar Applet

2005-10-29 Thread Elijah Newren
On 10/29/05, Raphael Slinckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, i like the approach of an expermiental gconf key to enable alt-f2 replacement, maybe we can try to make that happen, it won't hurt anybody, and yet will allow to receive feedback from user who choose to activate it. A question though,

Re: Proposal for inclusion in Desktop: pessulus

2005-10-29 Thread Sri Ramkrishna
I don't see a problem with a lockdown editor. For instance, parents could use it in the future so that epiphany will not surf .xxx sites or something of that nature to protect their kids. Maybe there might be some kind of virus or something that in the future could change gconf values in order