Le vendredi 17 février 2006 à 01:56 +0100, edoardo a écrit :
hi guys : )
i don't write much on this list, but i think a few days ago i had a fantastic
idea for gnome three. it's a revolution.
(snap)
Could you just explain the advantages of your solution over using an
always-visible panel
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 13:33 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
For completeness, I should also note that there are two other big
problems involved which I don't know how to solve on a short timescale
(e.g. before 2.16):
- Havoc's recent points about identifying our target audience is
important in
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 01:12 -0800, Alex Graveley wrote:
*cough* tomboy *cough*
Tomboy is a great example. Its a great piece of software that does new
exciting things. If tomboy would be excluded from the desktop for some
technicality I would be very sad.
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:38 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 01:41 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
So, what
if we just set a list of things a module has to conform with to get
accepted and base our decisions on that?
For instance, we could have:
* uses at least basic
sorry about the empty e-mail, dont know what happened,this is just a reply to edoardo wrote:hello,
think having this function will only confuse people, if i middle click i expect don't expect a menu,
using this middle mouse button for a popup is similar to the way Maya (3D programme)is
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 13:33 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
- David's recent point in this thread about the desktop release set
not being so important also rings true to me. It's a binary in-or-out
yet there are lots of really rocking Gnome programs that are well
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:11 -0500, Dan Winship wrote:
Murray Cumming wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 13:33 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:
- David's recent point in this thread about the desktop release set
not being so important also rings true to me. It's a binary in-or-out
yet there are
Hi,
I think our thinking historically has been that distro's who really care
about GNOME don't really 'care' that much about our list of stuff in the
desktop release as they have a pretty good idea themselves what they
want/don't want. Distro's which don't care much about GNOME on the other
hand
On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 08:46:11AM -0500, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 14:52 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
If this is what
Redhat thinks of the work done
I thought it was obvious, but I'd like to point out that I'm not
speaking on behalf of Red Hat on this matter.
It's
Hi Dan,
Today at 15:11, Dan Winship wrote:
Do we have any evidence that any distro actually cares what we consider
to be in and out of the desktop release? Is there some distro out there
loyally shipping epiphany as its default browser and waiting for us to
certify GIMP before they allow it
10 matches
Mail list logo
