tor, 13,.04.2006 kl. 14.49 -0400, skrev Rodney Dawes:
Looks OK to me. Perhaps you could add a note about the no/nb thing too,
so that we can ensure all the modules are using nb now as the locale
name. That would help alleviate the concerns that Joe Shaw brought up
yesterday in his blog entry
fre, 14,.04.2006 kl. 15.51 +0200, skrev Kjartan Maraas:
tor, 13,.04.2006 kl. 14.49 -0400, skrev Rodney Dawes:
Looks OK to me. Perhaps you could add a note about the no/nb thing too,
so that we can ensure all the modules are using nb now as the locale
name. That would help alleviate the
On 4/14/06, Ross Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The subject says it all really...
Don't forget to cc gnome-doc-list. ;) (And I'm pretty sure Luis will
be asking for plans soon as well...)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 03:20 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
And Rodney, can you make that 0.35 release or at least bump the
version up to 0.35, so we can simply require 0.35 instead of
0.34.90?
I can roll an 0.34.90 tarball if people think that is necessary. I don't
want to release 0.35 though,
On 4/12/06, Brent Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott J. Harmon wrote:
Too bad that documentation is horribly out of date.
Seems like nobody wants to contribute to documentation these days...
Updated PDFs for 2.14 at http://www.gnome.org/~bmsmith/gnome-2-14-pdfs/
Check out
