Perhaps Microsoft and Fluendo would find it interesting to work a
license with the GNOME community
Such a license would violate any of the ideals that we stand for.
Ronald is correct, it would violate the Free as in Freedom. However,
you should be taking this to the distributions
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 03:43:49PM -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:26:59 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Here at Sun, we have been talking with Fluendo about licensing these
plugins. As you can imagine, it is fairly expensive to acquire a
license that allows a
On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 15:43 -0400, Ronald S. Bultje wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:26:59 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Here at Sun, we have been talking with Fluendo about licensing these
plugins. As you can imagine, it is fairly expensive to acquire a
license that allows a vendor to freely
quote who=Brian Cameron
I just found it interesting that Fluendo seemed agreeable to the idea that
the GNOME community in general could work together to purchase a single
license for all users. If there were enough interest to do something like
this, it would make the GNOME user experience
Dear Gnome Developers,
I experience the 2.14 logoff-dialog as a step back in userfriendlyness versus the 2.10/12 version.
End-users hate decisions.
In 2.10/12 a selection had to be made but once a decision was made this selection was rememberd.
Replacing the radio-buttons with normal
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Brian Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Also, it seems supporting popular IP multimedia codecs would likely
make free software more popular rather than less. Since the
license must be renewed each year, such an arrangement could be
terminated in the future if
