On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 19:32 +0100, Don Scorgie wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, David Trowbridge wrote:
What in particular isn't possible with the 6-month cycle?
For one thing: the documentation gets squeezed. We (the doc team) have,
basically, 3 month to document all the
quote who=Shaun McCance
Here is my much-anticipated MASTER PLAN:
Using my incredible mathematical genius, I have figured out how to fit an
entire nine months of work into only six months.
I don't believe that directly splitting the focus between new development
and bug fixing, or
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 13:56 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
Hubert Figuiere wrote:
I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month
release
schedule of Gnome to do a major release with a certain number of feature
that would involve possible infrastructure changes in the
2006/9/8, Rodrigo Moya [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 19:51 +0100, Jamie McCracken wrote:
Hubert Figuiere wrote:
Hi,
I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month
release
schedule of Gnome to do a major release with a certain number of feature
Le jeudi 07 septembre 2006, à 19:32, Don Scorgie a écrit :
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, David Trowbridge wrote:
What in particular isn't possible with the 6-month cycle?
For one thing: the documentation gets squeezed. We (the doc team) have,
basically, 3 month to document all
I'd like to suggest two ways to print multiple documents easily, since
nowadays it involves opening them one by one which can become
burdensome. Please tell me your opinions about these:
A. we already can send stuff to a bluetooth device through
nautilus-sendto. Wouldn't it be cool
Hi Andrew,
Quoting Andrew Cowie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We regularly have people showing up who are asking us questions about
gtk 2.6 and using a version that is *FOUR* cycles old. We can't support
that as we've long since moved on from there (shit, the people who wrote
that code aren't even
On Sex, 2006-09-08 at 01:00 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 19:32 +0100, Don Scorgie wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, David Trowbridge wrote:
What in particular isn't possible with the 6-month cycle?
For one thing: the documentation gets squeezed.
Hello all !
Since march, i'm designing and developping a Gnome Scan infrastructure.
See http://home.gna.org/gnomescan/index and Google gnome scan search
result in general. I've been sponsored by Google do work on this project
this summer. Mentored by Vincent Untz.
The project is far from
On 08/09/06, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your master plan implies branching early and heavily committing to
both branches for a long time. Reality check: we are still using this
archaic software called C.V.S.! Branching with that software is
incredibly complex.
On Friday 08 September 2006 08:57, James Henstridge wrote:
The real issue with handling development in parallel branches is
really complexity of merging. This is an area where Subversion
doesn't really buy you much over CVS -- you still need to manually
keep track of what you merged to do a
Do you want gnome scan for 2.18 ?
I sure do! please keep up the hard work, this project got me really
excited.
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hello,
I sure do! please keep up the hard work, this project got me really
excited.
Héhé :)
I wrote a RoadMap in the Wiki.
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeScanning#head-39b656e3f4fce8abe4bf0da2cee994cffa9b90b8
I'm currently packaging gnomescan for debian/ubuntu.
Étienne.
--
Verso l'Alto !
Hello,
I am curious to know what the word flegita means. Searches using
google and dictionaries in three languages didn't turn up anything which
looked relevant.
Good question. :) flegita is an esperanto word that mean cured.
Étienne.
--
Verso l'Alto !
On 08/09/06, Hubert Figuiere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 08 September 2006 08:57, James Henstridge wrote:
The real issue with handling development in parallel branches is
really complexity of merging. This is an area where Subversion
doesn't really buy you much over CVS -- you still
Where is the source???
-Joseph
===
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 15:45 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
Hello,
I am curious to know what the word flegita means. Searches using
google and dictionaries in three languages didn't turn
Hello,
Where is the source???
I pointed the current projet homepage :
http://home.gna.org/gnomescan/index . Follow the projet page link and
you'll be lead to SVN. You can also use tarballs from
http://home.gna.org/gnomescan/download .
However, i released a 0.2.3 (including deutsch
Thanks... I will try it out this weekend. If all goes well, I will add
it to GARNOME so others can play with it an provide feedback.
-Joseph
==
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 16:15 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
Hello,
Where is the source???
I pointed the
Hi,
Thanks... I will try it out this weekend. If all goes well, I will add
it to GARNOME so others can play with it an provide feedback.
Wow ! Nice ! Thank you ! :D
Étienne.
--
Verso l'Alto !
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 14:44 +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote:
The people I work with on java-gnome won't be able to hack on GNOME 2.16
specific bindings until we have GNOME 2.16 desktops on our systems. My
systems are otherwise production (in the sense that I use them to do
business so I can't
You are welcome...
-Joseph
==
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 16:51 +0200, Étienne Bersac wrote:
Hi,
Thanks... I will try it out this weekend. If all goes well, I will add
it to GARNOME so others can play with it an provide feedback.
Hi,
* XSMP does a number of useful session-managey things (logout
notification, logout cancellation, specifying apps that
should be restarted right away if they crash, specifying
commands to run at logout, etc) which we currently have no
other
*The Lower Desktop, Upper Desktops*
(a letter to the Gnome community, in a poor English)
It was about two years while I was more or less in touch with Gnome,
and I must say that no other large free software project delivers so
much confusion to an outsider. And since Gnome has
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 12:59 -0400, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month release
schedule of Gnome to do a major release with a certain number of feature
that would involve possible infrastructure changes in the platform.
Not sure
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 11:18 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
On Sex, 2006-09-08 at 01:00 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 19:32 +0100, Don Scorgie wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 11:24 -0700, David Trowbridge wrote:
What in particular isn't possible with
James Henstridge wrote:
On 08/09/06, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your master plan implies branching early and heavily committing to
both branches for a long time. Reality check: we are still using this
archaic software called C.V.S.! Branching with that software is
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 10:17 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 13:56 -0400, Pat Suwalski wrote:
Hubert Figuiere wrote:
I would like to suggest at one point to try to break with the 6 month
release
schedule of Gnome to do a major release with a certain number of
On Fri, 2006-09-08 at 01:00 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
snip
Here is my much-anticipated MASTER PLAN:
Using my incredible mathematical genius, I have figured
out how to fit an entire nine months of work into only
six months. I knew there was a reason I got a degree
in mathematics. (Or
On 9/8/06, Don Scorgie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doc people do not have enough time. Its as simple as that. As shaunm
pointed out, this release we got 4 weeks to update the documentation.
This included 3 new modules needing docs, as well as lots of updates to
lots of other docs. The doc team
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
To me, that makes sense. An untranslated string is just as annoying as
a frequently segfaulting program. So lets treat the problems the same.
Code that changes behaviour shouldn't be committed unless the
documentation is
В Сбт, 09/09/2006 в 04:55 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist пишет:
On 9/8/06, Don Scorgie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doc people do not have enough time. Its as simple as that. As shaunm
pointed out, this release we got 4 weeks to update the documentation.
This included 3 new modules needing docs, as
31 matches
Mail list logo
