On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 19:40 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
(Note: let's suppose we have a developer tools suite)
Information about devhelp:
http://developer.imendio.com/projects/devhelp
+1 - devhelp is a fundamental part of the developer experience in
GNOME; and if it's not, it should be. :-)
Danilo Šegan wrote:
Hi Bill,
Today at 17:51, Bill Haneman wrote:
I've created gnome-2.16 branches for atk and gail.
atk seems to be under
http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/atk/tags/gnome-2-16/
instead of
http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/atk/branches/gnome-2-16/
Similarly for gail
Hei all!
2007/1/8, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You can learn about seahorse here:
http://www.gnome.org/projects/seahorse/
+1!
--lucasr
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
On 1/8/07, Don Scorgie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 19:34 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Information about gnome-main-menu:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-October/msg00221.html
Danilo's evaluation (i18n point of view):
MISSING :-)
That's
man, 08.01.2007 kl. 19.40 +0100, skrev Vincent Untz:
(Note: let's suppose we have a developer tools suite)
Information about devhelp:
http://developer.imendio.com/projects/devhelp
Danilo's evaluation (i18n point of view):
= DevHelp =
No objections.
I agree. This should really go in
On Seg, 2007-01-08 at 18:05 -0500, Adam Schreiber wrote:
On 1/8/07, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can learn about seahorse here:
http://www.gnome.org/projects/seahorse/
+1 from me, but I'm biased as I'm a developer. However, I would like
to note that several of the concerns
confused questions
I read the FAQ and I dont know how seahorse relates to
gnome-keyring-manager?. One is keys and the other is keyrings. Are two
applications needed considering keys, encryption, keyrings and the
whole idea of it is confusing?
/confused question
On 1/9/07, BJörn Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it is replacing, it is replacing the whole Foot menu + Program menu
+ System menu because they are all part of one applet.
I really hope that the module will not be included in addition to the
previous menu. It is just pointless and
On 1/9/07, Travis Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If that's the case -1 for me. It might be great for new users but I
tried it for a week and had to force myself to keep using it after day
1.
It might be useful to explain more than that.
What way were you trying to use it? Why did it not fit
It might be useful to explain more than that.
What way were you trying to use it? Why did it not fit how you wanted to use
it?
etc?
I know the question was not meant for me, but I find it unusable without
a recently used apps menu, a places menu that follows nautilus'
bookmarks or deskbar
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Ghee Teo wrote:
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:31:07 +
From: Ghee Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: guenther [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: gnome-panel menu lockdown proposal
There is another type of gocha type of against lock down.
was that a
On 1/9/07, David Prieto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be useful to explain more than that.
What way were you trying to use it? Why did it not fit how you wanted to
use it?
etc?
I know the question was not meant for me, but I find it unusable without
a recently used apps menu,
Mine
it already does all that, except the places part
Might it be bacause of my distribution, then?
BTW are you saying that gnome-main-menu has deskbar integration? If I
open it and type gai, will it offer me to open Gaim, and then place it
under the recently used apps?
David Prieto wrote:
it already does all that, except the places part
Might it be bacause of my distribution, then?
BTW are you saying that gnome-main-menu has deskbar integration? If I
open it and type gai, will it offer me to open Gaim, and then place it
under the recently used apps?
it does not integrate deskbar and nor should it - the search should only
be for applications (IE .desktop files)
I could do with just application search, but as far as I know it doesn't
even do that.
As for beagle search, I never thought it was that all that useful. After
all the search tool
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 14:16 +0100, David Prieto wrote:
it already does all that, except the places part
Might it be bacause of my distribution, then?
BTW are you saying that gnome-main-menu has deskbar integration? If I
open it and type gai, will it offer me to open Gaim, and then place
David Prieto wrote:
it does not integrate deskbar and nor should it - the search should only
be for applications (IE .desktop files)
I could do with just application search, but as far as I know it doesn't
even do that.
As for beagle search, I never thought it was that all that useful.
it does that but using beagle, if available, AFAIK.
Well, that's not what I meant then.
Accessing an app through the more apps menu is painfully slow and
intrusive if you know what specific app you want to run, but it happens
not to be on your favourites menu.
The search bar could easily solve
Well IMO, the menu is far launching apps so it makes sense to limit
search there to apps
I'm not discussing this, in fact I agree - I'm just saying that
gnome-main-menu DOES NOT do it at the moment and it should.
Without that feature, it's less useful to me than the current menu and
therefore
was that a typo for 'gotcha'? as in got you, a hidden problem which
will might come back and get you?re
Yeap. You are absolutely correct!
Some dialog allows you to specify the command that you want to run (exec)
So user can simply change that to something like gnome-terminal and
+1 from me, too.
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
This is cool; it almost replaces gnome-keyring-manager... could it
replace it completely one day, I wonder?...
Could it end up replacing gnome-keyring-daemon as well (with
seahorse-agent) ?
___
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 14:28 +, Bill Haneman wrote:
As far as I know, gnome-main-menu hasn't had a thorough accessibility
review. As such, I'd be very wary of introducing it this late in the
release cycle.Shouldn't we have this discussion near the beginning
of the cycle (say,
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 13:59 +0100, David Prieto wrote:
Mine has this (recently used apps menu).
I'm sure you must mean a favourite apps menu, not recently used.
Otherwise please, correct me.
It has Favorite Apps, Recent Apps, and Recent Documents. For Recent Apps
to work, however, it
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 14:37 +0100, David Prieto wrote:
it does that but using beagle, if available, AFAIK.
Well, that's not what I meant then.
Accessing an app through the more apps menu is painfully slow and
intrusive if you know what specific app you want to run, but it happens
not to
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 09:27 +1300, John Stowers wrote:
+1
I find gnome-main-menu pleasant to use.
From a feature parity perspective I think KDE is shipping their fancy
new menu thing in KDE4 so it may be good to have something comparible
in GNOME. Yes feature copying is not always the
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 15:29 +0100, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
Calum Benson wrote:
On 4 Jan 2007, at 15:27, David Prieto wrote:
We could also add a context menu with open and
eject, since apps menu items already have context menus and it would
be just logical that items in the places menu
Richard Hughes wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 19:34 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Information about gnome-main-menu:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-October/msg00221.html
-1 from me, on no technical merit other than I don't like what it looks
like and I didn't like using
...
I'm rather surprised accessibility tests tell this one is better than
the current Gnome menu.
???
I am not aware of any accessibility tests on g-m-m at all. What I said
was that it should not go in until/unless accessibility testing shows
that it works as well or better with assistive
Le mardi 09 janvier 2007, à 17:44, Bill Haneman a écrit :
...
I'm rather surprised accessibility tests tell this one is better than
the current Gnome menu.
???
I am not aware of any accessibility tests on g-m-m at all. What I said
was that it should not go in until/unless
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 17:44 +, Bill Haneman wrote:
Since there was a lot of a11y work in the existing menu code, I doubt
that g-m-m would just work for all of our a11y scenarios without
bugfixes/tweaks.
Can you explain those scenarios? As I said in a previous reply, I spent
a lot of time
On 1/9/07, Steve Frécinaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 too.
It's of no use, and worse than other ways of achieving the same
functionnalities.
Its much quicker for different ways of working with menus. I no longer
have to hoke through menus to find what I want, and using a trackpad I
often
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 18:55 +, Iain * wrote:
On 1/9/07, Steve Frécinaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-1 too.
It's of no use, and worse than other ways of achieving the same
functionnalities.
Its much quicker for different ways of working with menus. I no longer
have to hoke through
Hi dobey;
Sorry, your previous message had gotten lost in the shuffle. I really
do appreciate the fact that you've kept accessibility in mind when
working on gnome-main-menu.
That said, I'd feel much happier about things if two things happened -
first, the orca and gok teams need to provide
Em Ter, 2007-01-09 às 18:55 +, Iain * escreveu:
But I use:
- xchat-irc, gajim, liferea and such daily
- epiphany, thunderbird, devhelp, gedit, terminal, matlab, pepito,
home folder every now.
So that makes obviously more than 6, and those are more easily and
Iain * wrote:
(Note that I don't have beagle, and that beagle is not
part of GNOME anyway)
Whats this got to do with anything? Seems a silly strawman arguement.
It was just a way to tell you I didn't test the possibilities linked to
the use of beagle. Not an argument, just a fact.
-
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 19:38 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
(Note: let's suppose we have a developer tools suite)
Information about anjuta:
http://anjuta.sourceforge.net/
I don't really think Anjuta is ready to be included in our new
(proposed) developer suite (yet!). The last release was in May
Rodney Dawes wrote:
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 15:48 -0500, Bryan Clark wrote:
Personally I think the menu is nice and there are a number of things I'd
have done differently but the main reason I see against including it is
that without beagle I can't imagine using it. I tried turning off beagle
37 matches
Mail list logo
