recommended D-Bus version for GNOME releases

2007-01-22 Thread John (J5) Palmieri
Hi guys, I was going over the GNOME release and noticed we are still using 0.93. Not only is this a non supported version upstream it contains a denial of service exploit CVE-2006-6107 - match rules can be removed by apps that did not create them. I suggest we move recommendations to 1.0.2 which

Re: recommended D-Bus version for GNOME releases

2007-01-22 Thread Elijah Newren
On 1/22/07, John (J5) Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys, I was going over the GNOME release and noticed we are still using 0.93. Not only is this a non supported version upstream it contains a denial of service exploit CVE-2006-6107 - match rules can be removed by apps that did not

Re: recommended D-Bus version for GNOME releases

2007-01-22 Thread Peter Gordon
Diego Escalante wrote: Would be a good chance to check if someone is still getting: Applications can not close shared connections. Please fix this in your app. Ignoring close request and continuing. I get this with Epiphany, though if I disable the extensions this does not occur. I'll

Re: recommended D-Bus version for GNOME releases

2007-01-22 Thread Adam Schreiber
On 1/22/07, Peter Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My guess at the moment is that it's probably the RSS feed integration extension, as that is the only one I can think of offhand that actively uses D-Bus stuff. The seahorse epiphany extension also uses dbus if you have it installed. Cheers,

how to identify if my laptop is docked without dmidecode

2007-01-22 Thread Ritesh Khadgaray
Heya, Is there a way to identify if a laptop is docked without using dmidecode, and with only hal or equivalent application which does not need root access ? Reason : To run a script at gnome login , which identifies if laptop is at home or office , and set few settings and run few

Re: Beagle CPU usage (was Proposed module: tracker)

2007-01-22 Thread Federico Mena Quintero
El mar, 16-01-2007 a las 11:05 +, Bastien Nocera escribió: On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 19:02 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: The right fix is to put this in libgnomeui/gnome-thumbnail.c, so that all thumbnailers get the same treatment. We just did this for gsf-office-thumbnailer because